Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | powerpc: Standardise on NR_syscalls rather than __NR_syscalls. | Rashmica Gupta | 2015-11-26 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of syscalls. We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_syscalls. __NR_syscalls is not used outside arch code, whereas NR_syscalls is. So as NR_syscalls must be defined and __NR_syscalls does not, replace __NR_syscalls with NR_syscalls. Signed-off-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmicy@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> | ||||
* | [POWERPC] Fix a couple of copyright symbols | Stephen Rothwell | 2008-01-25 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> | ||||
* | [POWERPC] Check that the syscall table matches the syscall numbers | Stephen Rothwell | 2008-01-17 | 1 | -0/+33 |
Also check that __NR_syscalls has been updated appropriately. Hopefully this will catch any out of order additions to the table in the future. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> |