diff options
author | Vladislav Vaintroub <vvaintroub@mysql.com> | 2010-10-04 13:03:11 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Vladislav Vaintroub <vvaintroub@mysql.com> | 2010-10-04 13:03:11 +0200 |
commit | 367bfa41066bfe88b720f530e938e2c4cbf79205 (patch) | |
tree | 54feedb66cda23603b48232147274cefc03564cf /mysys/thr_rwlock.c | |
parent | 34388f53153b309ad4cb925e392c13dfb1bb62dc (diff) | |
download | mariadb-git-367bfa41066bfe88b720f530e938e2c4cbf79205.tar.gz |
A follow-up to the patch for bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock
detector". This patch addresses performance regression in OLTP_RO/MyISAM
test on Windows introduced by the fix for bug #56405. Thus it makes
original patch acceptable as a solution for bug #56585 "Slowdown of
readonly sysbench benchmarks (e.g point_select) on Windows 5.5".
With this patch, MySQL will use native Windows condition variables and
reader-writer locks if they are supported by the OS.
This speeds up MyISAM and the effect comes mostly from using native
rwlocks. Native conditions improve scalability with higher number of
concurrent users in other situations, e.g for prlocks.
Benchmark numbers for this patch as measured on Win2008R2 quad
core machine are attached to the bug report.
( direct link http://bugs.mysql.com/file.php?id=15883 )
Note that currently we require at least Windows7/WS2008R2 for
reader-writer locks, even though native rwlock is available also on Vista.
Reason is that "trylock" APIs are missing on Vista, and trylock is used in
the server (in a single place in query cache).
While this patch could have been written differently, to enable the native
rwlock optimization also on Vista/WS2008 (e.g using native locks everywhere
but portable implementation in query cache), this would come at the
expense of the code clarity, as it would introduce a new "try-able" rwlock
type, to handle Vista case.
Another way to improve performance for the special case
(OLTP_RO/MYISAM/Vista) would be to eliminate "trylock" usage from server,
but this is outside of the scope here.
Native conditions variables are used beginning with Vista though the effect
of using condition variables alone is not measurable in this benchmark.
But when used together with native rwlocks on Win7, native conditions improve
performance in high-concurrency OLTP_RO/MyISAM (128 and more sysbench
users).
Diffstat (limited to 'mysys/thr_rwlock.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mysys/thr_rwlock.c | 160 |
1 files changed, 160 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mysys/thr_rwlock.c b/mysys/thr_rwlock.c index 218cfb251c8..13651221d37 100644 --- a/mysys/thr_rwlock.c +++ b/mysys/thr_rwlock.c @@ -20,6 +20,119 @@ #if defined(NEED_MY_RW_LOCK) #include <errno.h> +#ifdef _WIN32 + +static BOOL have_srwlock= FALSE; +/* Prototypes and function pointers for windows functions */ +typedef VOID (WINAPI* srw_func) (PSRWLOCK SRWLock); +typedef BOOL (WINAPI* srw_bool_func) (PSRWLOCK SRWLock); + +static srw_func my_InitializeSRWLock; +static srw_func my_AcquireSRWLockExclusive; +static srw_func my_ReleaseSRWLockExclusive; +static srw_func my_AcquireSRWLockShared; +static srw_func my_ReleaseSRWLockShared; + +static srw_bool_func my_TryAcquireSRWLockExclusive; +static srw_bool_func my_TryAcquireSRWLockShared; + +/** + Check for presence of Windows slim reader writer lock function. + Load function pointers. +*/ + +static void check_srwlock_availability(void) +{ + HMODULE module= GetModuleHandle("kernel32"); + + my_InitializeSRWLock= (srw_func) GetProcAddress(module, + "InitializeSRWLock"); + my_AcquireSRWLockExclusive= (srw_func) GetProcAddress(module, + "AcquireSRWLockExclusive"); + my_AcquireSRWLockShared= (srw_func) GetProcAddress(module, + "AcquireSRWLockShared"); + my_ReleaseSRWLockExclusive= (srw_func) GetProcAddress(module, + "ReleaseSRWLockExclusive"); + my_ReleaseSRWLockShared= (srw_func) GetProcAddress(module, + "ReleaseSRWLockShared"); + my_TryAcquireSRWLockExclusive= (srw_bool_func) GetProcAddress(module, + "TryAcquireSRWLockExclusive"); + my_TryAcquireSRWLockShared= (srw_bool_func) GetProcAddress(module, + "TryAcquireSRWLockShared"); + + /* + We currently require TryAcquireSRWLockExclusive. This API is missing on + Vista, this means SRWLock are only used starting with Win7. + + If "trylock" usage