summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T2494.stderr
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Unify result type earlier to improve error messagesSimon Peyton Jones2021-03-011-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ticket #19364 helpfully points out that we do not currently take advantage of pushing the result type of an application into the arguments. This makes error messages notably less good. The fix is rather easy: move the result-type unification step earlier. It's even a bit more efficient; in the the checking case we now do one less zonk. See Note [Unify with expected type before typechecking arguments] in GHC.Tc.Gen.App This change generally improves error messages, but it made one worse: typecheck/should_fail/T16204c. That led me to the realisation that a good error can be replaced by a less-good one, which provoked me to change GHC.Tc.Solver.Interact.inertsCanDischarge. It's explained in the new Note [Combining equalities] One other refactoring: I discovered that KindEqOrigin didn't need a Maybe in its type -- a nice simplification.
* Simple subsumptionwip/T17775Simon Peyton Jones2020-06-051-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch simplifies GHC to use simple subsumption. Ticket #17775 Implements GHC proposal #287 https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/ proposals/0287-simplify-subsumption.rst All the motivation is described there; I will not repeat it here. The implementation payload: * tcSubType and friends become noticably simpler, because it no longer uses eta-expansion when checking subsumption. * No deeplyInstantiate or deeplySkolemise That in turn means that some tests fail, by design; they can all be fixed by eta expansion. There is a list of such changes below. Implementing the patch led me into a variety of sticky corners, so the patch includes several othe changes, some quite significant: * I made String wired-in, so that "foo" :: String rather than "foo" :: [Char] This improves error messages, and fixes #15679 * The pattern match checker relies on knowing about in-scope equality constraints, andd adds them to the desugarer's environment using addTyCsDs. But the co_fn in a FunBind was missed, and for some reason simple-subsumption ends up with dictionaries there. So I added a call to addTyCsDs. This is really part of #18049. * I moved the ic_telescope field out of Implication and into ForAllSkol instead. This is a nice win; just expresses the code much better. * There was a bug in GHC.Tc.TyCl.Instance.tcDataFamInstHeader. We called checkDataKindSig inside tc_kind_sig, /before/ solveEqualities and zonking. Obviously wrong, easily fixed. * solveLocalEqualitiesX: there was a whole mess in here, around failing fast enough. I discovered a bad latent bug where we could successfully kind-check a type signature, and use it, but have unsolved constraints that could fill in coercion holes in that signature -- aargh. It's all explained in Note [Failure in local type signatures] in GHC.Tc.Solver. Much better now. * I fixed a serious bug in anonymous type holes. IN f :: Int -> (forall a. a -> _) -> Int that "_" should be a unification variable at the /outer/ level; it cannot be instantiated to 'a'. This was plain wrong. New fields mode_lvl and mode_holes in TcTyMode, and auxiliary data type GHC.Tc.Gen.HsType.HoleMode. This fixes #16292, but makes no progress towards the more ambitious #16082 * I got sucked into an enormous refactoring of the reporting of equality errors in GHC.Tc.Errors, especially in mkEqErr1 mkTyVarEqErr misMatchMsg misMatchMsgOrCND In particular, the very tricky mkExpectedActualMsg function is gone. It took me a full day. But the result is far easier to understand. (Still not easy!) This led to various minor improvements in error output, and an enormous number of test-case error wibbles. One particular point: for occurs-check errors I now just say Can't match 'a' against '[a]' rather than using the intimidating language of "occurs check". * Pretty-printing AbsBinds Tests review * Eta expansions T11305: one eta expansion T12082: one eta expansion (undefined) T13585a: one eta expansion T3102: one eta expansion T3692: two eta expansions (tricky) T2239: two eta expansions T16473: one eta determ004: two eta expansions (undefined) annfail06: two eta (undefined) T17923: four eta expansions (a strange program indeed!) tcrun035: one eta expansion * Ambiguity check at higher rank. Now that we have simple subsumption, a type like f :: (forall a. Eq a => Int) -> Int is no longer ambiguous, because we could write g :: (forall a. Eq a => Int) -> Int g = f and it'd typecheck just fine. But f's type is a bit suspicious, and we might want to consider making the ambiguity check do a check on each sub-term. Meanwhile, these tests are accepted, whereas they were previously rejected as ambiguous: T7220a T15438 T10503 T9222 * Some more interesting error message wibbles T13381: Fine: one error (Int ~ Exp Int) rather than two (Int ~ Exp Int, Exp Int ~ Int) T9834: Small change in error (improvement) T10619: Improved T2414: Small change, due to order of unification, fine T2534: A very simple case in which a change of unification order means we get tow unsolved constraints instead of one tc211: bizarre impredicative tests; just accept this for now Updates Cabal and haddock submodules. Metric Increase: T12150 T12234 T5837 haddock.base Metric Decrease: haddock.compiler haddock.Cabal haddock.base Merge note: This appears to break the `UnliftedNewtypesDifficultUnification` test. It has been marked as broken in the interest of merging. (cherry picked from commit 66b7b195cb3dce93ed5078b80bf568efae904cc5)
* Unwrap casts before checking vars in eager unifierRichard Eisenberg2018-07-101-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | Previously, checking whether (tv |> co) ~ (tv |> co) got deferred, because we looked for vars before stripping casts. (The left type would get stripped, and then tv ~ (tv |> co) would scare the occurs- checker.) This opportunity for improvement presented itself in other work. This is just an optimization. Some programs can now report more errors simultaneously.
