| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds a PromotionFlag field to HsOpTy, which is used
in pretty-printing and when determining whether to emit warnings
with -fwarn-unticked-promoted-constructors.
This allows us to correctly report tick-related warnings for things
like:
type A = Int : '[]
type B = [Int, Bool]
Updates haddock submodule
Fixes #19984
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Names appearing in Haddock docstrings are lexed and renamed like any other names
appearing in the AST. We currently rename names irrespective of the namespace,
so both type and constructor names corresponding to an identifier will appear in
the docstring. Haddock will select a given name as the link destination based on
its own heuristics.
This patch also restricts the limitation of `-haddock` being incompatible with
`Opt_KeepRawTokenStream`.
The export and documenation structure is now computed in GHC and serialised in
.hi files. This can be used by haddock to directly generate doc pages without
reparsing or renaming the source. At the moment the operation of haddock
is not modified, that's left to a future patch.
Updates the haddock submodule with the minimum changes needed.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Users can define their own (~) type operator
* Haddock can display documentation for the built-in (~)
* New transitional warnings implemented:
-Wtype-equality-out-of-scope
-Wtype-equality-requires-operators
Updates the haddock submodule.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update manual; explain ticks as optional disambiguation
rather than the preferred default.
This is a part of #20531.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note [Tidying multiple names at once] indicates that if multiple
variables have the same name then we shouldn't prioritise one of them
and instead rename them all to a1, a2, a3... etc
This patch implements that change, some error message changes as
expected.
Closes #20932
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes #17469, by improving matters when you use
non-existent field names in a record construction:
data T = MkT { x :: Int }
f v = MkT { y = 3 }
The check is now made in the renamer, in GHC.Rename.Env.lookupRecFieldOcc.
That in turn led to a spurious error in T9975a, which is fixed by
making GHC.Rename.Names.extendGlobalRdrEnvRn fail fast if it finds
duplicate bindings. See Note [Fail fast on duplicate definitions]
in that module for more details.
This patch was originated and worked on by Alex D (@nineonine)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When quoting (using a TH single or double quote) a built-in
name such as the list constructor (:), we didn't always check
that the resulting 'Name' was in the correct namespace.
This patch adds a check in GHC.Rename.Splice to ensure
we get a Name that is in the term-level/type-level namespace,
when using a single/double tick, respectively.
Fixes #20884.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit bddecda1a4c96da21e3f5211743ce5e4c78793a2.
This implements the first step in the plan formulated in #20025 to
improve the communication and migration strategy for the proposed
changes to Data.List.
Requires changing the haddock submodule to update the test output.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In accordance with GHC Proposal #281 "Visible forall in types of terms":
For three releases before this change takes place, include a new
warning -Wforall-identifier in -Wdefault. This warning will be triggered
at definition sites (but not use sites) of forall as an identifier.
Updates the haddock submodule.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
else the output may depend on the input order, which seems it may depend
on the concrete Uniques, which is causing headaches when including test
cases about that.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The inl_inline field of the InlinePragma record is modified to store pragma
source text by adding a data constructor of type SourceText. This can help in
tracking the actual text of pragma names.
Add/modify functions, modify type instance for InlineSpec type
Modify parser, lexer to handle InlineSpec constructors containing SourceText
Modify functions with InlineSpec type
Extract pragma source from InlineSpec for SpecSig, InlineSig types
Modify cvtInline function to add SourceText to InlineSpec type
Extract name for InlineSig, SpecSig from pragma, SpectInstSig from source (fixes #18138)
Extract pragma name for SpecPrag pragma, SpecSig signature
Add Haddock annotation for inlinePragmaName function
Add Haddock annotations for using helper functions in hsSigDoc
Remove redundant ppr in pragma name for SpecSig, InlineSig; update comment
Rename test to T18138 for misplaced SPECIALIZE pragma testcase
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit refactors the SuggestExtension type constructor of the
GhcHint to be more powerful and flexible. In particular, we can now
embed extra user information (essentially "sugar") to help clarifying
the suggestion. This makes the following possible:
Suggested fix: Perhaps you intended to use GADTs
or a similar language extension to enable syntax: data T where
We can still give to IDEs and tools a `LangExt.Extension` they can use,
but in the pretty-printed message we can tell the user a bit more on why
such extension is needed.
