| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit implements the proposal in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/29 and
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/35.
Here are some of the pieces of that proposal:
* Some of RuntimeRep's constructors have been shortened.
* TupleRep and SumRep are now parameterized over a list of RuntimeReps.
* This
means that two types with the same kind surely have the same
representation.
Previously, all unboxed tuples had the same kind, and thus the fact
above was
false.
* RepType.typePrimRep and friends now return a *list* of PrimReps. These
functions can now work successfully on unboxed tuples. This change is
necessary because we allow abstraction over unboxed tuple types and so
cannot
always handle unboxed tuples specially as we did before.
* We sometimes have to create an Id from a PrimRep. I thus split PtrRep
* into
LiftedRep and UnliftedRep, so that the created Ids have the right
strictness.
* The RepType.RepType type was removed, as it didn't seem to help with
* much.
* The RepType.repType function is also removed, in favor of typePrimRep.
* I have waffled a good deal on whether or not to keep VoidRep in
TyCon.PrimRep. In the end, I decided to keep it there. PrimRep is *not*
represented in RuntimeRep, and typePrimRep will never return a list
including
VoidRep. But it's handy to have in, e.g., ByteCodeGen and friends. I can
imagine another design choice where we have a PrimRepV type that is
PrimRep
with an extra constructor. That seemed to be a heavier design, though,
and I'm
not sure what the benefit would be.
* The last, unused vestiges of # (unliftedTypeKind) have been removed.
* There were several pretty-printing bugs that this change exposed;
* these are fixed.
* We previously checked for levity polymorphism in the types of binders.
* But we
also must exclude levity polymorphism in function arguments. This is
hard to check
for, requiring a good deal of care in the desugarer. See Note [Levity
polymorphism
checking] in DsMonad.
* In order to efficiently check for levity polymorphism in functions, it
* was necessary
to add a new bit of IdInfo. See Note [Levity info] in IdInfo.
* It is now safe for unlifted types to be unsaturated in Core. Core Lint
* is updated
accordingly.
* We can only know strictness after zonking, so several checks around
* strictness
in the type-checker (checkStrictBinds, the check for unlifted variables
under a ~
pattern) have been moved to the desugarer.
* Along the way, I improved the treatment of unlifted vs. banged
* bindings. See
Note [Strict binds checks] in DsBinds and #13075.
* Now that we print type-checked source, we must be careful to print
* ConLikes correctly.
This is facilitated by a new HsConLikeOut constructor to HsExpr.
Particularly troublesome
are unlifted pattern synonyms that get an extra void# argument.
* Includes a submodule update for haddock, getting rid of #.
* New testcases:
typecheck/should_fail/StrictBinds
typecheck/should_fail/T12973
typecheck/should_run/StrictPats
typecheck/should_run/T12809
typecheck/should_fail/T13105
patsyn/should_fail/UnliftedPSBind
typecheck/should_fail/LevPolyBounded
typecheck/should_compile/T12987
typecheck/should_compile/T11736
* Fixed tickets:
#12809
#12973
#11736
#13075
#12987
* This also adds a test case for #13105. This test case is
* "compile_fail" and
succeeds, because I want the testsuite to monitor the error message.
When #13105 is fixed, the test case will compile cleanly.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the second attempt at merging D757.
This patch implements the idea floated in Trac #9858, namely that we
should generate type-representation information at the data type
declaration site, rather than when solving a Typeable constraint.
However, this turned out quite a bit harder than I expected. I still
think it's the right thing to do, and it's done now, but it was quite
a struggle.
See particularly
* Note [Grand plan for Typeable] in TcTypeable (which is a new module)
* Note [The overall promotion story] in DataCon (clarifies existing
stuff)
The most painful bit was that to generate Typeable instances (ie
TyConRepName bindings) for every TyCon is tricky for types in ghc-prim
etc:
* We need to have enough data types around to *define* a TyCon
* Many of these types are wired-in
Also, to minimise the code generated for each data type, I wanted to
generate pure data, not CAFs with unpackCString# stuff floating about.
Performance
~~~~~~~~~~~
Three perf/compiler tests start to allocate quite a bit more. This isn't
surprising, because they all allocate zillions of data types, with
practically no other code, esp. T1969
* T1969: GHC allocates 19% more
* T4801: GHC allocates 13% more
* T5321FD: GHC allocates 13% more
* T9675: GHC allocates 11% more
* T783: GHC allocates 11% more
* T5642: GHC allocates 10% more
I'm treating this as acceptable. The payoff comes in Typeable-heavy
code.
