summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T10715b.stderr
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Fix #19682 by breaking cycles in DerivedsRichard Eisenberg2021-06-051-5/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit expands the old Note [Type variable cycles in Givens] to apply as well to Deriveds. See the Note for details and examples. This fixes a regression introduced by my earlier commit that killed off the flattener in favor of the rewriter. A few other things happened along the way: * unifyTest was renamed to touchabilityTest, because that's what it does. * isInsolubleOccursCheck was folded into checkTypeEq, which does much of the same work. To get this to work out, though, we need to keep more careful track of what errors we spot in checkTypeEq, and so CheckTyEqResult has become rather more glorious. * A redundant Note or two was eliminated. * Kill off occCheckForErrors; due to Note [Rewriting synonyms], the extra occCheckExpand here is always redundant. * Store blocked equalities separately from other inerts; less stuff to look through when kicking out. Close #19682. test case: typecheck/should_compile/T19682{,b}
* Simple subsumptionwip/T17775Simon Peyton Jones2020-06-051-6/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch simplifies GHC to use simple subsumption. Ticket #17775 Implements GHC proposal #287 https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/ proposals/0287-simplify-subsumption.rst All the motivation is described there; I will not repeat it here. The implementation payload: * tcSubType and friends become noticably simpler, because it no longer uses eta-expansion when checking subsumption. * No deeplyInstantiate or deeplySkolemise That in turn means that some tests fail, by design; they can all be fixed by eta expansion. There is a list of such changes below. Implementing the patch led me into a variety of sticky corners, so the patch includes several othe changes, some quite significant: * I made String wired-in, so that "foo" :: String rather than "foo" :: [Char] This improves error messages, and fixes #15679 * The pattern match checker relies on knowing about in-scope equality constraints, andd adds them to the desugarer's environment using addTyCsDs. But the co_fn in a FunBind was missed, and for some reason simple-subsumption ends up with dictionaries there. So I added a call to addTyCsDs. This is really part of #18049. * I moved the ic_telescope field out of Implication and into ForAllSkol instead. This is a nice win; just expresses the code much better. * There was a bug in GHC.Tc.TyCl.Instance.tcDataFamInstHeader. We called checkDataKindSig inside tc_kind_sig, /before/ solveEqualities and zonking. Obviously wrong, easily fixed. * solveLocalEqualitiesX: there was a whole mess in here, around failing fast enough. I discovered a bad latent bug where we could successfully kind-check a type signature, and use it, but have unsolved constraints that could fill in coercion holes in that signature -- aargh. It's all explained in Note [Failure in local type signatures] in GHC.Tc.Solver. Much better now. * I fixed a serious bug in anonymous type holes. IN f :: Int -> (forall a. a -> _) -> Int that "_" should be a unification variable at the /outer/ level; it cannot be instantiated to 'a'. This was plain wrong. New fields mode_lvl and mode_holes in TcTyMode, and auxiliary data type GHC.Tc.Gen.HsType.HoleMode. This fixes #16292, but makes no progress towards the more ambitious #16082 * I got sucked into an enormous refactoring of the reporting of equality errors in GHC.Tc.Errors, especially in mkEqErr1 mkTyVarEqErr misMatchMsg misMatchMsgOrCND In particular, the very tricky mkExpectedActualMsg function is gone. It took me a full day. But the result is far easier to understand. (Still not easy!) This led to various minor improvements in error output, and an enormous number of test-case error wibbles. One particular point: for occurs-check errors I now just say Can't match 'a' against '[a]' rather than using the intimidating language of "occurs check". * Pretty-printing AbsBinds Tests review * Eta expansions T11305: one eta expansion T12082: one eta expansion (undefined) T13585a: one eta expansion T3102: one eta expansion T3692: two eta expansions (tricky) T2239: two eta expansions T16473: one eta determ004: two eta expansions (undefined) annfail06: two eta (undefined) T17923: four eta expansions (a strange program indeed!) tcrun035: one eta expansion * Ambiguity check at higher rank. Now that we have simple subsumption, a type like f :: (forall a. Eq a => Int) -> Int is no longer ambiguous, because we could write g :: (forall a. Eq a => Int) -> Int g = f and it'd typecheck just fine. But f's type is a bit suspicious, and we might want to consider making the ambiguity check do a check on each sub-term. Meanwhile, these tests are accepted, whereas they were previously rejected as ambiguous: T7220a T15438 T10503 T9222 * Some more interesting error message wibbles T13381: Fine: one error (Int ~ Exp Int) rather than two (Int ~ Exp Int, Exp Int ~ Int) T9834: Small change in error (improvement) T10619: Improved T2414: Small change, due to order of unification, fine T2534: A very simple case in which a change of unification order means we get tow unsolved constraints instead of one tc211: bizarre impredicative tests; just accept this for now Updates Cabal and haddock submodules. Metric Increase: T12150 T12234 T5837 haddock.base Metric Decrease: haddock.compiler haddock.Cabal haddock.base Merge note: This appears to break the `UnliftedNewtypesDifficultUnification` test. It has been marked as broken in the interest of merging. (cherry picked from commit 66b7b195cb3dce93ed5078b80bf568efae904cc5)
* Rearrange error msgs and add section markers (Trac #11014).Evan Laforge2015-11-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This puts the "Relevant bindings" section at the end. It uses a TcErrors.Report Monoid to divide messages by importance and then mappends them together. This is not the most efficient way since there are various intermediate Reports and list appends, but it probably doesn't matter since error messages shouldn't get that large, and are usually prepended. In practice, everything is `important` except `relevantBindings`, which is `supplementary`. ErrMsg's errMsgShortDoc and errMsgExtraInfo were extracted into ErrDoc, which has important, context, and suppelementary fields. Each of those three sections is marked with a bullet character, '•' on unicode terminals and '*' on ascii terminals. Since this breaks tons of tests, I also modified testlib.normalise_errmsg to strip out '•'s. --- Additional notes: To avoid prepending * to an empty doc, I needed to filter empty docs. This seemed less error-prone than trying to modify everyone who produces SDoc to instead produce Maybe SDoc. So I added `Outputable.isEmpty`. Unfortunately it needs a DynFlags, which is kind of bogus, but otherwise I think I'd need another Empty case for SDoc, and then it couldn't be a newtype any more. ErrMsg's errMsgShortString is only used by the Show instance, which is in turn only used by Show HscTypes.SourceError, which is in turn only needed for the Exception instance. So it's probably possible to get rid of errMsgShortString, but that would a be an unrelated cleanup. Fixes #11014. Test Plan: see above Reviewers: austin, simonpj, thomie, bgamari Reviewed By: thomie, bgamari Subscribers: simonpj, nomeata, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1427 GHC Trac Issues: #11014
* Slightly better `Coercible` errors.Richard Eisenberg2015-09-211-0/+8
This makes two real changes: - Equalities like (a ~R [a]) really *are* insoluble. Previously, GHC refused to give up when an occurs check bit on a representational equality. But for datatypes, it really should bail. - Now, GHC will sometimes report an occurs check error (in cases above) for representational equalities. Previously, it never did. This "fixes" #10715, where by "fix", I mean clarifies the error message. It's unclear how to do more to fix that ticket. Test cases: typecheck/should_fail/T10715{,b}