On top of that, we now have the ability to express conjuctions and
disjunctons, for those cases where GHC suggests to enable "X or Y" and
for the cases where we need "X and Y".
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit converts a bunch of HsToCore (Ds) messages to use the new
GHC's diagnostic message infrastructure. In particular the DsMessage
type has been expanded with a lot of type constructors, each
encapsulating a particular error and warning emitted during desugaring.
Due to the fact that levity polymorphism checking can happen both at the
Ds and at the TcRn level, a new `TcLevityCheckDsMessage` constructor has
been added to the `TcRnMessage` type.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Change the names of the fields in in `data FieldOcc`
- Renames `HsRecFld` to `HsRecSel`
- Replace `AmbiguousFieldOcc p` in `HsRecSel` with `FieldOcc p`
- Contains a haddock submodule update
The primary motivation of this change is to remove
`AmbiguousFieldOcc`. This is one of a suite of changes improving how
record syntax (most notably record update syntax) is represented in
the AST.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Don't show suggestions for similar variables when a data constructor
in a pattern is not in scope.
* Only suggest record fields when a record field for record creation or
updating is not in scope.
* Suggest similar record fields when a record field is not in scope with
-XOverloadedRecordDot.
* Show suggestions for data constructors if a type constructor or type
is not in scope, but only if -XDataKinds is enabled.
Fixes #19843.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Dynamic-by-default was a mechanism to automatically select the -dynamic
way for some targets.
It was implemented in a convoluted way: it was defined as a flavour
option, hence it couldn't be passed as a global settings (which are
produced by `configure` before considering flavours), so a build system
rule was used to pass -DDYNAMIC_BY_DEFAULT to the C compiler so that
deriveConstants could infer it.
* Make build system has it disabled for 8 years (951e28c0625ece7e0db6ac9d4a1e61e2737b10de)
* It has never been implemented in Hadrian
* Last time someone tried to enable it 1 year ago it didn't work (!2436)
* Having this as a global constant impedes making GHC multi-target (see !5427)
This commit fully removes support for dynamic-by-default. If someone
wants to reimplement something like this, it would probably need to move
the logic in the compiler.
(Doing this would probably need some refactoring of the way the compiler
handles DynFlags: DynFlags are used to store and to pass enabled ways to
many parts of the compiler. It can be set by command-line flags, GHC
API, global settings. In multi-target GHC, we will use DynFlags to load
the target platform and its constants: but at this point with the
current DynFlags implementation we can't easily update the existing
DynFlags with target-specific options such as dynamic-by-default without
overriding ways previously set by the user.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #19616.
This commit changes the `GHC.Driver.Errors.handleFlagWarnings` function
to rely on the newly introduced `DiagnosticReason`. This allows us to
correctly pretty-print the flags which triggered some warnings and in
turn remove the cruft around this function (like the extra filtering
and the `shouldPrintWarning` function.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Remove GHC.OldList
- Remove Data.OldList
- compat-unqualified-imports is no-op
- update haddock submodule
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #18966. Adds a new warning -Wambiguous-fields for uses of field selectors
or record updates that will be rejected in the future, when the DuplicateRecordFields
extension is simplified per https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/366.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #17853. We mustn't discard the result of pickGREs, because doing
so might lead to incorrect redundant import warnings.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit fixes 19 tests which were failing due to the use of
`consBag` / `snocBag`, which have been now replaced by `addMessage`.
This means that now GHC would output things in different order but
only for /diagnostics on the same line/, so this is just reflecting
that. The "normal" order of messages is still guaranteed.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch delays the detection of missing fields in record creation
after type-checking. This gives us better error messages (see updated
test outputs).
