From 6bef4d317193d3badbbfa3f3c593758ace84a629 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Paris Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:43:04 +0000 Subject: Btrfs: use RB_ROOT to intialize rb_trees instead of setting rb_node to NULL btrfs inialize rb trees in quite a number of places by settin rb_node = NULL; The problem with this is that 17d9ddc72fb8bba0d4f678 in the linux-next tree adds a new field to that struct which needs to be NULL for the new rbtree library code to work properly. This patch uses RB_ROOT as the intializer so all of the relevant fields will be NULL'd. Without the patch I get a panic. Signed-off-by: Eric Paris Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent_io.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index b177ed319612..7073cbb1b2d4 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ void extent_io_exit(void) void extent_io_tree_init(struct extent_io_tree *tree, struct address_space *mapping, gfp_t mask) { - tree->state.rb_node = NULL; - tree->buffer.rb_node = NULL; + tree->state = RB_ROOT; + tree->buffer = RB_ROOT; tree->ops = NULL; tree->dirty_bytes = 0; spin_lock_init(&tree->lock); -- cgit v1.2.1