diff options
| author | Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@docker.com> | 2016-05-04 14:21:53 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2016-05-18 17:04:01 -0700 |
| commit | a70f3ad276ddeccce63da71e555906af0a4a310a (patch) | |
| tree | 0b14af1660acf6debdc25b8a1ee8f2be0a109a18 /net | |
| parent | c1e797692b97ec480bc0e940cc022823e3cc40c9 (diff) | |
| download | linux-rt-a70f3ad276ddeccce63da71e555906af0a4a310a.tar.gz | |
VSOCK: do not disconnect socket when peer has shutdown SEND only
[ Upstream commit dedc58e067d8c379a15a8a183c5db318201295bb ]
The peer may be expecting a reply having sent a request and then done a
shutdown(SHUT_WR), so tearing down the whole socket at this point seems
wrong and breaks for me with a client which does a SHUT_WR.
Looking at other socket family's stream_recvmsg callbacks doing a shutdown
here does not seem to be the norm and removing it does not seem to have
had any adverse effects that I can see.
I'm using Stefan's RFC virtio transport patches, I'm unsure of the impact
on the vmci transport.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@docker.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy King <acking@vmware.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
Cc: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Cc: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index 85d232bed87d..e8d3313ea2c9 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -1796,27 +1796,8 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *kiocb, else if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) err = 0; - if (copied > 0) { - /* We only do these additional bookkeeping/notification steps - * if we actually copied something out of the queue pair - * instead of just peeking ahead. - */ - - if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) { - /* If the other side has shutdown for sending and there - * is nothing more to read, then modify the socket - * state. - */ - if (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) { - if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) <= 0) { - sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED; - sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE); - sk->sk_state_change(sk); - } - } - } + if (copied > 0) err = copied; - } out_wait: finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); |