1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* (c) The GHC Team, 2005-2011
*
* Macros for multi-CPU support
*
* Do not #include this file directly: #include "Rts.h" instead.
*
* To understand the structure of the RTS headers, see the wiki:
* https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/wikis/commentary/source-tree/includes
*
* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
#pragma once
#if defined(arm_HOST_ARCH) && defined(arm_HOST_ARCH_PRE_ARMv6)
void arm_atomic_spin_lock(void);
void arm_atomic_spin_unlock(void);
#endif
#if defined(THREADED_RTS)
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atomic operations
------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
#if !IN_STG_CODE || IN_STGCRUN
// We only want the barriers, e.g. write_barrier(), declared in .hc
// files. Defining the other inline functions here causes type
// mismatch errors from gcc, because the generated C code is assuming
// that there are no prototypes in scope.
/*
* The atomic exchange operation: xchg(p,w) exchanges the value
* pointed to by p with the value w, returning the old value.
*
* Used for locking closures during updates (see lockClosure()
* in includes/rts/storage/SMPClosureOps.h) and the MVar primops.
*/
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord xchg(StgPtr p, StgWord w);
/*
* Compare-and-swap. Atomically does this:
*
* cas(p,o,n) {
* r = *p;
* if (r == o) { *p = n };
* return r;
* }
*/
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord cas(StgVolatilePtr p, StgWord o, StgWord n);
/*
* Atomic addition by the provided quantity
*
* atomic_inc(p, n) {
* return ((*p) += n);
* }
*/
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord atomic_inc(StgVolatilePtr p, StgWord n);
/*
* Atomic decrement
*
* atomic_dec(p) {
* return --(*p);
* }
*/
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord atomic_dec(StgVolatilePtr p);
/*
* Busy-wait nop: this is a hint to the CPU that we are currently in a
* busy-wait loop waiting for another CPU to change something. On a
* hypertreaded CPU it should yield to another thread, for example.
*/
EXTERN_INLINE void busy_wait_nop(void);
#endif // !IN_STG_CODE
/*
* Various kinds of memory barrier.
* write_barrier: prevents future stores occurring before prededing stores.
* store_load_barrier: prevents future loads occurring before preceding stores.
* load_load_barrier: prevents future loads occurring before earlier loads.
*
* Reference for these: "The JSR-133 Cookbook for Compiler Writers"
* http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jmm/cookbook.html
*
* To check whether you got these right, try the test in
* testsuite/tests/rts/testwsdeque.c
* This tests the work-stealing deque implementation, which relies on
* properly working store_load and load_load memory barriers.
*/
EXTERN_INLINE void write_barrier(void);
EXTERN_INLINE void store_load_barrier(void);
EXTERN_INLINE void load_load_barrier(void);
/*
* Note [Heap memory barriers]
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*
* Machines with weak memory ordering semantics have consequences for how
* closures are observed and mutated. For example, consider a thunk that needs
* to be updated to an indirection. In order for the indirection to be safe for
* concurrent observers to enter, said observers must read the indirection's
* info table before they read the indirectee. Furthermore, the indirectee must
* be set before the info table pointer. This ensures that if the observer sees
* an IND info table then the indirectee is valid.
*
* When a closure is updated with an indirection, both its info table and its
* indirectee must be written. With weak memory ordering, these two writes can
* be arbitrarily reordered, and perhaps even interleaved with other threads'
* reads and writes (in the absence of memory barrier instructions). Consider
* this example of a bad reordering:
*
* - An updater writes to a closure's info table (INFO_TYPE is now IND).
* - A concurrent observer branches upon reading the closure's INFO_TYPE as IND.
* - A concurrent observer reads the closure's indirectee and enters it.
* - An updater writes the closure's indirectee.
*
* Here the update to the indirectee comes too late and the concurrent observer
* has jumped off into the abyss. Speculative execution can also cause us
* issues, consider:
*
* - an observer is about to case on a value in closure's info table.
* - the observer speculatively reads one or more of closure's fields.
* - an updater writes to closure's info table.
* - the observer takes a branch based on the new info table value, but with the
* old closure fields!
* - the updater writes to the closure's other fields, but its too late.
*
* Because of these effects, reads and writes to a closure's info table must be
* ordered carefully with respect to reads and writes to the closure's other
* fields, and memory barriers must be placed to ensure that reads and writes
* occur in program order. Specifically, updates to an already existing closure
* must follow the following pattern:
*
* - Update the closure's (non-info table) fields.
* - Write barrier.
* - Update the closure's info table.
*
* Observing the fields of an updateable closure (e.g. a THUNK) must follow the
* following pattern:
*
* - Read the closure's info pointer.
* - Read barrier.
* - Read the closure's (non-info table) fields.
