summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorunknown <gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz>2007-09-14 17:43:14 +0300
committerunknown <gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz>2007-09-14 17:43:14 +0300
commitad496be0630b07c1d14a27e76bc801c4fa38f5b3 (patch)
treea8c28f958e07344f8f172af3117dd3ff1860dd47
parentaa5da0fc9ec4b90ae6ba8ad17334bc67d40bf66e (diff)
downloadmariadb-git-ad496be0630b07c1d14a27e76bc801c4fa38f5b3.tar.gz
Bug #31001: ORDER BY DESC in InnoDB not working
The optimizer sets index traversal in reverse order only if there are used key parts that are not compared to a constant. However using the primary key as an ORDER BY suffix rendered the check incomplete : going in reverse order must still be used even if all the parts of the secondary key are compared to a constant. Fixed by relaxing the check and set reverse traversal even when all the secondary index keyparts are compared to a const. Also account for the case when all the primary keys are compared to a constant. mysql-test/r/innodb_mysql.result: Bug #31001: test case mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql.test: Bug #31001: test case sql/sql_select.cc: Bug #31001: - account for the case when all the primary key parts are compared to a constant - force test_if_skip_sort_order to go backwards over the key even when the number of keyparts used is the same as the number of keyparts equal to a constant. (because of the primary key suffix).
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/r/innodb_mysql.result97
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql.test23
-rw-r--r--sql/sql_select.cc8
3 files changed, 127 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mysql-test/r/innodb_mysql.result b/mysql-test/r/innodb_mysql.result
index be678efd0ef..d5f014b6840 100644
--- a/mysql-test/r/innodb_mysql.result
+++ b/mysql-test/r/innodb_mysql.result
@@ -1114,4 +1114,101 @@ c b
3 1
3 2
DROP TABLE t1;
+CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT, b INT, PRIMARY KEY (a), INDEX b (b)) ENGINE=InnoDB;
+INSERT INTO t1(a,b) VALUES (1,1), (2,2), (3,2);
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=2 ORDER BY a ASC;
+id 1
+select_type SIMPLE
+table t1
+type ref
+possible_keys b
+key b
+key_len 5
+ref const
+rows 1
+Extra Using where; Using index
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=2 ORDER BY a ASC;
+a b
+2 2
+3 2
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=2 ORDER BY a DESC;
+id 1
+select_type SIMPLE
+table t1
+type ref
+possible_keys b
+key b
+key_len 5
+ref const
+rows 1
+Extra Using where; Using index
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=2 ORDER BY a DESC;
+a b
+3 2
+2 2
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC, a ASC;
+id 1
+select_type SIMPLE
+table t1
+type index
+possible_keys NULL
+key b
+key_len 5
+ref NULL
+rows 3
+Extra Using index
+SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC, a ASC;
+a b
+1 1
+2 2
+3 2
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a DESC;
+id 1
+select_type SIMPLE
+table t1
+type index
+possible_keys NULL
+key b
+key_len 5
+ref NULL
+rows 3
+Extra Using index
+SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a DESC;
+a b
+3 2
+2 2
+1 1
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC, a DESC;
+id 1
+select_type SIMPLE
+table t1
+type index
+possible_keys NULL
+key b
+key_len 5
+ref NULL
+rows 3
+Extra Using index; Using filesort
+SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC, a DESC;
+a b
+1 1
+3 2
+2 2
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a ASC;
+id 1
+select_type SIMPLE
+table t1
+type index
+possible_keys NULL
+key b
+key_len 5
+ref NULL
+rows 3
+Extra Using index; Using filesort
+SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a ASC;
+a b
+2 2
+3 2
+1 1
+DROP TABLE t1;
End of 5.0 tests
diff --git a/mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql.test b/mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql.test
index c39c88096c4..f64efd600c5 100644
--- a/mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql.test
+++ b/mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql.test
@@ -937,4 +937,27 @@ SELECT c,b FROM t1 GROUP BY c,b;
DROP TABLE t1;
+#
+# Bug #31001: ORDER BY DESC in InnoDB not working
+#
+CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT, b INT, PRIMARY KEY (a), INDEX b (b)) ENGINE=InnoDB;
+INSERT INTO t1(a,b) VALUES (1,1), (2,2), (3,2);
+
+#The two queries below should produce different results, but they don't.
+query_vertical EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=2 ORDER BY a ASC;
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=2 ORDER BY a ASC;
+query_vertical EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=2 ORDER BY a DESC;
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=2 ORDER BY a DESC;
+
+query_vertical EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC, a ASC;
+SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC, a ASC;
+query_vertical EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a DESC;
+SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a DESC;
+query_vertical EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC, a DESC;
+SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC, a DESC;
+query_vertical EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a ASC;
+SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a ASC;
+
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
--echo End of 5.0 tests
diff --git a/sql/sql_select.cc b/sql/sql_select.cc
index bd93a7ae203..453bf7c3b63 100644
--- a/sql/sql_select.cc
+++ b/sql/sql_select.cc
@@ -12063,6 +12063,12 @@ static int test_if_order_by_key(ORDER *order, TABLE *table, uint idx,
for (; const_key_parts & 1 ; const_key_parts>>= 1)
key_part++;
+ /*
+ The primary and secondary key parts were all const (i.e. there's
+ one row). The sorting doesn't matter.
+ */
+ if (key_part == key_part_end && reverse == 0)
+ DBUG_RETURN(1);
}
else
DBUG_RETURN(0);
@@ -12480,7 +12486,7 @@ test_if_skip_sort_order(JOIN_TAB *tab,ORDER *order,ha_rows select_limit,
}
DBUG_RETURN(1);
}
- if (tab->ref.key_parts < used_key_parts)
+ if (tab->ref.key_parts <= used_key_parts)
{
/*
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=1 ORDER BY a DESC,b DESC