* Track type variable scope more carefully.Richard Eisenberg2018-03-311-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The main job of this commit is to track more accurately the scope of tyvars introduced by user-written foralls. For example, it would be to have something like this: forall a. Int -> (forall k (b :: k). Proxy '[a, b]) -> Bool In that type, a's kind must be k, but k isn't in scope. We had a terrible way of doing this before (not worth repeating or describing here, but see the old tcImplicitTKBndrs and friends), but now we have a principled approach: make an Implication when kind-checking a forall. Doing so then hooks into the existing machinery for preventing skolem-escape, performing floating, etc. This also means that we bump the TcLevel whenever going into a forall. The new behavior is done in TcHsType.scopeTyVars, but see also TcHsType.tc{Im,Ex}plicitTKBndrs, which have undergone significant rewriting. There are several Notes near there to guide you. Of particular interest there is that Implication constraints can now have skolems that are out of order; this situation is reported in TcErrors. A major consequence of this is a slightly tweaked process for type- checking type declarations. The new Note [Use SigTvs in kind-checking pass] in TcTyClsDecls lays it out. The error message for dependent/should_fail/TypeSkolEscape has become noticeably worse. However, this is because the code in TcErrors goes to some length to preserve pre-8.0 error messages for kind errors. It's time to rip off that plaster and get rid of much of the kind-error-specific error messages. I tried this, and doing so led to a lovely error message for TypeSkolEscape. So: I'm accepting the error message quality regression for now, but will open up a new ticket to fix it, along with a larger error-message improvement I've been pondering. This applies also to dependent/should_fail/{BadTelescope2,T14066,T14066e}, polykinds/T11142. Other minor changes: - isUnliftedTypeKind didn't look for tuples and sums. It does now. - check_type used check_arg_type on both sides of an AppTy. But the left side of an AppTy isn't an arg, and this was causing a bad error message. I've changed it to use check_type on the left-hand side. - Some refactoring around when we print (TYPE blah) in error messages. The changes decrease the times when we do so, to good effect. Of course, this is still all controlled by -fprint-explicit-runtime-reps Fixes #14066 #14749 Test cases: dependent/should_compile/{T14066a,T14749}, dependent/should_fail/T14066{,c,d,e,f,g,h}
* Refactor ConDecl: Trac #14529Simon Peyton Jones2017-12-071-4/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch refactors HsDecls.ConDecl. Specifically * ConDeclGADT was horrible, with all the information hidden inside con_res_ty. Now it's kept separate, as it should be. * ConDeclH98: use [LHsTyVarBndr] instead of LHsQTyVars for the existentials. There is no implicit binding here. * Add a field con_forall to both ConDeclGADT and ConDeclH98 which says if there is an explicit user-written forall. * Field renamings in ConDecl con_cxt to con_mb_cxt con_details to con_args There is an accompanying submodule update to Haddock. Also the following change turned out to remove a lot of clutter: * add a smart constructor for HsAppsTy, namely mkHsAppsTy, and use it consistently. This avoids a lot of painful pattern matching for the common singleton case. Two api-annotation tests (T10278, and T10399) are broken, hence marking them as expect_broken(14529). Alan is going to fix them, probably by changing the con_forall field to con_forall :: Maybe SrcSpan instead of Bool
* Testsuite: remove Windows CR again.. [skip ci]Thomas Miedema2016-06-201-36/+36
|
* Improve typechecking of let-bindingsSimon Peyton Jones2016-06-131-36/+36
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This major commit was initially triggered by #11339, but it spiraled into a major review of the way in which type signatures for bindings are handled, especially partial type signatures. On the way I fixed a number of other bugs, namely #12069 #12033 #11700 #11339 #11670 The main change is that I completely reorganised the way in which type signatures in bindings are handled. The new story is in TcSigs Note [Overview of type signatures]. Some specific: * Changes in the data types for signatures in TcRnTypes: TcIdSigInfo and new TcIdSigInst * New module TcSigs deals with typechecking type signatures and pragmas. It contains code mostly moved from TcBinds, which is already too big * HsTypes: I swapped the nesting of HsWildCardBndrs and HsImplicitBndsrs, so that the wildcards are on the oustide not the insidde in a LHsSigWcType. This is just a matter of convenient, nothing deep. There are a host of other changes as knock-on effects, and it all took FAR longer than I anticipated :-). But it is a significant improvement, I think. Lots of error messages changed slightly, some just variants but some modest improvements. New tests * typecheck/should_compile * SigTyVars: a scoped-tyvar test * ExPat, ExPatFail: existential pattern bindings * T12069 * T11700 * T11339 * partial-sigs/should_compile * T12033 * T11339a * T11670 One thing to check: * Small change to output from ghc-api/landmines. Need to check with Alan Zimmerman
* Visible type applicationRichard Eisenberg2015-12-241-28/+30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This re-working of the typechecker algorithm is based on the paper "Visible type application", by Richard Eisenberg, Stephanie Weirich, and Hamidhasan Ahmed, to be published at ESOP'16. This patch introduces -XTypeApplications, which allows users to say, for example `id @Int`, which has type `Int -> Int`. See the changes to the user manual for details. This patch addresses tickets #10619, #5296, #10589.
