1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
|
{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-}
{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #-}
{-# LANGUAGE MultiWayIf #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
--
-- Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Klebinger
--
module GHC.CmmToAsm.BlockLayout
( sequenceTop, backendMaintainsCfg)
where
import GHC.Prelude hiding (head, init, last, tail)
import qualified GHC.Prelude as Partial (head, tail)
import GHC.Platform
import GHC.CmmToAsm.Instr
import GHC.CmmToAsm.Monad
import GHC.CmmToAsm.CFG
import GHC.CmmToAsm.Types
import GHC.CmmToAsm.Config
import GHC.Cmm
import GHC.Cmm.BlockId
import GHC.Cmm.Dataflow.Collections
import GHC.Cmm.Dataflow.Label
import GHC.Types.Unique.FM
import GHC.Data.Graph.Directed
import GHC.Data.Maybe
import GHC.Data.List.SetOps (removeDups)
import GHC.Data.OrdList
import GHC.Utils.Outputable
import GHC.Utils.Panic
import GHC.Utils.Panic.Plain
import GHC.Utils.Misc
import Data.List (sortOn, sortBy, nub)
import Data.List.NonEmpty (nonEmpty)
import qualified Data.List.NonEmpty as NE
import Data.Foldable (toList)
import qualified Data.Set as Set
import Data.STRef
import Control.Monad.ST.Strict
import Control.Monad (foldM, unless)
import GHC.Data.UnionFind
{-
Note [CFG based code layout]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The major steps in placing blocks are as follow:
* Compute a CFG based on the Cmm AST, see getCfgProc.
This CFG will have edge weights representing a guess
on how important they are.
* After we convert Cmm to Asm we run `optimizeCFG` which
adds a few more "educated guesses" to the equation.
* Then we run loop analysis on the CFG (`loopInfo`) which tells us
about loop headers, loop nesting levels and the sort.
* Based on the CFG and loop information refine the edge weights
in the CFG and normalize them relative to the most often visited
node. (See `mkGlobalWeights`)
* Feed this CFG into the block layout code (`sequenceTop`) in this
module. Which will then produce a code layout based on the input weights.
Note [Chain based CFG serialization]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For additional information also look at
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/wikis/commentary/compiler/code-layout
We have a CFG with edge weights based on which we try to place blocks next to
each other.
Edge weights not only represent likelihood of control transfer between blocks
but also how much a block would benefit from being placed sequentially after
it's predecessor.
For example blocks which are preceded by an info table are more likely to end
up in a different cache line than their predecessor and we can't eliminate the jump
so there is less benefit to placing them sequentially.
For example consider this example:
A: ...
jmp cond D (weak successor)
jmp B
B: ...
jmp C
C: ...
jmp X
D: ...
jmp B (weak successor)
We determine a block layout by building up chunks (calling them chains) of
possible control flows for which blocks will be placed sequentially.
Eg for our example we might end up with two chains like:
[A->B->C->X],[D]. Blocks inside chains will always be placed sequentially.
However there is no particular order in which chains are placed since
(hopefully) the blocks for which sequentiality is important have already
been placed in the same chain.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) First try to create a list of good chains.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good chains are these which allow us to eliminate jump instructions.
Which further eliminate often executed jumps first.
We do so by:
*) Ignore edges which represent instructions which can not be replaced
by fall through control flow. Primarily calls and edges to blocks which
are prefixed by a info table we have to jump across.
*) Then process remaining edges in order of frequency taken and:
+) If source and target have not been placed build a new chain from them.
+) If source and target have been placed, and are ends of differing chains
try to merge the two chains.
+) If one side of the edge is a end/front of a chain, add the other block of
to edge to the same chain
Eg if we look at edge (B -> C) and already have the chain (A -> B)
then we extend the chain to (A -> B -> C).
+) If the edge was used to modify or build a new chain remove the edge from
our working list.
*) If there any blocks not being placed into a chain after these steps we place
them into a chain consisting of only this block.
Ranking edges by their taken frequency, if
two edges compete for fall through on the same target block, the one taken
more often will automatically win out. Resulting in fewer instructions being
executed.
Creating singleton chains is required for situations where we have code of the
form:
A: goto B:
<infoTable>
B: goto C:
<infoTable>
C: ...
