diff options
author | Jorgen Loland <jorgen.loland@oracle.com> | 2010-12-16 12:25:02 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jorgen Loland <jorgen.loland@oracle.com> | 2010-12-16 12:25:02 +0100 |
commit | 47b774b21c7f2fa600bae2b7193805a25d286b54 (patch) | |
tree | cc86f2f7e5035b9e03483455840ea4e93b91796c /mysql-test/r/join_outer_innodb.result | |
parent | 8b1571d80341770818404c9cc9ed4b362ffe5710 (diff) | |
download | mariadb-git-47b774b21c7f2fa600bae2b7193805a25d286b54.tar.gz |
BUG#58456 - Assertion 0 in QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT::need_sorted_output
in opt_range.h
In this bug, there are two alternative access plans:
* Index merge range access
* Const ref access
best_access_path() decided that the ref access was preferrable,
but make_join_select() still decided to point
SQL_SELECT::quick to the index merge because the table had
type==JT_CONST which was not handled.
At the same time the table's ref.key still referred to the
index the ref access would use indicating that ref access
should be used. In this state, different parts of the
optimizer code have different perceptions of which access path
is in use (ref or range).
test_if_skip_sort_order() was called to check if the ref access
needed ordering, but test_if_skip_sort_order() got confused and
requested the index merge to return records in sorted order.
Index merge cannot do this, and fired an ASSERT.
The fix is to take join_tab->type==JT_CONST into concideration
when make_join_select() decides whether or not to use the
range access method.
mysql-test/r/join_outer_innodb.result:
Add test for BUG#58456
mysql-test/t/join_outer_innodb.test:
Add test for BUG#58456
Diffstat (limited to 'mysql-test/r/join_outer_innodb.result')
-rw-r--r-- | mysql-test/r/join_outer_innodb.result | 35 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mysql-test/r/join_outer_innodb.result b/mysql-test/r/join_outer_innodb.result index e8a2d6f668b..7f6d4fb8553 100644 --- a/mysql-test/r/join_outer_innodb.result +++ b/mysql-test/r/join_outer_innodb.result @@ -17,3 +17,38 @@ id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra 1 SIMPLE t2 index NULL fkey 5 NULL 5 Using index 1 SIMPLE t1 eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 test.t2.fkey 1 Using where DROP TABLE t1,t2; +# +# BUG#58456: Assertion 0 in QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT::need_sorted_output +# in opt_range.h +# +CREATE TABLE t1 ( +col_int INT, +col_int_key INT, +pk INT NOT NULL, +PRIMARY KEY (pk), +KEY col_int_key (col_int_key) +) ENGINE=InnoDB; +INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL,1,1), (6,2,2), (5,3,3), (NULL,4,4); +INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,NULL,6), (8,5,7), (NULL,8,8), (8,NULL,5); +CREATE TABLE t2 ( +pk INT PRIMARY KEY +) ENGINE=InnoDB; + +EXPLAIN SELECT t1.pk +FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t1 ON t2.pk = t1.col_int +WHERE t1.col_int_key BETWEEN 5 AND 6 +AND t1.pk IS NULL OR t1.pk IN (5) +ORDER BY pk; +id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra +1 SIMPLE t1 const PRIMARY,col_int_key PRIMARY 4 const 2 Using where +1 SIMPLE t2 eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 test.t1.col_int 1 Using index + +SELECT t1.pk +FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t1 ON t2.pk = t1.col_int +WHERE t1.col_int_key BETWEEN 5 AND 6 +AND t1.pk IS NULL OR t1.pk IN (5) +ORDER BY pk; +pk + +DROP TABLE t1,t2; +# End BUG#58456 |