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit e63518f5d6a93be111f9108c0990a1162f88d615 tried to push all of the logic
of detecting out-of-scope type variables on the RHSes of associated type family
instances to `GHC.Tc.Validity` by deleting a similar check in the renamer.
Unfortunately, this commit went a little too far, as there are some corner
cases that `GHC.Tc.Validity` doesn't detect. Consider this example:
```hs
class C a where
data D a
instance forall a. C Int where
data instance D Int = MkD a
```
If this program isn't rejected by the time it reaches the typechecker, then
GHC will believe the `a` in `MkD a` is existentially quantified and accept it.
This is almost surely not what the user wants! The simplest way to reject
programs like this is to restore the old validity check in the renamer
(search for `improperly_scoped` in `rnFamEqn`).
Note that this is technically a breaking change, since the program in the
`polykinds/T9574` test case (which previously compiled) will now be rejected:
```hs
instance Funct ('KProxy :: KProxy o) where
type Codomain 'KProxy = NatTr (Proxy :: o -> *)
```
This is because the `o` on the RHS will now be rejected for being out of scope.
Luckily, this is simple to repair:
```hs
instance Funct ('KProxy :: KProxy o) where
type Codomain ('KProxy @o) = NatTr (Proxy :: o -> *)
```
All of the discussion is now a part of the revamped
`Note [Renaming associated types]` in `GHC.Rename.Module`.
A different design would be to make associated type family instances have
completely separate scoping from the parent instance declaration, much like
how associated type family default declarations work today. See the discussion
beginning at https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/18021#note_265729 for
more on this point. This, however, would break even more programs that are
accepted today and likely warrants a GHC proposal before going forward. In the
meantime, this patch fixes the issue described in #18021 in the least invasive
way possible. There are programs that are accepted today that will no longer
be accepted after this patch, but they are arguably pathological programs, and
they are simple to repair.
Fixes #18021.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes #18723 by:
* Moving the existing `GHC.Tc.Gen.HsType.bigConstraintTuple` validity
check to `GHC.Rename.Utils.checkCTupSize` for consistency with
`GHC.Rename.Utils.checkTupSize`, and
* Using `check(C)TupSize` when checking tuple _types_, in addition
to checking names, expressions, and patterns.
Note that I put as many of these checks as possible in the typechecker so
that GHC can properly distinguish between boxed and constraint tuples. The
exception to this rule is checking names, which I perform in the renamer
(in `GHC.Rename.Env`) so that we can rule out `(,, ... ,,)` and
`''(,, ... ,,)` alike in one fell swoop.
While I was in town, I also removed the `HsConstraintTuple` and
`HsBoxedTuple` constructors of `HsTupleSort`, which are functionally
unused. This requires a `haddock` submodule bump.
|
| |
|
|
| |
As well a ctuples and sums.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before this patch, referring to a data constructor in a term-level
context led to a scoping error:
ghci> id Int
<interactive>:1:4: error: Data constructor not in scope: Int
After this patch, the renamer falls back to the type namespace
and successfully finds the Int. It is then rejected in the type
checker with a more useful error message:
<interactive>:1:4: error:
• Illegal term-level use of the type constructor ‘Int’
imported from ‘Prelude’ (and originally defined in ‘GHC.Types’)
• In the first argument of ‘id’, namely ‘Int’
In the expression: id Int
We also do this for type variables.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
source syntax (#18565)
Previously, we desugared and coverage checked plain guard trees as
described in Lower Your Guards. That caused (in !3849) quite a bit of
pain when we need to partially recover tree structure of the input
syntax to return covered sets for long-distance information, for
example.
In this refactor, I introduced a guard tree variant for each relevant
source syntax component of a pattern-match (mainly match groups, match,
GRHS, empty case, pattern binding). I made sure to share as much
coverage checking code as possible, so that the syntax-specific checking
functions are just wrappers around the more substantial checking
functions for the LYG primitives (`checkSequence`, `checkGrds`).