As the code in block B is only connected to the rest of the program via edges
which will be ignored in this step we make sure that B still ends up in a chain
this way.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) We also try to fuse chains.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a result from the above step we still end up with multiple chains which
represent sequential control flow chunks. But they are not yet suitable for
code layout as we need to place *all* blocks into a single sequence.
In this step we combine chains result from the above step via these steps:
*) Look at the ranked list of *all* edges, including calls/jumps across info tables
and the like.
*) Look at each edge and
+) Given an edge (A -> B) try to find two chains for which
* Block A is at the end of one chain
* Block B is at the front of the other chain.
+) If we find such a chain we "fuse" them into a single chain, remove the
edge from working set and continue.
+) If we can't find such chains we skip the edge and continue.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Place indirect successors (neighbours) after each other
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
We might have chains [A,B,C,X],[E] in a CFG of the sort:
A ---> B ---> C --------> X(exit)
\- ->E- -/
While E does not follow X it's still beneficial to place them near each other.
This can be advantageous if eg C,X,E will end up in the same cache line.
Note [Triangle Control Flow]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Checking if an argument is already evaluated leads to a somewhat
special case which looks like this:
A:
if (R1 & 7 != 0) goto Leval; else goto Lwork;
Leval: // global
call (I64[R1])(R1) returns to Lwork, args: 8, res: 8, upd: 8;
Lwork: // global
...
A
|\
| Leval
|/ - (This edge can be missing because of optimizations)
Lwork
Once we hit the metal the call instruction is just 2-3 bytes large
depending on the register used. So we lay out the assembly like this:
movq %rbx,%rax
andl $7,%eax
cmpq $1,%rax
jne Lwork
Leval:
jmp *(%rbx) # encoded in 2-3 bytes.
<info table>
Lwork:
...
We could explicitly check for this control flow pattern.
This is advantageous because:
* It's optimal if the argument isn't evaluated.
* If it's evaluated we only have the extra cost of jumping over
the 2-3 bytes for the call.
* Guarantees the smaller encoding for the conditional jump.
However given that Lwork usually has an info table we
penalize this edge. So Leval should get placed first
either way and things work out for the best.
Optimizing for the evaluated case instead would penalize
the other code path. It adds an jump as we can't fall through
to Lwork because of the info table.
Assuming that Lwork is large the chance that the "call" ends up
in the same cache line is also fairly small.
Note [Layout relevant edge weights]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The input to the chain based code layout algorithm is a CFG
with edges annotated with their frequency. The frequency
of traversal corresponds quite well to the cost of not placing
the connected blocks next to each other.
However even if having the same frequency certain edges are
inherently more or less relevant to code layout.
In particular:
* Edges which cross an info table are less relevant than others.
If we place the blocks across this edge next to each other
they are still separated by the info table which negates
much of the benefit. It makes it less likely both blocks
will share a cache line reducing the benefits from locality.
But it also prevents us from eliminating jump instructions.
* Conditional branches and switches are slightly less relevant.
We can completely remove unconditional jumps by placing them
next to each other. This is not true for conditional branch edges.
We apply a small modifier to them to ensure edges for which we can
eliminate the overhead completely are considered first. See also #18053.
* Edges constituted by a call are ignored.
Considering these hardly helped with performance and ignoring
them helps quite a bit to improve compiler performance.
So we perform a preprocessing step where we apply a multiplicator
to these kinds of edges.
-}
-- | Look at X number of blocks in two chains to determine
-- if they are "neighbours".
neighbourOverlapp :: Int
neighbourOverlapp = 2
-- | Maps blocks near the end of a chain to it's chain AND
-- the other blocks near the end.
-- [A,B,C,D,E] Gives entries like (B -> ([A,B], [A,B,C,D,E]))
-- where [A,B] are blocks in the end region of a chain.
-- This is cheaper then recomputing the ends multiple times.
type FrontierMap = LabelMap ([BlockId],BlockChain)
-- | A non empty ordered sequence of basic blocks.
-- It is suitable for serialization in this order.
