diff options
author | Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> | 2016-12-05 18:27:38 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> | 2016-12-20 16:29:04 +0200 |
commit | dccf82ad1775f2b9c36ec85e25e39d88c7e86818 (patch) | |
tree | 476fb878f6c5e265df9ad40dd11237ab262c19f4 /drivers/gpu | |
parent | 2c7d0602c815277f7cb7c932b091288710d8aba7 (diff) | |
download | linux-next-dccf82ad1775f2b9c36ec85e25e39d88c7e86818.tar.gz |
drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during SAGV disabling
According to the previous patch, it's possible atm that we call
intel_do_sagv_disable() only once during the 1ms period and time out if
that call fails. As opposed to this the spec says that we need to keep
retrying this request for a 1ms duration, so let's do this similarly to
the CDCLK change notification request.
v4-5:
- Rebased on the reply_mask, reply change.
v6:
- Remove w/s change. (Lyude)
- Rebased on the timeout_base argument change.
Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fixes: 656d1b89e5ff ("drm/i915/skl: Add support for the SAGV, fix underrun hangs")
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude <lyude@redhat.com> (v4)
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1480955258-26311-2-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit b3b8e99984a4eace91bc097e8f8cec71441cae16)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 34 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 90e42e094b13..1377679ac109 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2964,24 +2964,10 @@ intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) return 0; } -static int -intel_do_sagv_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) -{ - int ret; - uint32_t temp = GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE; - - ret = sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv, GEN9_PCODE_SAGV_CONTROL, - &temp); - if (ret) - return ret; - else - return temp & GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED; -} - int intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - int ret, result; + int ret; if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv)) return 0; @@ -2993,25 +2979,23 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); /* bspec says to keep retrying for at least 1 ms */ - ret = wait_for(result = intel_do_sagv_disable(dev_priv), 1); + ret = skl_pcode_request(dev_priv, GEN9_PCODE_SAGV_CONTROL, + GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE, + GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED, GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED, + 1); mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); - if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) { - DRM_ERROR("Request to disable SAGV timed out\n"); - return -ETIMEDOUT; - } - /* * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular, * don't actually have an SAGV. */ - if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && result == -ENXIO) { + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && ret == -ENXIO) { DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; return 0; - } else if (result < 0) { - DRM_ERROR("Failed to disable the SAGV\n"); - return result; + } else if (ret < 0) { + DRM_ERROR("Failed to disable the SAGV (%d)\n", ret); + return ret; } dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_DISABLED; |