blob: 179ff4f5aa2cd4a375b53b48391d03e95e3b93fc (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
|
T7848.hs:6:57:
Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type:
t2 ~ t0 -> t -> t1 -> A -> A -> A -> A -> t2
Relevant bindings include
y :: forall t3. t3 -> t -> t1 -> A -> A -> A -> A -> t2
(bound at T7848.hs:8:9)
(&) :: t -> t1 -> A -> A -> A -> A -> t2 (bound at T7848.hs:11:9)
z :: t1 (bound at T7848.hs:6:12)
(&) :: t1 (bound at T7848.hs:6:8)
(+) :: t (bound at T7848.hs:6:3)
x :: t -> t1 -> A -> A -> A -> A -> t2 (bound at T7848.hs:6:1)
In the expression: y
In an equation for ‘x’:
x (+) ((&)@z) ((:&&) a b) (c :&& d) (e `A` f) (A g h)
= y
where
infixl 3 `y`
y _ = (&)
{-# INLINE (&) #-}
{-# SPECIALIZE (&) :: a #-}
(&) = x
T7848.hs:10:9:
Couldn't match type ‘a’ with ‘t -> t1 -> A -> A -> A -> A -> t2’
‘a’ is a rigid type variable bound by
the type signature for: (&) :: a at T7848.hs:10:9
Expected type: forall a. a
Actual type: t -> t1 -> A -> A -> A -> A -> t2
Relevant bindings include
z :: t1 (bound at T7848.hs:6:12)
(&) :: t1 (bound at T7848.hs:6:8)
(+) :: t (bound at T7848.hs:6:3)
x :: t -> t1 -> A -> A -> A -> A -> t2 (bound at T7848.hs:6:1)
When checking that: t -> t1 -> A -> A -> A -> A -> t2
is more polymorphic than: forall a. a
In the SPECIALISE pragma {-# SPECIALIZE (&) :: a #-}
In an equation for ‘x’:
x (+) ((&)@z) ((:&&) a b) (c :&& d) (e `A` f) (A g h)
= y
where
infixl 3 `y`
y _ = (&)
{-# INLINE (&) #-}
{-# SPECIALIZE (&) :: a #-}
(&) = x
|