--
-- We use OrdList instead of [] to allow fast append on both sides
-- when combining chains.
newtype BlockChain
= BlockChain { chainBlocks :: (OrdList BlockId) }
-- All chains are constructed the same way so comparison
-- including structure is faster.
instance Eq BlockChain where
BlockChain b1 == BlockChain b2 = strictlyEqOL b1 b2
-- Useful for things like sets and debugging purposes, sorts by blocks
-- in the chain.
instance Ord (BlockChain) where
(BlockChain lbls1) `compare` (BlockChain lbls2)
= assert (toList lbls1 /= toList lbls2 || lbls1 `strictlyEqOL` lbls2) $
strictlyOrdOL lbls1 lbls2
instance Outputable (BlockChain) where
ppr (BlockChain blks) =
parens (text "Chain:" <+> ppr (fromOL $ blks) )
chainFoldl :: (b -> BlockId -> b) -> b -> BlockChain -> b
chainFoldl f z (BlockChain blocks) = foldl' f z blocks
noDups :: [BlockChain] -> Bool
noDups chains =
let chainBlocks = concatMap chainToBlocks chains :: [BlockId]
(_blocks, dups) = removeDups compare chainBlocks
in if null dups then True
else pprTrace "Duplicates:" (ppr (map toList dups) $$ text "chains" <+> ppr chains ) False
inFront :: BlockId -> BlockChain -> Bool
inFront bid (BlockChain seq)
= headOL seq == bid
chainSingleton :: BlockId -> BlockChain
chainSingleton lbl
= BlockChain (unitOL lbl)
chainFromList :: [BlockId] -> BlockChain
chainFromList = BlockChain . toOL
chainSnoc :: BlockChain -> BlockId -> BlockChain
chainSnoc (BlockChain blks) lbl
= BlockChain (blks `snocOL` lbl)
chainCons :: BlockId -> BlockChain -> BlockChain
chainCons lbl (BlockChain blks)
= BlockChain (lbl `consOL` blks)
chainConcat :: BlockChain -> BlockChain -> BlockChain
chainConcat (BlockChain blks1) (BlockChain blks2)
= BlockChain (blks1 `appOL` blks2)
chainToBlocks :: BlockChain -> [BlockId]
chainToBlocks (BlockChain blks) = fromOL blks
-- | Given the Chain A -> B -> C -> D and we break at C
-- we get the two Chains (A -> B, C -> D) as result.
breakChainAt :: BlockId -> BlockChain
-> (BlockChain,BlockChain)
breakChainAt bid (BlockChain blks)
| not (bid == Partial.head rblks)
= panic "Block not in chain"
| otherwise
= (BlockChain (toOL lblks),
BlockChain (toOL rblks))
where
(lblks, rblks) = break (\lbl -> lbl == bid) (fromOL blks)
takeR :: Int -> BlockChain -> [BlockId]
takeR n (BlockChain blks) =
take n . fromOLReverse $ blks
takeL :: Int -> BlockChain -> [BlockId]
takeL n (BlockChain blks) =
take n . fromOL $ blks
-- Note [Combining neighborhood chains]
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- See also Note [Chain based CFG serialization]
-- We have the chains (A-B-C-D) and (E-F) and an Edge C->E.
--
-- While placing the latter after the former doesn't result in sequential
-- control flow it is still beneficial. As block C and E might end
-- up in the same cache line.
--
-- So we place these chains next to each other even if we can't fuse them.
--
-- A -> B -> C -> D
-- v
-- - -> E -> F ...
--
-- A simple heuristic to chose which chains we want to combine:
-- * Process edges in descending priority.
-- * Check if there is a edge near the end of one chain which goes
-- to a block near the start of another edge.
--
-- While we could take into account the space between the two blocks which
-- share an edge this blows up compile times quite a bit. It requires
-- us to find all edges between two chains, check the distance for all edges,
-- rank them based on the distance and only then we can select two chains
-- to combine. Which would add a lot of complexity for little gain.
--
-- So instead we just rank by the strength of the edge and use the first pair we
-- find.
