summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/staging/gma500/power.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* gma500: Fix up suspend/resumeAlan Cox2011-08-261-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | This isn't ideal as we could do with deferring the power on a lot more on Oaktrail and Medfield. We can't however do that without fixing other things first. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* gma500: Fix backlight crashAlan Cox2011-08-261-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Initial changes to get backlight behaviour we want and to fix backlight crashes on suspend/resume paths. [Note: on some boxes this will now produce a warning about the backlight, this isn't a regression it's an unfixed but non harmful case I still need to nail] Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* gma500: remove the legacy PM methodOctavian Purdila2011-07-151-4/+5
| | | | | | | | | | PCI core only prefer one of legacy PM and new PM. And since runtime pm is implemented, which requires the new PM method, we should remove the legacy PM method. Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* gma500: power can be touched in IRQ stateAlan Cox2011-07-051-8/+10
| | | | | | | So we need to use a spinlock here Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* gma500: move the power headerAlan Cox2011-07-051-1/+1
| | | | | | | | At this point we now have the file naming making somewhat more sense although the dependancies are not as clean as would be ideal Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* gma500: tidying up the power stuff a spotAlan Cox2011-07-051-20/+13
| | | | | | | In particular don't destroy static mutexes, it upsets things Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* gma500: being abstracting out devices a bit moreAlan Cox2011-07-051-0/+320
We really want to move towards a completely abstracted interface rather than having tons of per chip junk in the same files. Begin with the power code which is probably the worst offender. Add a set of methods, initialise a dev_priv->ops pointer and rip the chip specifics out of the power code. While we are it pick up the display init bits. So we know it's now chip specifics clean remove the psb_ naming from it. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
View Lorry Controller Status