blob: b1baf00bdec8b1e8737541c349ea8bc54fc6e779 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
|
Subject: net: Use cpu_chill() instead of cpu_relax()
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:10:04 +0100
Retry loops on RT might loop forever when the modifying side was
preempted. Use cpu_chill() instead of cpu_relax() to let the system
make progress.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
#include <linux/if_packet.h>
#include <linux/wireless.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/kmod.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
@@ -660,7 +661,7 @@ static void prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expi
if (BLOCK_NUM_PKTS(pbd)) {
while (atomic_read(&pkc->blk_fill_in_prog)) {
/* Waiting for skb_copy_bits to finish... */
- cpu_relax();
+ cpu_chill();
}
}
@@ -922,7 +923,7 @@ static void prb_retire_current_block(str
if (!(status & TP_STATUS_BLK_TMO)) {
while (atomic_read(&pkc->blk_fill_in_prog)) {
/* Waiting for skb_copy_bits to finish... */
- cpu_relax();
+ cpu_chill();
}
}
prb_close_block(pkc, pbd, po, status);
|