-- | For a given list of chains and edges try to combine chains with strong
-- edges between them.
combineNeighbourhood :: [CfgEdge] -- ^ Edges to consider
-> [BlockChain] -- ^ Current chains of blocks
-> ([BlockChain], Set.Set (BlockId,BlockId))
-- ^ Resulting list of block chains, and a set of edges which
-- were used to fuse chains and as such no longer need to be
-- considered.
combineNeighbourhood edges chains
= -- pprTraceIt "Neighbours" $
-- pprTrace "combineNeighbours" (ppr edges) $
applyEdges edges endFrontier startFrontier (Set.empty)
where
--Build maps from chain ends to chains
endFrontier, startFrontier :: FrontierMap
endFrontier =
mapFromList $ concatMap (\chain ->
let ends = getEnds chain :: [BlockId]
entry = (ends,chain)
in map (\x -> (x,entry)) ends ) chains
startFrontier =
mapFromList $ concatMap (\chain ->
let front = getFronts chain
entry = (front,chain)
in map (\x -> (x,entry)) front) chains
applyEdges :: [CfgEdge] -> FrontierMap -> FrontierMap -> Set.Set (BlockId, BlockId)
-> ([BlockChain], Set.Set (BlockId,BlockId))
applyEdges [] chainEnds _chainFronts combined =
(ordNub $ map snd $ mapElems chainEnds, combined)
applyEdges ((CfgEdge from to _w):edges) chainEnds chainFronts combined
| Just (c1_e,c1) <- mapLookup from chainEnds
, Just (c2_f,c2) <- mapLookup to chainFronts
, c1 /= c2 -- Avoid trying to concat a chain with itself.
= let newChain = chainConcat c1 c2
newChainFrontier = getFronts newChain
newChainEnds = getEnds newChain
newFronts :: FrontierMap
newFronts =
let withoutOld =
foldl' (\m b -> mapDelete b m :: FrontierMap) chainFronts (c2_f ++ getFronts c1)
entry =
(newChainFrontier,newChain) --let bound to ensure sharing
in foldl' (\m x -> mapInsert x entry m)
withoutOld newChainFrontier
newEnds =
let withoutOld = foldl' (\m b -> mapDelete b m) chainEnds (c1_e ++ getEnds c2)
entry = (newChainEnds,newChain) --let bound to ensure sharing
in foldl' (\m x -> mapInsert x entry m)
withoutOld newChainEnds
in
-- pprTrace "ApplyEdges"
-- (text "before" $$
-- text "fronts" <+> ppr chainFronts $$
-- text "ends" <+> ppr chainEnds $$
-- text "various" $$
-- text "newChain" <+> ppr newChain $$
-- text "newChainFrontier" <+> ppr newChainFrontier $$
-- text "newChainEnds" <+> ppr newChainEnds $$
-- text "drop" <+> ppr ((c2_f ++ getFronts c1) ++ (c1_e ++ getEnds c2)) $$
-- text "after" $$
-- text "fronts" <+> ppr newFronts $$
-- text "ends" <+> ppr newEnds
-- )
applyEdges edges newEnds newFronts (Set.insert (from,to) combined)
| otherwise
= applyEdges edges chainEnds chainFronts combined
getFronts chain = takeL neighbourOverlapp chain
getEnds chain = takeR neighbourOverlapp chain
-- In the last stop we combine all chains into a single one.
-- Trying to place chains with strong edges next to each other.
mergeChains :: [CfgEdge] -> [BlockChain]
-> (BlockChain)
mergeChains edges chains
= runST $ do
let addChain m0 chain = do
ref <- fresh chain
return $ chainFoldl (\m' b -> mapInsert b ref m') m0 chain
chainMap' <- foldM (\m0 c -> addChain m0 c) mapEmpty chains
merge edges chainMap'
where
-- We keep a map from ALL blocks to their respective chain (sigh)
-- This is required since when looking at an edge we need to find
-- the associated chains quickly.
-- We use a union-find data structure to do this efficiently.
merge :: forall s. [CfgEdge] -> LabelMap (Point s BlockChain) -> ST s BlockChain
merge [] chains = do
chains' <- mapM find =<< (nub <$> (mapM repr $ mapElems chains)) :: ST s [BlockChain]
return $ foldl' chainConcat (Partial.head chains') (Partial.tail chains')
merge ((CfgEdge from to _):edges) chains
-- | pprTrace "merge" (ppr (from,to) <> ppr chains) False
-- = undefined
= do
same <- equivalent cFrom cTo
unless same $ do
cRight <- find cTo
cLeft <- find cFrom
new_point <- fresh (chainConcat cLeft cRight)
union cTo new_point
union cFrom new_point
merge edges chains
where
cFrom = expectJust "mergeChains:chainMap:from" $ mapLookup from chains
cTo = expectJust "mergeChains:chainMap:to" $ mapLookup to chains
-- See Note [Chain based CFG serialization] for the general idea.
