diff options
author | Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com> | 2009-12-03 00:08:51 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com> | 2009-12-03 00:08:51 +0300 |
commit | 9148af5cdbd6baacc7721c8e6fd40465e9cdce1e (patch) | |
tree | 8b7b258a2fb363522498fef4543086cd3b3cb508 | |
parent | 77cbfd85ee3f6969dcbe528a2f97ec12c9cf99dc (diff) | |
download | mariadb-git-9148af5cdbd6baacc7721c8e6fd40465e9cdce1e.tar.gz |
Backport of:
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.36
committer: Konstantin Osipov <konstantin@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726
timestamp: Wed 2008-06-25 17:03:37 +0400
message:
As per discussion with Serg and Dmitri, remove the code
that is trying to emulate LOCK TABLES when locking tables for prelocking.
This code was worked around by the engines, and has no effect.
We may still have to do something to ensure that statement-based
replication is consistent in MVCC engines, or other engines
that downgrade table level locks, but this will have to be done
somehow differently.
sql/sql_base.cc:
Do not try to emulate LOCK TABLES when locking tables for
pre-locking.
-rw-r--r-- | sql/sql_base.cc | 20 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/sql/sql_base.cc b/sql/sql_base.cc index 7803bd0ba11..17b4360c8f9 100644 --- a/sql/sql_base.cc +++ b/sql/sql_base.cc @@ -1335,7 +1335,6 @@ void close_thread_tables(THD *thd, bool skip_mdl) { TABLE *table; - bool clear_table_lock_option= FALSE; DBUG_ENTER("close_thread_tables"); #ifdef EXTRA_DEBUG @@ -1428,7 +1427,6 @@ void close_thread_tables(THD *thd, DBUG_VOID_RETURN; thd->locked_tables_mode= LTM_NONE; - clear_table_lock_option= TRUE; /* Note that we are leaving prelocked mode so we don't need @@ -1467,10 +1465,6 @@ void close_thread_tables(THD *thd, { mdl_remove_all_locks(&thd->mdl_context); } - - if (clear_table_lock_option) - thd->options&= ~OPTION_TABLE_LOCK; - DBUG_VOID_RETURN; } @@ -4842,8 +4836,6 @@ int lock_tables(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables, uint count, /* We have to emulate LOCK TABLES if we are statement needs prelocking. */ if (thd->lex->requires_prelocking()) { - thd->in_lock_tables=1; - thd->options|= OPTION_TABLE_LOCK; /* A query that modifies autoinc column in sub-statement can make the master and slave inconsistent. @@ -4863,14 +4855,7 @@ int lock_tables(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables, uint count, if (! (thd->lock= mysql_lock_tables(thd, start, (uint) (ptr - start), flags, need_reopen))) - { - if (thd->lex->requires_prelocking()) - { - thd->options&= ~(OPTION_TABLE_LOCK); - thd->in_lock_tables=0; - } DBUG_RETURN(-1); - } if (thd->lex->requires_prelocking() && thd->lex->sql_command != SQLCOM_LOCK_TABLES) @@ -4880,10 +4865,6 @@ int lock_tables(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables, uint count, We just have done implicit LOCK TABLES, and now we have to emulate first open_and_lock_tables() after it. - */ - thd->in_lock_tables= 0; - - /* When open_and_lock_tables() is called for a single table out of a table list, the 'next_global' chain is temporarily broken. We may not find 'first_not_own' before the end of the "list". @@ -4906,7 +4887,6 @@ int lock_tables(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables, uint count, */ mysql_unlock_tables(thd, thd->lock); thd->lock= 0; - thd->options&= ~(OPTION_TABLE_LOCK); DBUG_RETURN(-1); } } |