| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The `clean_cmd` and `extra_clean` setup functions don't do anything.
Remove them from .T files.
Created using https://github.com/thomie/refactor-ghc-testsuite. This
diff is a test for the .T-file parser/processor/pretty-printer in that
repository.
find . -name '*.T' -exec ~/refactor-ghc-testsuite/Main "{}" \;
Tests containing inline comments or multiline strings are not modified.
Preparation for #12223.
Test Plan: Harbormaster
Reviewers: austin, hvr, simonmar, mpickering, bgamari
Reviewed By: mpickering
Subscribers: mpickering
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3000
GHC Trac Issues: #12223
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Amazingly, there were zero changes to the byte code generator and very
few changes to the interpreter - mainly because we've used good
abstractions that hide the differences between profiling and
non-profiling. So that bit was pleasantly straightforward, but there
were a pile of other wibbles to get the whole test suite through.
Note that a compiler built with -prof is now like one built with
-dynamic, in that to use TH you have to build the code the same way.
For dynamic, we automatically enable -dynamic-too when TH is required,
but we don't have anything equivalent for profiling, so you have to
explicitly use -prof when building code that uses TH with a profiled
compiler. For this reason Cabal won't work with TH. We don't expect
to ship a profiled compiler, so I think that's OK.
Test Plan: validate with GhcProfiled=YES in validate.mk
Reviewers: goldfire, bgamari, rwbarton, austin, hvr, erikd, ezyang
Reviewed By: ezyang
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1407
GHC Trac Issues: #4837, #545
|
