summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sql/sql_select.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorunknown <igor@rurik.mysql.com>2004-10-09 10:34:13 -0700
committerunknown <igor@rurik.mysql.com>2004-10-09 10:34:13 -0700
commit881534fb80cc7a017d180734a21a10b3e46aecba (patch)
tree84324c7af32f54d423310e3a2ee3255f7f43749b /sql/sql_select.cc
parent79f1eeb87ff8047d1d09578f41c604bf5e31f29b (diff)
parent75fec5bdc3e9e5f0a4018c7dbf6371f0b4c5d14f (diff)
downloadmariadb-git-881534fb80cc7a017d180734a21a10b3e46aecba.tar.gz
Merge for Item_equal.
BitKeeper/etc/ignore: auto-union mysql-test/r/bdb.result: Auto merged mysql-test/r/func_group.result: Auto merged mysql-test/r/innodb.result: Auto merged mysql-test/r/heap_btree.result: Auto merged mysql-test/r/select.result: Auto merged mysql-test/r/user_var.result: Auto merged mysql-test/t/range.test: Auto merged sql/item_func.cc: Auto merged sql/item_func.h: Auto merged sql/item_row.cc: Auto merged sql/item_strfunc.h: Auto merged sql/opt_sum.cc: Auto merged sql/sql_list.h: Auto merged mysql-test/r/func_test.result: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts mysql-test/r/index_merge.result: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts mysql-test/r/join_outer.result: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts mysql-test/r/range.result: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts mysql-test/r/subselect.result: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts sql/item.cc: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts sql/item.h: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts sql/item_cmpfunc.cc: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts sql/item_cmpfunc.h: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts sql/opt_range.cc: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts sql/sql_select.cc: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts sql/sql_select.h: Post-automerge resolution of conflicts
Diffstat (limited to 'sql/sql_select.cc')
-rw-r--r--sql/sql_select.cc892
1 files changed, 864 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/sql/sql_select.cc b/sql/sql_select.cc
index e104ac1ca38..b3355f6c57c 100644
--- a/sql/sql_select.cc
+++ b/sql/sql_select.cc
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static bool make_join_statistics(JOIN *join,TABLE_LIST *tables,COND *conds,
static bool update_ref_and_keys(THD *thd, DYNAMIC_ARRAY *keyuse,
JOIN_TAB *join_tab,
uint tables, COND *conds,
+ COND_EQUAL *cond_equal,
table_map table_map, SELECT_LEX *select_lex);
static int sort_keyuse(KEYUSE *a,KEYUSE *b);
static void set_position(JOIN *join,uint index,JOIN_TAB *table,KEYUSE *key);
@@ -90,6 +91,11 @@ static int return_zero_rows(JOIN *join, select_result *res,TABLE_LIST *tables,
uint select_options, const char *info,
Item *having, Procedure *proc,
SELECT_LEX_UNIT *unit);
+static COND *build_all_equal_items(COND *cond,
+ COND_EQUAL *inherited);
+static COND* substitute_for_best_equal_field(COND *cond,
+ COND_EQUAL *cond_equal,
+ void *table_join_idx);
static COND *simplify_joins(JOIN *join, List<TABLE_LIST> *join_list,
COND *conds, bool top);
static COND *optimize_cond(JOIN *join, COND *conds,
@@ -525,6 +531,52 @@ JOIN::optimize()
}
#endif
+ /* Eliminate NOT operators */
+ conds= eliminate_not_funcs(conds);
+ DBUG_EXECUTE("where", print_where(conds, "after negation elimination"););
+ {
+ TABLE_LIST *tables;
+ for (tables= tables_list; tables; tables= tables->next)
+ {
+ if (tables->on_expr)
+ tables->on_expr= eliminate_not_funcs(tables->on_expr);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ Build all multiple equality predicates and eliminate equality
+ predicates that can be inferred from these multiple equalities.
+ For each reference of a field included into a multiple equality
+ that occurs in a function set a pointer to the multiple equality
+ predicate. Substitute a constant instead of this field if the
+ multiple equality contains a constant.
