diff options
author | Galina Shalygina <galina.shalygina@mariadb.com> | 2018-05-15 23:45:59 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Galina Shalygina <galina.shalygina@mariadb.com> | 2018-05-15 23:45:59 +0200 |
commit | d3ff133390231d8224843995af6b11f6a381803e (patch) | |
tree | 9ccb641a5fdb346b017a46947ad26d9cc847707e /mysql-test/main/derived.result | |
parent | 569e3ad1ead6469fa9019a399dcef8d4f2fb71b4 (diff) | |
download | mariadb-git-d3ff133390231d8224843995af6b11f6a381803e.tar.gz |
MDEV-12387 Push conditions into materialized subqueries
The logic and the implementation scheme are similar with the
MDEV-9197 Pushdown conditions into non-mergeable views/derived tables
How the push down is made on the example:
select * from t1
where a>3 and b>10 and
(a,b) in (select x,max(y) from t2 group by x);
-->
select * from t1
where a>3 and b>10 and
(a,b) in (select x,max(y)
from t2
where x>3
group by x
having max(y)>10);
The implementation scheme:
1. Search for the condition cond that depends only on the fields
from the left part of the IN subquery (left_part)
2. Find fields F_group in the select of the right part of the
IN subquery (right_part) that are used in the GROUP BY
3. Extract from the cond condition cond_where that depends only on the
fields from the left_part that stay at the same places in the left_part
(have the same indexes) as the F_group fields in the projection of the
right_part
4. Transform cond_where so it can be pushed into the WHERE clause of the
right_part and delete cond_where from the cond
5. Transform cond so it can be pushed into the HAVING clause of the right_part
The optimization is made in the
Item_in_subselect::pushdown_cond_for_in_subquery() and is controlled by the
variable condition_pushdown_for_subquery.
New test file in_subq_cond_pushdown.test is created.
There are also some changes made for setup_jtbm_semi_joins().
Now it is decomposed into the 2 procedures: setup_degenerate_jtbm_semi_joins()
that is called before optimize_cond() for cond and setup_jtbm_semi_joins()
that is called after optimize_cond().
New setup_jtbm_semi_joins() is made in the way so that the result of its work is
the same as if it was called before optimize_cond().
The code that is common for pushdown into materialized derived and into materialized
IN subqueries is factored out into pushdown_cond_for_derived(),
Item_in_subselect::pushdown_cond_for_in_subquery() and
st_select_lex::pushdown_cond_into_where_clause().
Diffstat (limited to 'mysql-test/main/derived.result')
-rw-r--r-- | mysql-test/main/derived.result | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mysql-test/main/derived.result b/mysql-test/main/derived.result index ebbc08aa958..a1dd1a77d3b 100644 --- a/mysql-test/main/derived.result +++ b/mysql-test/main/derived.result @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows filtered Extra 2 DERIVED t1 system NULL NULL NULL NULL 1 100.00 Warnings: Note 1276 Field or reference 'sq.f2' of SELECT #3 was resolved in SELECT #1 -Note 1003 /* select#1 */ select 6 AS `f1` from <materialize> (/* select#4 */ select `test`.`t2`.`f3` from `test`.`t2` having `test`.`t2`.`f3` >= 8) semi join (`test`.`t2`) where `test`.`t2`.`f3` = 6 and `<subquery4>`.`f3` = 9 +Note 1003 /* select#1 */ select 6 AS `f1` from <materialize> (/* select#4 */ select `test`.`t2`.`f3` from `test`.`t2` having `test`.`t2`.`f3` >= 8) semi join (`test`.`t2`) where `<subquery4>`.`f3` = 9 and `test`.`t2`.`f3` = 6 DROP TABLE t2,t1; # # MDEV-9462: Out of memory using explain on 2 empty tables |