-- This creates and fuses chains at the same time for performance reasons.
-- Try to build chains from a list of edges.
-- Edges must be sorted **descending** by their priority.
-- Returns the constructed chains, along with all edges which
-- are irrelevant past this point, this information doesn't need
-- to be complete - it's only used to speed up the process.
-- An Edge is irrelevant if the ends are part of the same chain.
-- We say these edges are already linked
buildChains :: [CfgEdge] -> [BlockId]
-> ( LabelMap BlockChain -- Resulting chains, indexed by end if chain.
, Set.Set (BlockId, BlockId)) --List of fused edges.
buildChains edges blocks
= runST $ buildNext setEmpty mapEmpty mapEmpty edges Set.empty
where
-- buildNext builds up chains from edges one at a time.
-- We keep a map from the ends of chains to the chains.
-- This way we can easily check if an block should be appended to an
-- existing chain!
-- We store them using STRefs so we don't have to rebuild the spine of both
-- maps every time we update a chain.
buildNext :: forall s. LabelSet
-> LabelMap (STRef s BlockChain) -- Map from end of chain to chain.
-> LabelMap (STRef s BlockChain) -- Map from start of chain to chain.
-> [CfgEdge] -- Edges to check - ordered by decreasing weight
-> Set.Set (BlockId, BlockId) -- Used edges
-> ST s ( LabelMap BlockChain -- Chains by end
, Set.Set (BlockId, BlockId) --List of fused edges
)
buildNext placed _chainStarts chainEnds [] linked = do
ends' <- sequence $ mapMap readSTRef chainEnds :: ST s (LabelMap BlockChain)
-- Any remaining blocks have to be made to singleton chains.
-- They might be combined with other chains later on outside this function.
let unplaced = filter (\x -> not (setMember x placed)) blocks
singletons = map (\x -> (x,chainSingleton x)) unplaced :: [(BlockId,BlockChain)]
return (foldl' (\m (k,v) -> mapInsert k v m) ends' singletons , linked)
buildNext placed chainStarts chainEnds (edge:todo) linked
| from == to
-- We skip self edges
= buildNext placed chainStarts chainEnds todo (Set.insert (from,to) linked)
| not (alreadyPlaced from) &&
not (alreadyPlaced to)
= do
--pprTraceM "Edge-Chain:" (ppr edge)
chain' <- newSTRef $ chainFromList [from,to]
buildNext
(setInsert to (setInsert from placed))
(mapInsert from chain' chainStarts)
(mapInsert to chain' chainEnds)
todo
(Set.insert (from,to) linked)
| (alreadyPlaced from) &&
(alreadyPlaced to)
, Just predChain <- mapLookup from chainEnds
, Just succChain <- mapLookup to chainStarts
, predChain /= succChain -- Otherwise we try to create a cycle.
= fuseChain predChain succChain
| (alreadyPlaced from) &&
(alreadyPlaced to)
= buildNext placed chainStarts chainEnds todo linked
| otherwise
= findChain
where
from = edgeFrom edge
to = edgeTo edge
alreadyPlaced blkId = (setMember blkId placed)
-- Combine two chains into a single one.