* Rearrange error msgs and add section markers (Trac #11014).Evan Laforge2015-11-241-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This puts the "Relevant bindings" section at the end. It uses a TcErrors.Report Monoid to divide messages by importance and then mappends them together. This is not the most efficient way since there are various intermediate Reports and list appends, but it probably doesn't matter since error messages shouldn't get that large, and are usually prepended. In practice, everything is `important` except `relevantBindings`, which is `supplementary`. ErrMsg's errMsgShortDoc and errMsgExtraInfo were extracted into ErrDoc, which has important, context, and suppelementary fields. Each of those three sections is marked with a bullet character, '•' on unicode terminals and '*' on ascii terminals. Since this breaks tons of tests, I also modified testlib.normalise_errmsg to strip out '•'s. --- Additional notes: To avoid prepending * to an empty doc, I needed to filter empty docs. This seemed less error-prone than trying to modify everyone who produces SDoc to instead produce Maybe SDoc. So I added `Outputable.isEmpty`. Unfortunately it needs a DynFlags, which is kind of bogus, but otherwise I think I'd need another Empty case for SDoc, and then it couldn't be a newtype any more. ErrMsg's errMsgShortString is only used by the Show instance, which is in turn only used by Show HscTypes.SourceError, which is in turn only needed for the Exception instance. So it's probably possible to get rid of errMsgShortString, but that would a be an unrelated cleanup. Fixes #11014. Test Plan: see above Reviewers: austin, simonpj, thomie, bgamari Reviewed By: thomie, bgamari Subscribers: simonpj, nomeata, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1427 GHC Trac Issues: #11014
* Wibbles (usually improvements) to error messagesSimon Peyton Jones2014-11-211-34/+34
|
* Use U+2018 instead of U+201B quote mark in compiler messagesHerbert Valerio Riedel2014-02-251-10/+10
| | | | | | | This matches GCC's choice of Unicode quotation marks (i.e. U+2018 and U+2019) and therefore looks more familiar on the console. This addresses #2507. Signed-off-by: Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@gnu.org>
* Error message wibblesSimon Peyton Jones2013-12-281-34/+34
|
* Error message wibblesSimon Peyton Jones2013-09-101-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | Almost all are re-orderings of relevant-binding output Relevant bindings include + m :: Map (a, b) elt (bound at T3169.hs:12:17) + b :: b (bound at T3169.hs:12:13) lookup :: (a, b) -> Map (a, b) elt -> Maybe elt (bound at T3169.hs:12:3) - b :: b (bound at T3169.hs:12:13) - m :: Map (a, b) elt (bound at T3169.hs:12:17)
* Wibbles to error messages, following the fix for Trac #7851Simon Peyton Jones2013-04-291-2/+0
| | | | | | | | In effect, the error context for naked variables now takes up a "slot" in the context stack; but it is often empty. So the context stack becomes one shorter in those cases. I don't think this matters; indeed, it's aguably an improvement. Anyway that's why so many tests are affected.
* Update outputs following the unicode quote change in GHC's outputIan Lynagh2013-02-241-10/+10
|
* A ton of error message wibblesSimon Peyton Jones2012-09-211-6/+18
| | | | | | Notably * Showing relevant bindings * Not suggesting add instance (Num T); see Trac #7222
* Error message wibblesSimon Peyton Jones2012-04-231-3/+3
|
* Error message modifications following ghc-new-solver modificationsDimitrios.Vytiniotis2012-04-041-24/+24
|
* Error message wibbles following TyClDecl/HsTyDefn refactoringSimon Peyton Jones2012-03-261-24/+24
|
* Lots of error message wibbling, following theSimon Peyton Jones2012-01-121-22/+24
| | | | major TcErrors refactoring
* Error message modifications for the new constraint solver.Dimitrios Vytiniotis2011-11-161-22/+22
|
* Move tests from tests/ghc-regress/* to just tests/*David Terei2011-07-201-0/+22