+ */
+ if (conds)
+ {
+ conds= build_all_equal_items(conds, NULL);
+ conds->update_used_tables();
+ if (conds->type() == Item::COND_ITEM &&
+ ((Item_cond*) conds)->functype() == Item_func::COND_AND_FUNC)
+ cond_equal= &((Item_cond_and*) conds)->cond_equal;
+ else if (conds->type() == Item::FUNC_ITEM &&
+ ((Item_cond*) conds)->functype() == Item_func::MULT_EQUAL_FUNC)
+ {
+ cond_equal= new COND_EQUAL;
+ cond_equal->current_level.push_back((Item_equal *) conds);
+ }
+ }
+ {
+ TABLE_LIST *tables;
+ for (tables= tables_list; tables; tables= tables->next)
+ {
+ if (tables->on_expr)
+ {
+ tables->on_expr= build_all_equal_items(tables->on_expr, cond_equal);
+ tables->on_expr->update_used_tables();
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
conds= optimize_cond(this, conds,&cond_value);
if (thd->net.report_error)
{
@@ -617,7 +669,31 @@ JOIN::optimize()
if (const_tables && !thd->locked_tables &&
!(select_options & SELECT_NO_UNLOCK))
mysql_unlock_some_tables(thd, table, const_tables);
-
+ /*
+ Among the equal fields belonging to the same multiple equality
+ choose the one that is to be retrieved first and substitute
+ all references to these in where condition for a reference for
+ the selected field.
+ */
+ if (conds)
+ {
+ conds= substitute_for_best_equal_field(conds, cond_equal, map2table);
+ conds->update_used_tables();
+ }
+ {
+ TABLE_LIST *tables;
+ for (tables= tables_list; tables; tables= tables->next)
+ {
+ if (tables->on_expr)
+ {
+ tables->on_expr= substitute_for_best_equal_field(tables->on_expr,
+ cond_equal,
+ map2table);
+ tables->on_expr->update_used_tables();
+ map2table[tables->table->tablenr]->on_expr= tables->on_expr;
+ }
+ }
+ }
if (!conds && outer_join)
{
/* Handle the case where we have an OUTER JOIN without a WHERE */
@@ -2150,7 +2226,8 @@ make_join_statistics(JOIN *join,TABLE_LIST *tables,COND *conds,
if (conds || outer_join)
if (update_ref_and_keys(join->thd, keyuse_array, stat, join->tables,
- conds, ~outer_join, join->select_lex))
+ conds, join->cond_equal,
+ ~outer_join, join->select_lex))
DBUG_RETURN(1);
/* Read tables with 0 or 1 rows (system tables) */
@@ -2482,6 +2559,7 @@ merge_key_fields(KEY_FIELD *start,KEY_FIELD *new_fields,KEY_FIELD *end,
add_key_field()
key_fields Pointer to add key, if usable
and_level And level, to be stored in KEY_FIELD
+ cond Condition predicate
field Field used in comparision
eq_func True if we used =, <=> or IS NULL
value Value used for comparison with field
@@ -2497,8 +2575,8 @@ merge_key_fields(KEY_FIELD *start,KEY_FIELD *new_fields,KEY_FIELD *end,
*/
static void
-add_key_field(KEY_FIELD **key_fields,uint and_level, COND *cond,
- Field *field,bool eq_func,Item **value, uint num_values,
+add_key_field(KEY_FIELD **key_fields, uint and_level, COND *cond,
+ Field *field, bool eq_func, Item **value, uint num_values,
table_map usable_tables)
{
uint exists_optimize= 0;
@@ -2603,6 +2681,57 @@ add_key_field(KEY_FIELD **key_fields,uint and_level, COND *cond,
}
+/*
+ Add possible keys to array of possible keys originated from a simple predicate
+
+ SYNPOSIS
+ add_key_equal_fields()
+ key_fields Pointer to add key, if usable
+ and_level And level, to be stored in KEY_FIELD
+ cond Condition predicate
+ field Field used in comparision
+ eq_func True if we used =, <=> or IS NULL
+ value Value used for comparison with field
+ Is NULL for BETWEEN and IN
+ usable_tables Tables which can be used for key optimization
+
+ NOTES
+ If field items f1 and f2 belong to the same multiple equality and
+ a key is added for f1, the the same key is added for f2.