fuseChain :: STRef s BlockChain -> STRef s BlockChain
-> ST s ( LabelMap BlockChain -- Chains by end
, Set.Set (BlockId, BlockId) --List of fused edges
)
fuseChain fromRef toRef = do
fromChain <- readSTRef fromRef
toChain <- readSTRef toRef
let newChain = chainConcat fromChain toChain
ref <- newSTRef newChain
let start = Partial.head $ takeL 1 newChain
let end = Partial.head $ takeR 1 newChain
-- chains <- sequence $ mapMap readSTRef chainStarts
-- pprTraceM "pre-fuse chains:" $ ppr chains
buildNext
placed
(mapInsert start ref $ mapDelete to $ chainStarts)
(mapInsert end ref $ mapDelete from $ chainEnds)
todo
(Set.insert (from,to) linked)
--Add the block to a existing chain or creates a new chain
findChain :: ST s ( LabelMap BlockChain -- Chains by end
, Set.Set (BlockId, BlockId) --List of fused edges
)
findChain
-- We can attach the block to the end of a chain
| alreadyPlaced from
, Just predChain <- mapLookup from chainEnds
= do
chain <- readSTRef predChain
let newChain = chainSnoc chain to
writeSTRef predChain newChain
let chainEnds' = mapInsert to predChain $ mapDelete from chainEnds
-- chains <- sequence $ mapMap readSTRef chainStarts
-- pprTraceM "from chains:" $ ppr chains
buildNext (setInsert to placed) chainStarts chainEnds' todo (Set.insert (from,to) linked)
-- We can attack it to the front of a chain
| alreadyPlaced to
, Just succChain <- mapLookup to chainStarts
= do
chain <- readSTRef succChain
let newChain = from `chainCons` chain
writeSTRef succChain newChain
let chainStarts' = mapInsert from succChain $ mapDelete to chainStarts
-- chains <- sequence $ mapMap readSTRef chainStarts'
-- pprTraceM "to chains:" $ ppr chains
buildNext (setInsert from placed) chainStarts' chainEnds todo (Set.insert (from,to) linked)
-- The placed end of the edge is part of a chain already and not an end.
| otherwise
= do
let block = if alreadyPlaced to then from else to
--pprTraceM "Singleton" $ ppr block
let newChain = chainSingleton block
ref <- newSTRef newChain
buildNext (setInsert block placed) (mapInsert block ref chainStarts)
(mapInsert block ref chainEnds) todo (linked)
where
alreadyPlaced blkId = (setMember blkId placed)
-- | Place basic blocks based on the given CFG.
-- See Note [Chain based CFG serialization]
sequenceChain :: forall a i. Instruction i
=> LabelMap a -- ^ Keys indicate an info table on the block.
-> CFG -- ^ Control flow graph and some meta data.
-> [GenBasicBlock i] -- ^ List of basic blocks to be placed.
-> [GenBasicBlock i] -- ^ Blocks placed in sequence.
sequenceChain _info _weights [] = []
sequenceChain _info _weights [x] = [x]
sequenceChain info weights blocks@((BasicBlock entry _):_) =
let directEdges :: [CfgEdge]
directEdges = sortBy (flip compare) $ mapMaybe relevantWeight (infoEdgeList weights)
where
-- Apply modifiers to turn edge frequencies into useable weights
-- for computing code layout.
-- See also Note [Layout relevant edge weights]
relevantWeight :: CfgEdge -> Maybe CfgEdge
relevantWeight edge@(CfgEdge from to edgeInfo)
| (EdgeInfo CmmSource { trans_cmmNode = CmmCall {} } _) <- edgeInfo
-- Ignore edges across calls.
= Nothing
| mapMember to info
, w <- edgeWeight edgeInfo
-- The payoff is quite small if we jump over an info table
= Just (CfgEdge from to edgeInfo { edgeWeight = w/8 })
| (EdgeInfo CmmSource { trans_cmmNode = exitNode } _) <- edgeInfo
, cantEliminate exitNode
, w <- edgeWeight edgeInfo
-- A small penalty to edge types which
-- we can't optimize away by layout.