The refactoring payed off in clearer code and elimination of all panics
related to assumed guard tree structure and thus fixes #18565.
I also took the liberty to rename and re-arrange the order of functions
and comments in the module, deleted some dead and irrelevant Notes,
wrote some new ones and gave an overview module haddock.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, `rnFamInstEqn` would mark the name of the type/data
family used in an equation as an occurrence, regardless of what sort
of family it is. Most of the time, this is the correct thing to do.
The exception is closed type families, whose equations constitute its
definition and therefore should not be marked as occurrences.
Overzealously counting the equations of a closed type family as
occurrences can cause certain warnings to not be emitted, as observed
in #18470. See `Note [Type family equations and occurrences]` in
`GHC.Rename.Module` for the full story.
This fixes #18470 with a little bit of extra-casing in
`rnFamInstEqn`. To accomplish this, I added an extra
`ClosedTyFamInfo` field to the `NonAssocTyFamEqn` constructor of
`AssocTyFamInfo` and refactored the relevant call sites accordingly
so that this information is propagated to `rnFamInstEqn`.
While I was in town, I moved `wrongTyFamName`, which checks that the
name of a closed type family matches the name in an equation for that
family, from the renamer to the typechecker to avoid the need for an
`ASSERT`. As an added bonus, this lets us simplify the details of
`ClosedTyFamInfo` a bit.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GHC is very wishy-washy about rejecting instance declarations with
nested `forall`s or contexts that are surrounded by outermost
parentheses. This can even lead to some strange interactions with
`ScopedTypeVariables`, as demonstrated in #18240. This patch makes
GHC more consistently reject instance types with nested
`forall`s/contexts so as to prevent these strange interactions.
On the implementation side, this patch tweaks `splitLHsInstDeclTy`
and `getLHsInstDeclHead` to not look through parentheses, which can
be semantically significant. I've added a
`Note [No nested foralls or contexts in instance types]` in
`GHC.Hs.Type` to explain why. This also introduces a
`no_nested_foralls_contexts_err` function in `GHC.Rename.HsType` to
catch nested `forall`s/contexts in instance types. This function is
now used in `rnClsInstDecl` (for ordinary instance declarations) and
`rnSrcDerivDecl` (for standalone `deriving` declarations), the latter
of which fixes #18271.
On the documentation side, this adds a new
"Formal syntax for instance declaration types" section to the GHC
User's Guide that presents a BNF-style grammar for what is and isn't
allowed in instance types.
Fixes #18240. Fixes #18271.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* support detection of slow ghc-bignum backend (to replace the detection
of integer-simple use). There are still some test cases that the
native backend doesn't handle efficiently enough.
* remove tests for GMP only functions that have been removed from
ghc-bignum
* fix test results showing dependent packages (e.g. integer-gmp) or
showing suggested instances
* fix test using Integer/Natural API or showing internal names
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both `bindLHsTyVarBndrs` and `bindHsQTyVars` take two separate
`Maybe` arguments, which I find terribly confusing. Thankfully, it's
possible to remove one `Maybe` argument from each of these functions,
which this patch accomplishes:
* `bindHsQTyVars` takes a `Maybe SDoc` argument, which is `Just` if
GHC should warn about any of the quantified type variables going
unused. However, every call site uses `Nothing` in practice. This
makes sense, since it doesn't really make sense to warn about
unused type variables bound by an `LHsQTyVars`. For instance, you
wouldn't warn about the `a` in `data Proxy a = Proxy` going unused.
As a result, I simply remove this `Maybe SDoc` argument altogether.
* `bindLHsTyVarBndrs` also takes a `Maybe SDoc` argument for the same
reasons that `bindHsQTyVars` took one. To make things more
confusing, however, `bindLHsTyVarBndrs` also takes a separate
`HsDocContext` argument, which is pretty-printed (to an `SDoc`) in
warnings and error messages.
