summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T15883c.stderr
blob: 4ef9e5ef52dc122019c787efea2aab49f9b23524 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43

T15883c.hs:14:1: error:
    • No instance for (Eq (Foo ('BoxedRep 'Lifted)))
        arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration
    • In the instance declaration for ‘Ord (Foo ('BoxedRep 'Lifted))’

T15883c.hs:14:1: error:
    • Ambiguous type variable ‘a0’ arising from a use of ‘compare’
      prevents the constraint ‘(Ord a0)’ from being solved.
      Probable fix: use a type annotation to specify what ‘a0’ should be.
      These potential instances exist:
        instance Ord Ordering -- Defined in ‘GHC.Classes’
        instance Ord (Foo ('BoxedRep 'Lifted))
          -- Defined at T15883c.hs:14:1
        instance Ord Integer -- Defined in ‘GHC.Num.Integer’
        ...plus 23 others
        ...plus two instances involving out-of-scope types
        (use -fprint-potential-instances to see them all)
    • In the expression: a1 `compare` b1
      In a case alternative: MkFoo b1 -> (a1 `compare` b1)
      In the expression: case b of MkFoo b1 -> (a1 `compare` b1)
      When typechecking the code for ‘compare’
        in a derived instance for ‘Ord (Foo ('BoxedRep 'Lifted))’:
        To see the code I am typechecking, use -ddump-deriv

T15883c.hs:14:1: error:
    • Ambiguous type variable ‘a1’ arising from a use of ‘<’
      prevents the constraint ‘(Ord a1)’ from being solved.
      Probable fix: use a type annotation to specify what ‘a1’ should be.
      These potential instances exist:
        instance Ord Ordering -- Defined in ‘GHC.Classes’
        instance Ord (Foo ('BoxedRep 'Lifted))
          -- Defined at T15883c.hs:14:1
        instance Ord Integer -- Defined in ‘GHC.Num.Integer’
        ...plus 23 others
        ...plus two instances involving out-of-scope types
        (use -fprint-potential-instances to see them all)
    • In the expression: a1 < b1
      In a case alternative: MkFoo b1 -> (a1 < b1)
      In the expression: case b of MkFoo b1 -> (a1 < b1)
      When typechecking the code for ‘<’
        in a derived instance for ‘Ord (Foo ('BoxedRep 'Lifted))’:
        To see the code I am typechecking, use -ddump-deriv