+
+ RETURN
+ *key_fields is incremented if we stored a key in the array
+*/
+
+static void
+add_key_equal_fields(KEY_FIELD **key_fields, uint and_level,
+ COND *cond, Item_field *field_item,
+ bool eq_func, Item **val,
+ uint num_values, table_map usable_tables)
+{
+ Field *field= field_item->field;
+ add_key_field(key_fields, and_level, cond, field,
+ eq_func, val, num_values, usable_tables);
+ Item_equal *item_equal= field_item->item_equal;
+ if (item_equal)
+ {
+ /*
+ Add to the set of possible key values every substitution of
+ the field for an equal field included into item_equal
+ */
+ Item_equal_iterator it(*item_equal);
+ Item_field *item;
+ while ((item= it++))
+ {
+ if (!field->eq(item->field))
+ {
+ add_key_field(key_fields, and_level, cond, item->field,
+ eq_func, val, num_values, usable_tables);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static void
add_key_fields(JOIN_TAB *stat,KEY_FIELD **key_fields,uint *and_level,
COND *cond, table_map usable_tables)
@@ -2663,21 +2792,19 @@ add_key_fields(JOIN_TAB *stat,KEY_FIELD **key_fields,uint *and_level,
if (cond_func->arguments()[0]->real_item()->type() == Item::FIELD_ITEM &&
!(cond_func->arguments()[0]->used_tables() & OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT))
{
- add_key_field(key_fields,*and_level,cond_func,
- ((Item_field*) (cond_func->arguments()[0])->real_item())
- ->field,
- equal_func,
- cond_func->arguments()+1, 1, usable_tables);
+ add_key_equal_fields(key_fields, *and_level, cond_func,
+ (Item_field*) (cond_func->arguments()[0])->real_item(),
+ equal_func,
+ cond_func->arguments()+1, 1, usable_tables);
}
if (cond_func->arguments()[1]->real_item()->type() == Item::FIELD_ITEM &&
cond_func->functype() != Item_func::LIKE_FUNC &&
!(cond_func->arguments()[1]->used_tables() & OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT))
{
- add_key_field(key_fields,*and_level,cond_func,
- ((Item_field*) (cond_func->arguments()[1])->real_item())
- ->field,
- equal_func,
- cond_func->arguments(),1,usable_tables);
+ add_key_equal_fields(key_fields, *and_level, cond_func,
+ (Item_field*) (cond_func->arguments()[1])->real_item(),
+ equal_func,
+ cond_func->arguments(),1,usable_tables);
}
break;
}
@@ -2689,15 +2816,55 @@ add_key_fields(JOIN_TAB *stat,KEY_FIELD **key_fields,uint *and_level,
Item *tmp=new Item_null;
if (unlikely(!tmp)) // Should never be true
return;
- add_key_field(key_fields,*and_level,cond_func,
- ((Item_field*) (cond_func->arguments()[0])->real_item())
- ->field,
+ add_key_equal_fields(key_fields, *and_level, cond_func,
+ (Item_field*) (cond_func->arguments()[0])->real_item(),
cond_func->functype() == Item_func::ISNULL_FUNC,
&tmp, 1, usable_tables);
}
break;
+ case Item_func::OPTIMIZE_EQUAL:
+ Item_equal *item_equal= (Item_equal *) cond;
+ Item *const_item= item_equal->get_const();
+ Item_equal_iterator it(*item_equal);
+ Item_field *item;
+ if (const_item)
+ {
+ /*
+ For each field field1 from item_equal consider the equality
+ field1=const_item as a condition allowing an index access of the table
+ with field1 by the keys value of field1.
+ */
+ while ((item= it++))
+ {
+ add_key_field(key_fields, *and_level, cond, item->field,
+ TRUE, &const_item, 1, usable_tables);
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /*
+ Consider all pairs of different fields included into item_equal.
+ For each of them (field1, field1) consider the equality
+ field1=field2 as a condition allowing an index access of the table
+ with field1 by the keys value of field2.
