From 76739be851b4fd112f28dd7c2aaff136def09d64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:03:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Use SA_SHIRQ in sparc specific code. Based upon a report from Jason Wever. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Chris Wright Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/char/rtc.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/rtc.c b/drivers/char/rtc.c index cd4fe8b1709f..63fff7c1244a 100644 --- a/drivers/char/rtc.c +++ b/drivers/char/rtc.c @@ -938,10 +938,9 @@ found: /* * XXX Interrupt pin #7 in Espresso is shared between RTC and - * PCI Slot 2 INTA# (and some INTx# in Slot 1). SA_INTERRUPT here - * is asking for trouble with add-on boards. Change to SA_SHIRQ. + * PCI Slot 2 INTA# (and some INTx# in Slot 1). */ - if (request_irq(rtc_irq, rtc_interrupt, SA_INTERRUPT, "rtc", (void *)&rtc_port)) { + if (request_irq(rtc_irq, rtc_interrupt, SA_SHIRQ, "rtc", (void *)&rtc_port)) { /* * Standard way for sparc to print irq's is to use * __irq_itoa(). I think for EBus it's ok to use %d. -- cgit v1.2.1