summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/jbd2
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>2012-01-10 11:54:07 -0500
committerTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>2012-01-10 11:54:07 -0500
commitff9cb1c4eead5e4c292e75cd3170a82d66944101 (patch)
treecdb132a39e550a9b7b28ea67544cb86cd6ebdb6e /fs/jbd2
parente4e11180dfa545233e5145919b75b7fac88638df (diff)
parentd50f2ab6f050311dbf7b8f5501b25f0bf64a439b (diff)
downloadlinux-next-ff9cb1c4eead5e4c292e75cd3170a82d66944101.tar.gz
Merge branch 'for_linus' into for_linus_merged
Conflicts: fs/ext4/ioctl.c
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jbd2')
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd2/commit.c6
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd2/revoke.c34
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd2/transaction.c5
3 files changed, 43 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
index 68d704db787f..5069b8475150 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
@@ -430,6 +430,12 @@ void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 1\n");
/*
+ * Clear revoked flag to reflect there is no revoked buffers
+ * in the next transaction which is going to be started.
+ */
+ jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal);
+
+ /*
* Switch to a new revoke table.
*/
jbd2_journal_switch_revoke_table(journal);
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
index 69fd93588118..30b2867d6cc9 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
@@ -47,6 +47,10 @@
* overwriting the new data. We don't even need to clear the revoke
* bit here.
*
+ * We cache revoke status of a buffer in the current transaction in b_states
+ * bits. As the name says, revokevalid flag indicates that the cached revoke
+ * status of a buffer is valid and we can rely on the cached status.
+ *
* Revoke information on buffers is a tri-state value:
*
* RevokeValid clear: no cached revoke status, need to look it up
@@ -478,6 +482,36 @@ int jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh)
return did_revoke;
}
+/*
+ * journal_clear_revoked_flag clears revoked flag of buffers in
+ * revoke table to reflect there is no revoked buffers in the next
+ * transaction which is going to be started.
+ */
+void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal)
+{
+ struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *revoke = journal->j_revoke;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < revoke->hash_size; i++) {
+ struct list_head *hash_list;
+ struct list_head *list_entry;
+ hash_list = &revoke->hash_table[i];
+
+ list_for_each(list_entry, hash_list) {
+ struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *record;
+ struct buffer_head *bh;
+ record = (struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *)list_entry;
+ bh = __find_get_block(journal->j_fs_dev,
+ record->blocknr,
+ journal->j_blocksize);
+ if (bh) {
+ clear_buffer_revoked(bh);
+ __brelse(bh);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
/* journal_switch_revoke table select j_revoke for next transaction
* we do not want to suspend any processing until all revokes are
* written -bzzz
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index a0e41a4c080e..35ae096bed5d 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -517,12 +517,13 @@ void jbd2_journal_lock_updates(journal_t *journal)
break;
spin_lock(&transaction->t_handle_lock);
+ prepare_to_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (!atomic_read(&transaction->t_updates)) {
spin_unlock(&transaction->t_handle_lock);
+ finish_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait);
break;
}
- prepare_to_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait,
- TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
spin_unlock(&transaction->t_handle_lock);
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
schedule();