+ */
+ Item_equal_iterator fi(*item_equal);
+ while ((item= fi++))
+ {
+ Field *field= item->field;
+ while ((item= it++))
+ {
+ if (!field->eq(item->field))
+ {
+ add_key_field(key_fields, *and_level, cond, field,
+ TRUE, (Item **) &item, 1, usable_tables);
+ }
+ }
+ it.rewind();
+ }
+ }
+ break;
}
- return;
}
/*
@@ -2840,15 +3007,19 @@ sort_keyuse(KEYUSE *a,KEYUSE *b)
static bool
update_ref_and_keys(THD *thd, DYNAMIC_ARRAY *keyuse,JOIN_TAB *join_tab,
- uint tables, COND *cond, table_map normal_tables,
- SELECT_LEX *select_lex)
+ uint tables, COND *cond, COND_EQUAL *cond_equal,
+ table_map normal_tables, SELECT_LEX *select_lex)
{
uint and_level,i,found_eq_constant;
KEY_FIELD *key_fields, *end, *field;
+ uint m= 1;
+
+ if (cond_equal && cond_equal->max_members)
+ m= cond_equal->max_members;
if (!(key_fields=(KEY_FIELD*)
thd->alloc(sizeof(key_fields[0])*
- (thd->lex->current_select->cond_count+1)*2)))
+ (thd->lex->current_select->cond_count+1)*2*m)))
return TRUE; /* purecov: inspected */
and_level= 0;
field= end= key_fields;
@@ -4953,7 +5124,7 @@ make_join_select(JOIN *join,SQL_SELECT *select,COND *cond)
}
COND *tmp=make_cond_for_table(cond,used_tables,current_map);
- if (!tmp && tab->quick)
+ if (!tmp && tab->quick && tab->type == JT_ALL)
{ // Outer join
if (tab->type != JT_ALL)
{
@@ -5757,6 +5928,668 @@ template class List<Item_func_match>;
template class List_iterator<Item_func_match>;
#endif
+
+/*
+ Find the multiple equality predicate containing a field
+
+ SYNOPSIS
+ find_item_equal()
+ cond_equal multiple equalities to search in
+ field field to look for
+ inherited_fl :out set up to TRUE iff multiple equality is found
+ on upper levels (not on current level of cond_equal)
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ The function retrieves the multiple equalities accessed through
+ the con_equal structure from current level and up looking for
+ an equality containing field. It stops retrieval as soon as the equality
+ is found and set up inherited_fl to TRUE if it's found on upper levels.
+
+ RETURN
+ Item_equal for the found multiple equality predicate if a success;
+ NULL - otherwise.
+*/
+
+Item_equal *find_item_equal(COND_EQUAL *cond_equal, Field *field,
+ bool *inherited_fl)
+{
+ Item_equal *item= 0;
+ bool in_upper_level= FALSE;
+ while (cond_equal)
+ {
+ List_iterator_fast<Item_equal> li(cond_equal->current_level);
+ while ((item= li++))
+ {
+ if (item->contains(field))
+ goto finish;
+ }
+ in_upper_level= TRUE;
+ cond_equal= cond_equal->upper_levels;
+ }
+ in_upper_level= FALSE;
+finish:
+ *inherited_fl= in_upper_level;
+ return item;
+}
+
+
+/*
+ Check whether an item is a simple equality predicate and if so
+ create/find a multiple equality for this predicate
+
+ SYNOPSIS
+ check_equality()
+ item item to check
+ cond_equal multiple equalities that must hold together with the predicate
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ This function first checks whether an item is a simple equality i.e.
+ the one that equates a field with another field or a constant
+ (item=constant_item or item=field_item).
+ If this is the case the function looks a for a multiple equality
+ in the lists referenced directly or indirectly by cond_equal inferring
+ the given simple equality. If it doesn't find any, it builds a multiple
+ equality that covers the predicate, i.e. the predicate can be inferred
+ from it.
+ The built multiple equality could be obtained in such a way:
+ create a binary multiple equality equivalent to the predicate, then
+ merge it, if possible, with one of old multiple equalities.
+ This guarantees that the set of multiple equalities covering equality
+ predicates will
+ be minimal.
+
+ EXAMPLE
+ For the where condition
+ WHERE a=b AND b=c AND
+ (b=2 OR f=e)
+ the check_equality will be called for the following equality
+ predicates a=b, b=c, b=2 and f=e.
+ For a=b it will be called with *cond_equal=(0,[]) and will transform
+ *cond_equal into (0,[Item_equal(a,b)]).
+ For b=c it will be called with *cond_equal=(0,[Item_equal(a,b)])
+ and will transform *cond_equal into CE=(0,[Item_equal(a,b,c)]).
+ For b=2 it will be called with *cond_equal=(ptr(CE),[])
+ and will transform *cond_equal into (ptr(CE,[Item_equal(2,a,b,c)]).
+ For f=e it will be called with *cond_equal=(ptr(CE), [])
+ and will transform *cond_equal into (ptr(CE,[Item_equal(f,e)]).
+
+ NOTES
+ Now only fields that have the same type defintions (verified by
+ the Field::eq_def method) are placed to the same multiple equalities.
+ Because of this some equality predicates are not eliminated and
+ can be used in the constant propagation procedure.