for rwlocks is eliminated from server codebase (it is used + in a single place currently, in query cache), then SRWLock can be enabled on + Vista too. In this case condition below needs to be changed to e.g check + for my_InitializeSRWLock. + */ + + if (my_TryAcquireSRWLockExclusive) + have_srwlock= TRUE; + +} + + +static int srw_init(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) +{ + my_InitializeSRWLock(&rwp->srwlock); + rwp->have_exclusive_srwlock = FALSE; + return 0; +} + + +static int srw_rdlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) +{ + my_AcquireSRWLockShared(&rwp->srwlock); + return 0; +} + + +static int srw_tryrdlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) +{ + + if (!my_TryAcquireSRWLockShared(&rwp->srwlock)) + return EBUSY; + return 0; +} + + +static int srw_wrlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) +{ + my_AcquireSRWLockExclusive(&rwp->srwlock); + rwp->have_exclusive_srwlock= TRUE; + return 0; +} + + +static int srw_trywrlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) +{ + if (!my_TryAcquireSRWLockExclusive(&rwp->srwlock)) + return EBUSY; + rwp->have_exclusive_srwlock= TRUE; + return 0; +} + + +static int srw_unlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) +{ + if (rwp->have_exclusive_srwlock) + { + rwp->have_exclusive_srwlock= FALSE; + my_ReleaseSRWLockExclusive(&rwp->srwlock); + } + else + { + my_ReleaseSRWLockShared(&rwp->srwlock); + } + return 0; +} + +#endif /*_WIN32 */ + /* Source base from Sun Microsystems SPILT, simplified for MySQL use -- Joshua Chamas @@ -63,6 +176,22 @@ int my_rw_init(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) { pthread_condattr_t cond_attr; +#ifdef _WIN32 + /* + Once initialization is used here rather than in my_init(), in order to + - avoid my_init() pitfalls- (undefined order in which initialization should + run) + - be potentially useful C++ (static constructors) + - just to simplify the API. + Also, the overhead is of my_pthread_once is very small. + */ + static my_pthread_once_t once_control= MY_PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT; + my_pthread_once(&once_control, check_srwlock_availability); + + if (have_srwlock) + return srw_init(rwp); +#endif + pthread_mutex_init( &rwp->lock, MY_MUTEX_INIT_FAST); pthread_condattr_init( &cond_attr ); pthread_cond_init( &rwp->readers, &cond_attr ); @@ -81,6 +210,10 @@ int my_rw_init(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) int my_rw_destroy(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) { +#ifdef _WIN32 + if (have_srwlock) + return 0; /* no destroy function */ +#endif DBUG_ASSERT(rwp->state == 0); pthread_mutex_destroy( &rwp->lock ); pthread_cond_destroy( &rwp->readers ); @@ -91,6 +224,11 @@ int my_rw_destroy(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) int my_rw_rdlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) { +#ifdef _WIN32 + if (have_srwlock) + return srw_rdlock(rwp); +#endif + pthread_mutex_lock(&rwp->lock); /* active or queued writers */ @@ -105,6 +243,12 @@ int my_rw_rdlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) int my_rw_tryrdlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) { int res; + +#ifdef _WIN32 + if (have_srwlock) + return srw_tryrdlock(rwp); +#endif + pthread_mutex_lock(&rwp->lock); if ((rwp->state < 0 ) || rwp->waiters) res= EBUSY; /* Can't get lock */ @@ -120,6 +264,11 @@ int my_rw_tryrdlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) int my_rw_wrlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) { +#ifdef _WIN32 + if (have_srwlock) + return srw_wrlock(rwp); +#endif + pthread_mutex_lock(&rwp->lock); rwp->waiters++; /* another writer queued */ @@ -140,6 +289,12 @@ int my_rw_wrlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) int my_rw_trywrlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) { int res; + +#ifdef _WIN32 + if (have_srwlock) + return srw_trywrlock(rwp); +#endif + pthread_mutex_lock(&rwp->lock); if (rwp->state) res= EBUSY; /* Can't get lock */ @@ -158,6 +313,11 @@ int my_rw_trywrlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) int my_rw_unlock(my_rw_lock_t *rwp) { +#ifdef _WIN32 + if (have_srwlock) + return srw_unlock(rwp); +#endif + DBUG_PRINT("rw_unlock", ("state: %d waiters: %d", rwp->state, rwp->waiters)); pthread_mutex_lock(&rwp->lock); |