| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From the libseccomp-discuss mailing list:
On Monday, April 09, 2012 06:06:51 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It was suggested on the libseccomp announcement thread that we
> relicense the library from GPLv2 to LGPLv2.1. In my opinion this
> makes sense and I recommend we relicense the library, can I have
> your permission to relicense your contributions?
>
> * LGPLv2.1
> -> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:07:37 AM Eric Paris wrote:
> You have my permission to relicense to LGPL.
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:27:39 AM Ashley Lai wrote:
> Yes, you have my permission to relicense to LGPL.
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 11:48:14 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
> We (IBM) have OSSC approval now. You have my approval to
> relicense my contributions to LGPLv2.1.
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 12:57:25 PM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:48:14AM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote:
> > We (IBM) have OSSC approval now. You have my approval to
> > relicense my contributions to LGPLv2.1.
>
> Exactly, not a problem for me.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
|