In practice, the `Maybe SDoc` and the `HsDocContext` often contain
the same text. See the call sites for `bindLHsTyVarBndrs` in
`rnFamInstEqn` and `rnConDecl`, for instance. There are only a
handful of call sites where the text differs between the
`Maybe SDoc` and `HsDocContext` arguments:
* In `rnHsRuleDecl`, where the `Maybe SDoc` says "`In the rule`"
and the `HsDocContext` says "`In the transformation rule`".
* In `rnHsTyKi`/`rn_ty`, where the `Maybe SDoc` says
"`In the type`" but the `HsDocContext` is inhereted from the
surrounding context (e.g., if `rnHsTyKi` were called on a
top-level type signature, the `HsDocContext` would be
"`In the type signature`" instead)
In both cases, warnings/error messages arguably _improve_ by
unifying making the `Maybe SDoc`'s text match that of the
`HsDocContext`. As a result, I decided to remove the `Maybe SDoc`
argument to `bindLHsTyVarBndrs` entirely and simply reuse the text
from the `HsDocContext`. (I decided to change the phrase
"transformation rule" to "rewrite rule" while I was in the area.)
The `Maybe SDoc` argument has one other purpose: signaling when to
emit "`Unused quantified type variable`" warnings. To recover this
functionality, I replaced the `Maybe SDoc` argument with a
boolean-like `WarnUnusedForalls` argument. The only
`bindLHsTyVarBndrs` call site that chooses _not_ to emit these
warnings in `bindHsQTyVars`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch simplifies GHC to use simple subsumption.
Ticket #17775
Implements GHC proposal #287
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/
proposals/0287-simplify-subsumption.rst
All the motivation is described there; I will not repeat it here.
The implementation payload:
* tcSubType and friends become noticably simpler, because it no
longer uses eta-expansion when checking subsumption.
* No deeplyInstantiate or deeplySkolemise
That in turn means that some tests fail, by design; they can all
be fixed by eta expansion. There is a list of such changes below.
Implementing the patch led me into a variety of sticky corners, so
the patch includes several othe changes, some quite significant:
* I made String wired-in, so that
"foo" :: String rather than
"foo" :: [Char]
This improves error messages, and fixes #15679
* The pattern match checker relies on knowing about in-scope equality
constraints, andd adds them to the desugarer's environment using
addTyCsDs. But the co_fn in a FunBind was missed, and for some reason
simple-subsumption ends up with dictionaries there. So I added a
call to addTyCsDs. This is really part of #18049.
* I moved the ic_telescope field out of Implication and into
ForAllSkol instead. This is a nice win; just expresses the code
much better.
* There was a bug in GHC.Tc.TyCl.Instance.tcDataFamInstHeader.
We called checkDataKindSig inside tc_kind_sig, /before/
solveEqualities and zonking. Obviously wrong, easily fixed.
* solveLocalEqualitiesX: there was a whole mess in here, around
failing fast enough. I discovered a bad latent bug where we
could successfully kind-check a type signature, and use it,
but have unsolved constraints that could fill in coercion
holes in that signature -- aargh.
It's all explained in Note [Failure in local type signatures]
in GHC.Tc.Solver. Much better now.
* I fixed a serious bug in anonymous type holes. IN
f :: Int -> (forall a. a -> _) -> Int
that "_" should be a unification variable at the /outer/
level; it cannot be instantiated to 'a'. This was plain
wrong. New fields mode_lvl and mode_holes in TcTyMode,
and auxiliary data type GHC.Tc.Gen.HsType.HoleMode.
This fixes #16292, but makes no progress towards the more
ambitious #16082
* I got sucked into an enormous refactoring of the reporting of
equality errors in GHC.Tc.Errors, especially in
mkEqErr1
mkTyVarEqErr
misMatchMsg
misMatchMsgOrCND
In particular, the very tricky mkExpectedActualMsg function
is gone.
