1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
|
{-
Describes predicates as they are considered by the solver.
-}
module GHC.Core.Predicate (
Pred(..), classifyPredType,
isPredTy, isEvVarType,
-- Equality predicates
EqRel(..), eqRelRole,
isEqPrimPred, isEqPred,
getEqPredTys, getEqPredTys_maybe, getEqPredRole,
predTypeEqRel,
mkPrimEqPred, mkReprPrimEqPred, mkPrimEqPredRole,
mkHeteroPrimEqPred, mkHeteroReprPrimEqPred,
-- Class predicates
mkClassPred, isDictTy,
isClassPred, isEqPredClass, isCTupleClass,
getClassPredTys, getClassPredTys_maybe,
-- Implicit parameters
isIPPred, isIPPred_maybe, isIPTyCon, isIPClass, hasIPPred,
-- Evidence variables
DictId, isEvVar, isDictId
) where
import GHC.Prelude
import GHC.Core.Type
import GHC.Core.Class
import GHC.Core.TyCon
import GHC.Types.Var
import GHC.Core.Coercion
import GHC.Builtin.Names
import GHC.Data.FastString
import GHC.Utils.Outputable
import GHC.Utils.Misc
import Control.Monad ( guard )
-- | A predicate in the solver. The solver tries to prove Wanted predicates
-- from Given ones.
data Pred
= ClassPred Class [Type]
| EqPred EqRel Type Type
| IrredPred PredType
| ForAllPred [TyVar] [PredType] PredType
-- ForAllPred: see Note [Quantified constraints] in GHC.Tc.Solver.Canonical
-- NB: There is no TuplePred case
-- Tuple predicates like (Eq a, Ord b) are just treated
-- as ClassPred, as if we had a tuple class with two superclasses
-- class (c1, c2) => (%,%) c1 c2
classifyPredType :: PredType -> Pred
classifyPredType ev_ty = case splitTyConApp_maybe ev_ty of
Just (tc, [_, _, ty1, ty2])
| tc `hasKey` eqReprPrimTyConKey -> EqPred ReprEq ty1 ty2
| tc `hasKey` eqPrimTyConKey -> EqPred NomEq ty1 ty2
Just (tc, tys)
| Just clas <- tyConClass_maybe tc
-> ClassPred clas tys
_ | (tvs, rho) <- splitForAllTys ev_ty
, (theta, pred) <- splitFunTys rho
, not (null tvs && null theta)
-> ForAllPred tvs theta pred
| otherwise
-> IrredPred ev_ty
-- --------------------- Dictionary types ---------------------------------
mkClassPred :: Class -> [Type] -> PredType
mkClassPred clas tys = mkTyConApp (classTyCon clas) tys
isDictTy :: Type -> Bool
isDictTy = isClassPred
getClassPredTys :: HasDebugCallStack => PredType -> (Class, [Type])
getClassPredTys ty = case getClassPredTys_maybe ty of
Just (clas, tys) -> (clas, tys)
Nothing -> pprPanic "getClassPredTys" (ppr ty)
getClassPredTys_maybe :: PredType -> Maybe (Class, [Type])
getClassPredTys_maybe ty = case splitTyConApp_maybe ty of
Just (tc, tys) | Just clas <- tyConClass_maybe tc -> Just (clas, tys)
_ -> Nothing
-- --------------------- Equality predicates ---------------------------------
-- | A choice of equality relation. This is separate from the type 'Role'
-- because 'Phantom' does not define a (non-trivial) equality relation.
