| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add support Winbond w25q{64,128,256}jwm which are identical to existing
w25q32jwm except for their sizes.
This was tested with w25q64jwm, basic erase/write/readback and
lock/unlock both lower/upper blocks were okay.
Signed-off-by: ikjn@chromium.org <ikjn@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Xingyu Wu <wuxy@bitland.corp-partner.google.com>
Signed-off-by: ST Lin <stlin2@winbond.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200928060631.2090541-1-ikjn@chromium.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both w25q64 and s25fl064k nor flash support QUAD and DUAL read
command, hence update the same in flash_info table.
This is tested on Broadcom Stingray SoC (bcm958742t).
s25fl064k and w25q64 share the same JEDEC ID. The search alg will
return the first hit, so s25fl064k even for the winbond parts. We
should differentiate between these flashes, but it's not in the
scope of this patch. Related discussion at:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/628090/
Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200529071655.739-1-rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com
[tudor.ambarus@microchip.com: Update commit message and indicate that
s25fl064k and w25q64 share the same JEDEC ID]
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This chip is (nearly) identical to the Winbond w25q64 which is
already supported by Linux. Compared to the w25q64, the 'jvm'
has a different JEDEC ID.
Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
[tudor.ambarus@microchip.com: Order entry alphabetically, update
subject, update Sven's email address]
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200629195306.1030-1-TheSven73@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are 2 different chips (w25q256fv and w25q256jv) that share
the same JEDEC ID. Only w25q256jv fully supports 4-byte opcodes.
Use SFDP header version to differentiate between them.
Fixes: 10050a02f7d5 ("mtd: spi-nor: Add 4B_OPCODES flag to w25q256")
Signed-off-by: Mantas Pucka <mantas@8devices.com>
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The SPI NOR controllers drivers must not be able to use structures that
are meant just for the SPI NOR core.
struct spi_nor_flash_parameter is filled at run-time with info gathered
from flash_info, manufacturer and sfdp data. struct spi_nor_flash_parameter
should be opaque to the SPI NOR controller drivers, make sure it is.
spi_nor_option_flags, spi_nor_read_command, spi_nor_pp_command,
spi_nor_read_command_index and spi_nor_pp_command_index are defined for the
core use, make sure they are opaque to the SPI NOR controller drivers.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
|
|
|
Create a SPI NOR manufacturer driver for Winbond chips, and move the
Winbond definitions outside of core.c.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
|