*
* We must also take care when we expose a newly-allocated closure to other cores
* by writing a pointer to it to some shared data structure (e.g. an MVar#, a Message,
* or MutVar#). Specifically, we need to ensure that all writes constructing the
* closure are visible *before* the write exposing the new closure is made visible:
*
* - Allocate memory for the closure
* - Write the closure's info pointer and fields (ordering betweeen this doesn't
* matter since the closure isn't yet visible to anyone else).
* - Write barrier
* - Make closure visible to other cores
*
* Note that thread stacks are inherently thread-local and consequently allocating an
* object and introducing a reference to it to our stack needs no barrier.
*
* There are several ways in which the mutator may make a newly-allocated
* closure visible to other cores:
*
* - Eager blackholing a THUNK:
* This is protected by an explicit write barrier in the eager blackholing
* code produced by the codegen. See GHC.StgToCmm.Bind.emitBlackHoleCode.
*
* - Lazy blackholing a THUNK:
* This is is protected by an explicit write barrier in the thread suspension
* code. See ThreadPaused.c:threadPaused.
*
* - Updating a BLACKHOLE:
* This case is protected by explicit write barriers in the the update frame
* entry code (see rts/Updates.h).
*
* - Blocking on an MVar# (e.g. takeMVar#):
* In this case the appropriate MVar primops (e.g. stg_takeMVarzh). include
* explicit memory barriers to ensure that the the newly-allocated
* MVAR_TSO_QUEUE is visible to other cores.
*
* - Write to an MVar# (e.g. putMVar#):
* This protected by the full barrier implied by the CAS in putMVar#.
*
* - Write to a TVar#:
* This is protected by the full barrier implied by the CAS in STM.c:lock_stm.
*
* - Write to an Array#, ArrayArray#, or SmallArray#:
* This case is protected by an explicit write barrier in the code produced
* for this primop by the codegen. See GHC.StgToCmm.Prim.doWritePtrArrayOp and
* GHC.StgToCmm.Prim.doWriteSmallPtrArrayOp. Relevant issue: #12469.
*
* - Write to MutVar# via writeMutVar#:
* This case is protected by an explicit write barrier in the code produced
* for this primop by the codegen.
*
* - Write to MutVar# via atomicModifyMutVar# or casMutVar#:
* This is protected by the full barrier implied by the cmpxchg operations
* in this primops.
*
* - Sending a Message to another capability:
* This is protected by the acquition and release of the target capability's
* lock in Messages.c:sendMessage.
*
* Finally, we must ensure that we flush all cores store buffers before
* entering and leaving GC, since stacks may be read by other cores. This
* happens as a side-effect of taking and release mutexes (which implies
* acquire and release barriers, respectively).
*
* N.B. recordClosureMutated places a reference to the mutated object on
* the capability-local mut_list. Consequently this does not require any memory
* barrier.
*
* During parallel GC we need to be careful during evacuation: before replacing
* a closure with a forwarding pointer we must commit a write barrier to ensure
* that the copy we made in to-space is visible to other cores.
*
* However, we can be a bit lax when *reading* during GC. Specifically, the GC
* can only make a very limited set of changes to existing closures:
*
* - it can replace a closure's info table with stg_WHITEHOLE.
* - it can replace a previously-whitehole'd closure's info table with a
* forwarding pointer
* - it can replace a previously-whitehole'd closure's info table with a
* valid info table pointer (done in eval_thunk_selector)
* - it can update the value of a pointer field after evacuating it
*
* This is quite nice since we don't need to worry about an interleaving
* of writes producing an invalid state: a closure's fields remain valid after
* an update of its info table pointer and vice-versa.
*
* After a round of parallel scavenging we must also ensure that any writes the
* GC thread workers made are visible to the main GC thread. This is ensured by
* the full barrier implied by the atomic decrement in
* GC.c:scavenge_until_all_done.
*
* The work-stealing queue (WSDeque) also requires barriers; these are
* documented in WSDeque.c.
*
*/
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementations
------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
#if !IN_STG_CODE || IN_STGCRUN
/*
* Exchange the value pointed to by p with w and return the former. This
* function is used to acquire a lock. An acquire memory barrier is sufficient
* for a lock operation because corresponding unlock operation issues a
* store-store barrier (write_barrier()) immediately before releasing the lock.
*/
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord
xchg(StgPtr p, StgWord w)
{
// When porting GHC to a new platform check that
// __sync_lock_test_and_set() actually stores w in *p.
// Use test rts/atomicxchg to verify that the correct value is stored.
// From the gcc manual:
// (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.3/gcc/Atomic-Builtins.html)
// This built-in function, as described by Intel, is not
// a traditional test-and-set operation, but rather an atomic
// exchange operation.
// [...]
// Many targets have only minimal support for such locks,
// and do not support a full exchange operation. In this case,
// a target may support reduced functionality here by which the
// only valid value to store is the immediate constant 1. The
// exact value actually stored in *ptr is implementation defined.
return __sync_lock_test_and_set(p, w);
}
/*
* CMPXCHG - the single-word atomic compare-and-exchange instruction. Used
* in the STM implementation.
