BUG#49129: Wrong result with IN-subquery with join_cache_level=6 and firstmatch=off

- The problem was that DuplicateWeedout strategy setup code wasn't aware of the 
  fact that join buffering will be used and applied optimization that doesn't work
  together with join buffering. Fixed by making DuplicateWeedout setup code to have 
  a pessimistic check about whether there is a chance that join buffering will be 
  used.
- Make JOIN_CACHE_BKA::init() correctly process Copy_field elements that denote saving
  current rowids in the join buffer.

mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2.result:
  Update test results
mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2_jcl6.result:
  Update test results
mysql-test/r/subselect_sj_jcl6.result:
  Testcase
mysql-test/t/subselect_sj2.test:
  Update test results
mysql-test/t/subselect_sj_jcl6.test:
  Testcase
sql/opt_subselect.cc:
  - The problem was that DuplicateWeedout strategy setup code wasn't aware of the 
    fact that join buffering will be used and applied optimization that doesn't work
    together with join buffering. Fixed by making DuplicateWeedout setup code to have 
    a pessimistic check about whether there is a chance that join buffering will be 
    used.
sql/sql_join_cache.cc:
  Make JOIN_CACHE_BKA::init() correctly process Copy_field elements that denote saving current rowids in the join buffer.
sql/sql_select.cc:
  Added a question note

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2_jcl6.result b/mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2_jcl6.result
index 866dcb535e4..15b0bdc24a6 100644
--- a/mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2_jcl6.result
+++ b/mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2_jcl6.result
@@ -268,8 +268,8 @@ explain select *
 from t0 where a in
 (select t2.a+t3.a from t1 left join (t2 join t3) on t2.a=t1.a and t3.a=t1.a);
 id	select_type	table	type	possible_keys	key	key_len	ref	rows	Extra
-1	PRIMARY	t0	ALL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	10	
-1	PRIMARY	t1	index	NULL	a	5	NULL	10	Using index; Start temporary; Using join buffer
+1	PRIMARY	t0	ALL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	10	Start temporary
+1	PRIMARY	t1	index	NULL	a	5	NULL	10	Using index; Using join buffer
 1	PRIMARY	t2	ref	a	a	5	test.t1.a	1	Using index
 1	PRIMARY	t3	ref	a	a	5	test.t1.a	1	Using where; Using index; End temporary
 drop table t0, t1,t2,t3;
@@ -421,20 +421,23 @@ explain extended select * from t0
 where t0.a in ( select t1.a from t1,t2 where t2.a=t0.a and
 t1.b=t2.b);
 id	select_type	table	type	possible_keys	key	key_len	ref	rows	filtered	Extra
-1	PRIMARY	t0	ALL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	5	100.00	
-1	PRIMARY	t1	ref	a	a	5	test.t0.a	1	100.00	Start temporary; Using join buffer
+1	PRIMARY	t0	ALL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	5	100.00	Start temporary
+1	PRIMARY	t1	ref	a	a	5	test.t0.a	1	100.00	Using join buffer
 1	PRIMARY	t2	eq_ref	PRIMARY	PRIMARY	4	test.t0.a	1	100.00	Using where; End temporary; Using join buffer
 Warnings:
 Note	1276	Field or reference 'test.t0.a' of SELECT #2 was resolved in SELECT #1
 Note	1003	select `test`.`t0`.`a` AS `a` from `test`.`t2` semi join (`test`.`t1`) join `test`.`t0` where ((`test`.`t2`.`b` = `test`.`t1`.`b`) and (`test`.`t1`.`a` = `test`.`t0`.`a`) and (`test`.`t2`.`a` = `test`.`t0`.`a`))
 update t1 set a=3, b=11 where a=4;
 update t2 set b=11 where a=3;
-
+# Not anymore:
 # The following query gives wrong result due to Bug#49129
 select * from t0 where t0.a in 
 (select t1.a from t1, t2 where t2.a=t0.a and t1.b=t2.b);
 a
 0
+1
+2
+3
 drop table t0, t1, t2;
 CREATE TABLE t1 (
 id int(11) NOT NULL,