1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
|
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:21:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 26/35] mm, slub: only disable irq with spin_lock in
__unfreeze_partials()
__unfreeze_partials() no longer needs to have irqs disabled, except for making
the spin_lock operations irq-safe, so convert the spin_locks operations and
remove the separate irq handling.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
mm/slub.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2338,9 +2338,7 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct k
{
struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL, *n2 = NULL;
struct page *page, *discard_page = NULL;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- local_irq_save(flags);
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
while (partial_page) {
struct page new;
@@ -2352,10 +2350,10 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct k
n2 = get_node(s, page_to_nid(page));
if (n != n2) {
if (n)
- spin_unlock(&n->list_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
n = n2;
- spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
}
do {
@@ -2384,9 +2382,7 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct k
}
if (n)
- spin_unlock(&n->list_lock);
-
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
while (discard_page) {
page = discard_page;
|