+ We could weeken the equlity test as soon as at least one of the
+ equal fields is to be equal to a constant. It would require a
+ more complicated implementation: we would have to store, in
+ general case, its own constant for each fields from the multiple
+ equality. But at the same time it would allow us to get rid
+ of constant propagation completely: it would be done by the call
+ to build_all_equal_items.
+
+ IMPLEMENTATION
+ The implementation does not follow exactly the above rules to
+ build a new multiple equality for the equality predicate.
+ If it processes the equality of the form field1=field2, it
+ looks for multiple equalities me1 containig field1 and me2 containing
+ field2. If only one of them is found the fuction expands it with
+ the lacking field. If multiple equalities for both fields are
+ found they are merged. If both searches fail a new multiple equality
+ containing just field1 and field2 is added to the existing
+ multiple equalities.
+ If the function processes the predicate of the form field1=const,
+ it looks for a multiple equality containing field1. If found, the
+ function checks the constant of the multiple equality. If the value
+ is unknown, it is setup to const. Otherwise the value is compared with
+ const and the evaluation of the equality predicate is performed.
+ When expanding/merging equality predicates from the upper levels
+ the function first copies them for the current level. It looks
+ acceptable, as this happens rarely. The implementation without
+ copying would be much more complicated.
+
+ RETURN
+ TRUE - if the predicate is a simple equality predicate
+ FALSE - otherwise
+*/
+
+static bool check_equality(Item *item, COND_EQUAL *cond_equal)
+{
+ if (item->type() == Item::FUNC_ITEM &&
+ ((Item_func*) item)->functype() == Item_func::EQ_FUNC)
+ {
+ Item *left_item= ((Item_func*) item)->arguments()[0];
+ Item *right_item= ((Item_func*) item)->arguments()[1];
+ if (left_item->type() == Item::FIELD_ITEM &&
+ right_item->type() == Item::FIELD_ITEM)
+ {
+ /* The predicate the form field1=field2 is processed */
+
+ Field *left_field= ((Item_field*) left_item)->field;
+ Field *right_field= ((Item_field*) right_item)->field;
+
+ if (!left_field->eq_def(right_field))
+ return FALSE;
+
+ if (left_field->eq(right_field)) /* f = f */
+ return TRUE;
+
+ /* Search for multiple equalities containing field1 and/or field2 */
+ bool left_copyfl, right_copyfl;
+ Item_equal *left_item_equal=
+ find_item_equal(cond_equal, left_field, &left_copyfl);
+ Item_equal *right_item_equal=
+ find_item_equal(cond_equal, right_field, &right_copyfl);
+
+ if (left_item_equal && left_item_equal == right_item_equal)
+ {
+ /*
+ The equality predicate is inference of one of the existing
+ multiple equalities, i.e the condition is already covered
+ by upper level equalities
+ */
+ return TRUE;
+ }
+
+ /* Copy the found multiple equalities at the current level if needed */
+ if (left_copyfl)
+ {
+ /* left_item_equal of an upper level contains left_item */
+ left_item_equal= new Item_equal(left_item_equal);
+ cond_equal->current_level.push_back(left_item_equal);
+ }
+ if (right_copyfl)
+ {
+ /* right_item_equal of an upper level contains right_item */
+ right_item_equal= new Item_equal(right_item_equal);
+ cond_equal->current_level.push_back(right_item_equal);
+ }
+
+ if (left_item_equal)
+ {
+ /* left item was found in the current or one of the upper levels */
+ if (! right_item_equal)
+ left_item_equal->add((Item_field *) right_item);
+ else
+ {
+ /* Merge two multiple equalities forming a new one */
+ left_item_equal->merge(right_item_equal);
+ /* Remove the merged multiple equality from the list */
+ List_iterator<Item_equal> li(cond_equal->current_level);
+ while ((li++) != right_item_equal);
+ li.remove();
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* left item was not found neither the current nor in upper levels */
+ if (right_item_equal)
+ right_item_equal->add((Item_field *) left_item);
+ else
+ {
+ /* None of the fields was found in multiple equalities */
+ Item_equal *item= new Item_equal((Item_field *) left_item,
+ (Item_field *) right_item);
+ cond_equal->current_level.push_back(item);
+ }
+ }
+ return TRUE;
+ }
+
+ {
+ /* The predicate of the form field=const/const=field is processed */
+ Item *const_item= 0;
+ Item_field *field_item= 0;
+ if (left_item->type() == Item::FIELD_ITEM &&
+ right_item->const_item())
+ {
+ field_item= (Item_field*) left_item;
+ const_item= right_item;
+ }
+ else if (right_item->type() == Item::FIELD_ITEM &&
+ left_item->const_item())
+ {
+ field_item= (Item_field*) right_item;
+ const_item= left_item;
+ }
+ if (const_item &&
+ field_item->result_type() == const_item->result_type())
+ {
+ bool copyfl;
+
+ if (field_item->result_type() == STRING_RESULT &&
+ ((Field_str *) field_item)->charset() !=
+ ((Item_cond *) item)->compare_collation())
+ return FALSE;
+
+ Item_equal *item_equal = find_item_equal(cond_equal,
+ field_item->field, &copyfl);
+ if (copyfl)
+ {
+ item_equal= new Item_equal(item_equal);
+ cond_equal->current_level.push_back(item_equal);
+ }
+ if (item_equal)
+ {
+ /*
+ The flag cond_false will be set to 1 after this, if item_equal
+ already contains a constant and its value is not equal to
+ the value of const_item.