-- w * 0.96875 == w - w/32
= Just (CfgEdge from to edgeInfo { edgeWeight = w * 0.96875 })
| otherwise
= Just edge
where
cantEliminate CmmCondBranch {} = True
cantEliminate CmmSwitch {} = True
cantEliminate _ = False
blockMap :: LabelMap (GenBasicBlock i)
blockMap
= foldl' (\m blk@(BasicBlock lbl _ins) ->
mapInsert lbl blk m)
mapEmpty blocks
(builtChains, builtEdges)
= {-# SCC "buildChains" #-}
--pprTraceIt "generatedChains" $
--pprTrace "blocks" (ppr (mapKeys blockMap)) $
buildChains directEdges (mapKeys blockMap)
rankedEdges :: [CfgEdge]
-- Sort descending by weight, remove fused edges
rankedEdges =
filter (\edge -> not (Set.member (edgeFrom edge,edgeTo edge) builtEdges)) $
directEdges
(neighbourChains, combined)
= assert (noDups $ mapElems builtChains) $
{-# SCC "groupNeighbourChains" #-}
-- pprTraceIt "NeighbourChains" $
combineNeighbourhood rankedEdges (mapElems builtChains)
allEdges :: [CfgEdge]
allEdges = {-# SCC allEdges #-}
sortOn (relevantWeight) $ filter (not . deadEdge) $ (infoEdgeList weights)
where
deadEdge :: CfgEdge -> Bool
deadEdge (CfgEdge from to _) = let e = (from,to) in Set.member e combined || Set.member e builtEdges
relevantWeight :: CfgEdge -> EdgeWeight
relevantWeight (CfgEdge _ _ edgeInfo)
| EdgeInfo (CmmSource { trans_cmmNode = CmmCall {}}) _ <- edgeInfo
-- Penalize edges across calls
= weight/(64.0)
| otherwise
= weight
where
-- negate to sort descending
weight = negate (edgeWeight edgeInfo)
masterChain =
{-# SCC "mergeChains" #-}
-- pprTraceIt "MergedChains" $
mergeChains allEdges neighbourChains
--Make sure the first block stays first
prepedChains
| inFront entry masterChain
= [masterChain]
| (rest,entry) <- breakChainAt entry masterChain
= [entry,rest]
#if __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ <= 810
| otherwise = pprPanic "Entry point eliminated" $
ppr masterChain
#endif
blockList
= assert (noDups [masterChain])
(concatMap fromOL $ map chainBlocks prepedChains)
--chainPlaced = setFromList $ map blockId blockList :: LabelSet
chainPlaced = setFromList $ blockList :: LabelSet
unplaced =
let blocks = mapKeys blockMap
isPlaced b = setMember (b) chainPlaced
in filter (\block -> not (isPlaced block)) blocks
placedBlocks =
-- We want debug builds to catch this as it's a good indicator for
-- issues with CFG invariants. But we don't want to blow up production
-- builds if something slips through.
assert (null unplaced) $
--pprTraceIt "placedBlocks" $
-- ++ [] is still kinda expensive
if null unplaced then blockList else blockList ++ unplaced
getBlock bid = expectJust "Block placement" $ mapLookup bid blockMap
in
--Assert we placed all blocks given as input
assert (all (\bid -> mapMember bid blockMap) placedBlocks) $
dropJumps info $ map getBlock placedBlocks
{-# SCC dropJumps #-}
-- | Remove redundant jumps between blocks when we can rely on
-- fall through.
dropJumps :: forall a i. Instruction i => LabelMap a -> [GenBasicBlock i]
-> [GenBasicBlock i]
dropJumps _ [] = []
dropJumps info (BasicBlock lbl ins:todo)
| Just ins <- nonEmpty ins --This can happen because of shortcutting
, [dest] <- jumpDestsOfInstr (NE.last ins)
, BasicBlock nextLbl _ : _ <- todo
, not (mapMember dest info)
, nextLbl == dest
= BasicBlock lbl (NE.init ins) : dropJumps info todo
| otherwise
= BasicBlock lbl ins : dropJumps info todo
-- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Sequencing the basic blocks
-- Cmm BasicBlocks are self-contained entities: they always end in a
-- jump, either non-local or to another basic block in the same proc.
-- In this phase, we attempt to place the basic blocks in a sequence
-- such that as many of the local jumps as possible turn into
-- fallthroughs.
sequenceTop
:: Instruction instr
=> NcgImpl statics instr jumpDest
-> Maybe CFG -- ^ CFG if we have one.