data EqRel = NomEq | ReprEq
deriving (Eq, Ord)
instance Outputable EqRel where
ppr NomEq = text "nominal equality"
ppr ReprEq = text "representational equality"
eqRelRole :: EqRel -> Role
eqRelRole NomEq = Nominal
eqRelRole ReprEq = Representational
getEqPredTys :: PredType -> (Type, Type)
getEqPredTys ty
= case splitTyConApp_maybe ty of
Just (tc, [_, _, ty1, ty2])
| tc `hasKey` eqPrimTyConKey
|| tc `hasKey` eqReprPrimTyConKey
-> (ty1, ty2)
_ -> pprPanic "getEqPredTys" (ppr ty)
getEqPredTys_maybe :: PredType -> Maybe (Role, Type, Type)
getEqPredTys_maybe ty
= case splitTyConApp_maybe ty of
Just (tc, [_, _, ty1, ty2])
| tc `hasKey` eqPrimTyConKey -> Just (Nominal, ty1, ty2)
| tc `hasKey` eqReprPrimTyConKey -> Just (Representational, ty1, ty2)
_ -> Nothing
getEqPredRole :: PredType -> Role
getEqPredRole ty = eqRelRole (predTypeEqRel ty)
-- | Get the equality relation relevant for a pred type.
predTypeEqRel :: PredType -> EqRel
predTypeEqRel ty
| Just (tc, _) <- splitTyConApp_maybe ty
, tc `hasKey` eqReprPrimTyConKey
= ReprEq
| otherwise
= NomEq
{-------------------------------------------
Predicates on PredType
--------------------------------------------}
{-
Note [Evidence for quantified constraints]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The superclass mechanism in GHC.Tc.Solver.Canonical.makeSuperClasses risks
taking a quantified constraint like
(forall a. C a => a ~ b)
and generate superclass evidence
(forall a. C a => a ~# b)
This is a funny thing: neither isPredTy nor isCoVarType are true
of it. So we are careful not to generate it in the first place:
see Note [Equality superclasses in quantified constraints]
in GHC.Tc.Solver.Canonical.
-}
isEvVarType :: Type -> Bool
-- True of (a) predicates, of kind Constraint, such as (Eq a), and (a ~ b)
-- (b) coercion types, such as (t1 ~# t2) or (t1 ~R# t2)
-- See Note [Types for coercions, predicates, and evidence] in GHC.Core.TyCo.Rep
-- See Note [Evidence for quantified constraints]
isEvVarType ty = isCoVarType ty || isPredTy ty
isEqPredClass :: Class -> Bool
-- True of (~) and (~~)
isEqPredClass cls = cls `hasKey` eqTyConKey
|| cls `hasKey` heqTyConKey
isClassPred, isEqPred, isEqPrimPred, isIPPred :: PredType -> Bool
isClassPred ty = case tyConAppTyCon_maybe ty of
Just tyCon | isClassTyCon tyCon -> True
_ -> False
isEqPred ty -- True of (a ~ b) and (a ~~ b)
-- ToDo: should we check saturation?
| Just tc <- tyConAppTyCon_maybe ty
, Just cls <- tyConClass_maybe tc
= isEqPredClass cls
| otherwise
= False
isEqPrimPred ty = isCoVarType ty
-- True of (a ~# b) (a ~R# b)
isIPPred ty = case tyConAppTyCon_maybe ty of
Just tc -> isIPTyCon tc
_ -> False
isIPTyCon :: TyCon -> Bool
isIPTyCon tc = tc `hasKey` ipClassKey
-- Class and its corresponding TyCon have the same Unique
isIPClass :: Class -> Bool
isIPClass cls = cls `hasKey` ipClassKey
isCTupleClass :: Class -> Bool
isCTupleClass cls = isTupleTyCon (classTyCon cls)
isIPPred_maybe :: Type -> Maybe (FastString, Type)
isIPPred_maybe ty =
do (tc,[t1,t2]) <- splitTyConApp_maybe ty
guard (isIPTyCon tc)
x <- isStrLitTy t1
return (x,t2)
hasIPPred :: PredType -> Bool
hasIPPred pred
= case classifyPredType pred of
ClassPred cls tys
| isIPClass cls -> True
| isCTupleClass cls -> any hasIPPred tys
_other -> False
{-
************************************************************************
* *
Evidence variables
* *
************************************************************************
-}
isEvVar :: Var -> Bool
isEvVar var = isEvVarType (varType var)
isDictId :: Id -> Bool
isDictId id = isDictTy (varType id)
|