It took me a full day. But the result is far easier to understand.
(Still not easy!) This led to various minor improvements in error
output, and an enormous number of test-case error wibbles.
One particular point: for occurs-check errors I now just say
Can't match 'a' against '[a]'
rather than using the intimidating language of "occurs check".
* Pretty-printing AbsBinds
Tests review
* Eta expansions
T11305: one eta expansion
T12082: one eta expansion (undefined)
T13585a: one eta expansion
T3102: one eta expansion
T3692: two eta expansions (tricky)
T2239: two eta expansions
T16473: one eta
determ004: two eta expansions (undefined)
annfail06: two eta (undefined)
T17923: four eta expansions (a strange program indeed!)
tcrun035: one eta expansion
* Ambiguity check at higher rank. Now that we have simple
subsumption, a type like
f :: (forall a. Eq a => Int) -> Int
is no longer ambiguous, because we could write
g :: (forall a. Eq a => Int) -> Int
g = f
and it'd typecheck just fine. But f's type is a bit
suspicious, and we might want to consider making the
ambiguity check do a check on each sub-term. Meanwhile,
these tests are accepted, whereas they were previously
rejected as ambiguous:
T7220a
T15438
T10503
T9222
* Some more interesting error message wibbles
T13381: Fine: one error (Int ~ Exp Int)
rather than two (Int ~ Exp Int, Exp Int ~ Int)
T9834: Small change in error (improvement)
T10619: Improved
T2414: Small change, due to order of unification, fine
T2534: A very simple case in which a change of unification order
means we get tow unsolved constraints instead of one
tc211: bizarre impredicative tests; just accept this for now
Updates Cabal and haddock submodules.
Metric Increase:
T12150
T12234
T5837
haddock.base
Metric Decrease:
haddock.compiler
haddock.Cabal
haddock.base
Merge note: This appears to break the
`UnliftedNewtypesDifficultUnification` test. It has been marked as
broken in the interest of merging.
(cherry picked from commit 66b7b195cb3dce93ed5078b80bf568efae904cc5)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- `forAllOrNothing` now is monadic, so we can trace whether we bind
an explicit `forall` or not.
- #18145 arose because the free vars calculation was needlessly
complex. It is now greatly simplified.
- Replaced some other implicit var code with `filterFreeVarsToBind`.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.scott@gmail.com>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, `tcRules` would check for naughty quantification
candidates (see `Note [Naughty quantification candidates]` in
`TcMType`) when generalising over the type of a rewrite rule. This
caused sensible-looking rewrite rules (like those in #17710) to be
rejected. A more permissing (and easier-to-implement) approach is to
do what is described in `Note [Generalising in tcTyFamInstEqnGuts]`
in `TcTyClsDecls`: just re-quantify all the type variable binders,
regardless of the order in which the user specified them. After all,
the notion of type variable specificity has no real meaning in
rewrite rules, since one cannot "visibly apply" a rewrite rule.
I have written up this wisdom in
`Note [Re-quantify type variables in rules]` in `TcRules`.
As a result of this patch, compiling the `ExplicitForAllRules1` test
case now generates one fewer warning than it used to. As far as I can
tell, this is benign, since the thing that the disappearing warning
talked about was also mentioned in an entirely separate warning.
Fixes #17710.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Switching from `lookupGlobalOccRn_maybe` to `lookupInfoOccRn`
to check whether a `main` function is in scope. Unfortunately
`lookupGlobalOccRn_maybe` complains if there are multiple `main`
functions in scope.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This implements the warning proposed in option (B) of the
Data.List.singleton CLC [discussion][].
This warning, which is included in `-Wcompat` is intended to help users
identify imports of modules that will change incompatibly in future GHC
releases. This currently only includes `Data.List` due to the expected
specialisation and addition of `Data.List.singleton`.
Fixes #17244.
[discussion]: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/haskell-core-libraries/q3zHLmzBa5E/PmlAs_kYAQAJ
|
| | |
|