Remaining to do
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* I think that "TyCon" and "Module" are over-generic names to use for
the runtime type representations used in GHC.Typeable. Better might
be
"TrTyCon" and "TrModule". But I have not yet done this
* Add more info the the "TyCon" e.g. source location where it was
defined
* Use the new "Module" type to help with Trac Trac #10068
* It would be possible to generate TyConRepName (ie Typeable
instances) selectively rather than all the time. We'd need to persist
the information in interface files. Lacking a motivating reason I
have
not done this, but it would not be difficult.
Refactoring
~~~~~~~~~~~
As is so often the case, I ended up refactoring more than I intended.
In particular
* In TyCon, a type *family* (whether type or data) is repesented by a
FamilyTyCon
* a algebraic data type (including data/newtype instances) is
represented by AlgTyCon This wasn't true before; a data family
was represented as an AlgTyCon. There are some corresponding
changes in IfaceSyn.
* Also get rid of the (unhelpfully named) tyConParent.
* In TyCon define 'Promoted', isomorphic to Maybe, used when things are
optionally promoted; and use it elsewhere in GHC.
* Cleanup handling of knownKeyNames
* Each TyCon, including promoted TyCons, contains its TyConRepName, if
it has one. This is, in effect, the name of its Typeable instance.
Updates haddock submodule
Test Plan: Let Harbormaster validate
Reviewers: austin, hvr, goldfire
Subscribers: goldfire, thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1404
GHC Trac Issues: #9858
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit bef2f03e4d56d88a7e9752a7afd6a0a35616da6c.
This merge was botched
Also reverts haddock submodule.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements the idea floated in Trac #9858, namely that we
should generate type-representation information at the data type
declaration site, rather than when solving a Typeable constraint.
However, this turned out quite a bit harder than I expected. I still
think it's the right thing to do, and it's done now, but it was quite
a struggle.
See particularly
* Note [Grand plan for Typeable] in TcTypeable (which is a new module)
* Note [The overall promotion story] in DataCon (clarifies existing stuff)
The most painful bit was that to generate Typeable instances (ie
TyConRepName bindings) for every TyCon is tricky for types in ghc-prim
etc:
* We need to have enough data types around to *define* a TyCon
* Many of these types are wired-in
Also, to minimise the code generated for each data type, I wanted to
generate pure data, not CAFs with unpackCString# stuff floating about.
Performance
~~~~~~~~~~~
Three perf/compiler tests start to allocate quite a bit more. This isn't
surprising, because they all allocate zillions of data types, with
practically no other code, esp. T1969
* T3294: GHC allocates 110% more (filed #11030 to track this)
* T1969: GHC allocates 30% more
* T4801: GHC allocates 14% more
* T5321FD: GHC allocates 13% more
* T783: GHC allocates 12% more
* T9675: GHC allocates 12% more
* T5642: GHC allocates 10% more
* T9961: GHC allocates 6% more
* T9203: Program allocates 54% less
I'm treating this as acceptable. The payoff comes in Typeable-heavy
code.
Remaining to do
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* I think that "TyCon" and "Module" are over-generic names to use for
the runtime type representations used in GHC.Typeable. Better might be
"TrTyCon" and "TrModule". But I have not yet done this
* Add more info the the "TyCon" e.g. source location where it was
defined
* Use the new "Module" type to help with Trac Trac #10068
* It would be possible to generate TyConRepName (ie Typeable
instances) selectively rather than all the time. We'd need to persist
the information in interface files. Lacking a motivating reason I have
not done this, but it would not be difficult.
Refactoring
~~~~~~~~~~~
As is so often the case, I ended up refactoring more than I intended.
In particular
* In TyCon, a type *family* (whether type or data) is repesented by a
FamilyTyCon
* a algebraic data type (including data/newtype instances) is
represented by AlgTyCon This wasn't true before; a data family
was represented as an AlgTyCon. There are some corresponding
changes in IfaceSyn.
* Also get rid of the (unhelpfully named) tyConParent.
* In TyCon define 'Promoted', isomorphic to Maybe, used when things are
optionally promoted; and use it elsewhere in GHC.
* Cleanup handling of knownKeyNames
* Each TyCon, including promoted TyCons, contains its TyConRepName, if
it has one. This is, in effect, the name of its Typeable instance.
Requires update of the haddock submodule.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D757
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously we always printed qualified names, but that makes a lot of debug or
warning output very verbose. So now we only print qualified names with -dppr-debug.
Civilised output (from pukka error messages, with the environment available) is
unaffected
|
| |
|