-> NatCmmDecl statics instr -- ^ Function to serialize
-> NatCmmDecl statics instr
sequenceTop _ _ top@(CmmData _ _) = top
sequenceTop ncgImpl edgeWeights (CmmProc info lbl live (ListGraph blocks))
= let
config = ncgConfig ncgImpl
platform = ncgPlatform config
in CmmProc info lbl live $ ListGraph $ ncgMakeFarBranches ncgImpl info $
if -- Chain based algorithm
| ncgCfgBlockLayout config
, backendMaintainsCfg platform
, Just cfg <- edgeWeights
-> {-# SCC layoutBlocks #-} sequenceChain info cfg blocks
-- Old algorithm without edge weights
| ncgCfgWeightlessLayout config
|| not (backendMaintainsCfg platform)
-> {-# SCC layoutBlocks #-} sequenceBlocks Nothing info blocks
-- Old algorithm with edge weights (if any)
| otherwise
-> {-# SCC layoutBlocks #-} sequenceBlocks edgeWeights info blocks
-- The old algorithm:
-- It is very simple (and stupid): We make a graph out of
-- the blocks where there is an edge from one block to another iff the
-- first block ends by jumping to the second. Then we topologically
-- sort this graph. Then traverse the list: for each block, we first
-- output the block, then if it has an out edge, we move the
-- destination of the out edge to the front of the list, and continue.
-- FYI, the classic layout for basic blocks uses postorder DFS; this
-- algorithm is implemented in Hoopl.
sequenceBlocks :: Instruction inst => Maybe CFG -> LabelMap a
-> [GenBasicBlock inst] -> [GenBasicBlock inst]
sequenceBlocks _edgeWeight _ [] = []
sequenceBlocks edgeWeights infos (entry:blocks) =
let entryNode = mkNode edgeWeights entry
bodyNodes = reverse
(flattenSCCs (sccBlocks edgeWeights blocks))
in dropJumps infos . seqBlocks infos $ ( entryNode : bodyNodes)
-- the first block is the entry point ==> it must remain at the start.
sccBlocks
:: Instruction instr
=> Maybe CFG -> [NatBasicBlock instr]
-> [SCC (Node BlockId (NatBasicBlock instr))]
sccBlocks edgeWeights blocks =
stronglyConnCompFromEdgedVerticesUniqR
(map (mkNode edgeWeights) blocks)
mkNode :: (Instruction t)
=> Maybe CFG -> GenBasicBlock t
-> Node BlockId (GenBasicBlock t)
mkNode edgeWeights block@(BasicBlock id instrs) =
DigraphNode block id outEdges
where
outEdges :: [BlockId]
outEdges
--Select the heaviest successor, ignore weights <= zero
= successor
where
successor
| Just successors <- fmap (`getSuccEdgesSorted` id)
edgeWeights -- :: Maybe [(Label, EdgeInfo)]
= case successors of
[] -> []
((target,info):_)
| length successors > 2 || edgeWeight info <= 0 -> []
| otherwise -> [target]
| Just instr <- lastMaybe instrs
, [one] <- jumpDestsOfInstr instr
= [one]
| otherwise = []
seqBlocks :: LabelMap i -> [Node BlockId (GenBasicBlock t1)]
-> [GenBasicBlock t1]
seqBlocks infos blocks = placeNext pullable0 todo0
where
-- pullable: Blocks that are not yet placed
-- todo: Original order of blocks, to be followed if we have no good
-- reason not to;
-- may include blocks that have already been placed, but then
-- these are not in pullable
pullable0 = listToUFM [ (i,(b,n)) | DigraphNode b i n <- blocks ]
todo0 = map node_key blocks
placeNext _ [] = []
placeNext pullable (i:rest)
| Just (block, pullable') <- lookupDeleteUFM pullable i
= place pullable' rest block
| otherwise
-- We already placed this block, so ignore
= placeNext pullable rest
place pullable todo (block,[])
= block : placeNext pullable todo
place pullable todo (block@(BasicBlock id instrs),[next])
| mapMember next infos
= block : placeNext pullable todo
| Just (nextBlock, pullable') <- lookupDeleteUFM pullable next
= BasicBlock id instrs : place pullable' todo nextBlock
| otherwise
= block : placeNext pullable todo
place _ _ (_,tooManyNextNodes)
= pprPanic "seqBlocks" (ppr tooManyNextNodes)
lookupDeleteUFM :: UniqFM BlockId elt -> BlockId
-> Maybe (elt, UniqFM BlockId elt)
lookupDeleteUFM m k = do -- Maybe monad
v <- lookupUFM m k
return (v, delFromUFM m k)
backendMaintainsCfg :: Platform -> Bool
backendMaintainsCfg platform = case platformArch platform of
-- ArchX86 -- Should work but not tested so disabled currently.
ArchX86_64 -> True
_otherwise -> False
|