*/
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord
cas(StgVolatilePtr p, StgWord o, StgWord n)
{
return __sync_val_compare_and_swap(p, o, n);
}
// RRN: Generalized to arbitrary increments to enable fetch-and-add in
// Haskell code (fetchAddIntArray#).
// PT: add-and-fetch, returns new value
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord
atomic_inc(StgVolatilePtr p, StgWord incr)
{
return __sync_add_and_fetch(p, incr);
}
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord
atomic_dec(StgVolatilePtr p)
{
return __sync_sub_and_fetch(p, (StgWord) 1);
}
/*
* Some architectures have a way to tell the CPU that we're in a
* busy-wait loop, and the processor should look for something else to
* do (such as run another hardware thread).
*/
EXTERN_INLINE void
busy_wait_nop(void)
{
#if defined(i386_HOST_ARCH) || defined(x86_64_HOST_ARCH)
// On Intel, the busy-wait-nop instruction is called "pause",
// which is actually represented as a nop with the rep prefix.
// On processors before the P4 this behaves as a nop; on P4 and
// later it might do something clever like yield to another
// hyperthread. In any case, Intel recommends putting one
// of these in a spin lock loop.
__asm__ __volatile__ ("rep; nop");
#else
// nothing
#endif
}
#endif // !IN_STG_CODE
/*
* We need to tell both the compiler AND the CPU about the barriers.
* It's no good preventing the CPU from reordering the operations if
* the compiler has already done so - hence the "memory" restriction
* on each of the barriers below.
*/
EXTERN_INLINE void
write_barrier(void) {
#if defined(NOSMP)
return;
#elif defined(i386_HOST_ARCH) || defined(x86_64_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(powerpc_HOST_ARCH) || defined(powerpc64_HOST_ARCH) \
|| defined(powerpc64le_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("lwsync" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(s390x_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(sparc_HOST_ARCH)
/* Sparc in TSO mode does not require store/store barriers. */
__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(arm_HOST_ARCH) || defined(aarch64_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb st" : : : "memory");
#else
#error memory barriers unimplemented on this architecture
#endif
}
EXTERN_INLINE void
store_load_barrier(void) {
#if defined(NOSMP)
return;
#elif defined(i386_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(x86_64_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("lock; addq $0,0(%%rsp)" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(powerpc_HOST_ARCH) || defined(powerpc64_HOST_ARCH) \
|| defined(powerpc64le_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(s390x_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("bcr 14,0" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(sparc_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("membar #StoreLoad" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(arm_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(aarch64_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb sy" : : : "memory");
#else
#error memory barriers unimplemented on this architecture
#endif
}
EXTERN_INLINE void
load_load_barrier(void) {
#if defined(NOSMP)
return;
#elif defined(i386_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(x86_64_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(powerpc_HOST_ARCH) || defined(powerpc64_HOST_ARCH) \
|| defined(powerpc64le_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("lwsync" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(s390x_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(sparc_HOST_ARCH)
/* Sparc in TSO mode does not require load/load barriers. */
__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(arm_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb" : : : "memory");
#elif defined(aarch64_HOST_ARCH)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb sy" : : : "memory");
#else
#error memory barriers unimplemented on this architecture
#endif
}
// Load a pointer from a memory location that might be being modified
// concurrently. This prevents the compiler from optimising away
// multiple loads of the memory location, as it might otherwise do in
// a busy wait loop for example.
#define VOLATILE_LOAD(p) (*((StgVolatilePtr)(p)))
/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
#else /* !THREADED_RTS */
EXTERN_INLINE void write_barrier(void);
EXTERN_INLINE void store_load_barrier(void);
EXTERN_INLINE void load_load_barrier(void);
EXTERN_INLINE void write_barrier () {} /* nothing */
EXTERN_INLINE void store_load_barrier() {} /* nothing */
EXTERN_INLINE void load_load_barrier () {} /* nothing */
#if !IN_STG_CODE || IN_STGCRUN
INLINE_HEADER StgWord
xchg(StgPtr p, StgWord w)
{
StgWord old = *p;
*p = w;
return old;
}
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord cas(StgVolatilePtr p, StgWord o, StgWord n);
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord
cas(StgVolatilePtr p, StgWord o, StgWord n)
{
StgWord result;
result = *p;
if (result == o) {
*p = n;
}
return result;
}
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord atomic_inc(StgVolatilePtr p, StgWord incr);
EXTERN_INLINE StgWord
atomic_inc(StgVolatilePtr p, StgWord incr)
{
return ((*p) += incr);
}
INLINE_HEADER StgWord
atomic_dec(StgVolatilePtr p)
{
return --(*p);
}
#endif
#define VOLATILE_LOAD(p) ((StgWord)*((StgWord*)(p)))
#endif /* !THREADED_RTS */
|