+ */
+ item_equal->add(const_item);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ item_equal= new Item_equal(const_item, field_item);
+ cond_equal->current_level.push_back(item_equal);
+ }
+ return TRUE;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return FALSE;
+}
+
+/*
+ Replace all equality predicates in a condition by multiple equality items
+
+ SYNOPSIS
+ build_all_equal_items()
+ cond condition(expression) where to make replacement
+ inherited path to all inherited multiple equality items
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ At each 'and' level the function detects items for equality predicates
+ and replaced them by a set of multiple equality items of class Item_equal,
+ taking into account inherited equalities from upper levels.
+ If an equality predicate is used not in a conjunction it's just
+ replaced by a multiple equality predicate.
+ For each 'and' level the function set a pointer to the inherited
+ multiple equalities in the cond_equal field of the associated
+ object of the type Item_cond_and.
+ The function also traverses the cond tree and and for each field reference
+ sets a pointer to the multiple equality item containing the field, if there
+ is any. If this multiple equality equates fields to a constant the
+ function replace the field reference by the constant.
+ The function also determines the maximum number of members in
+ equality lists of each Item_cond_and object assigning it to
+ cond_equal->max_members of this object and updating accordingly
+ the upper levels COND_EQUAL structures.
+
+ NOTES
+ Multiple equality predicate =(f1,..fn) is equivalent to the conjuction of
+ f1=f2, .., fn-1=fn. It substitutes any inference from these
+ equality predicates that is equivalent to the conjunction.
+ Thus, =(a1,a2,a3) can substitute for ((a1=a3) AND (a2=a3) AND (a2=a1)) as
+ it is equivalent to ((a1=a2) AND (a2=a3)).
+ The function always makes a substitution of all equality predicates occured
+ in a conjuction for a minimal set of multiple equality predicates.
+ This set can be considered as a canonical representation of the
+ sub-conjunction of the equality predicates.
+ E.g. (t1.a=t2.b AND t2.b>5 AND t1.a=t3.c) is replaced by
+ (=(t1.a,t2.b,t3.c) AND t2.b>5), not by
+ (=(t1.a,t2.b) AND =(t1.a,t3.c) AND t2.b>5);
+ while (t1.a=t2.b AND t2.b>5 AND t3.c=t4.d) is replaced by
+ (=(t1.a,t2.b) AND =(t3.c=t4.d) AND t2.b>5),
+ but if additionally =(t4.d,t2.b) is inherited, it
+ will be replaced by (=(t1.a,t2.b,t3.c,t4.d) AND t2.b>5)
+
+ IMPLEMENTATION
+ The function performs the substitution in a recursive descent by
+ the condtion tree, passing to the next AND level a chain of multiple
+ equality predicates which have been built at the upper levels.
+ The Item_equal items built at the level are attached to other
+ non-equality conjucts as a sublist. The pointer to the inherited
+ multiple equalities is saved in the and condition object (Item_cond_and).
+ This chain allows us for any field reference occurence easyly to find a
+ multiple equality that must be held for this occurence.
+ For each AND level we do the following:
+ - scan it for all equality predicate (=) items
+ - join them into disjoint Item_equal() groups
+ - process the included OR conditions recursively to do the same for
+ lower AND levels.
+ We need to do things in this order as lower AND levels need to know about
+ all possible Item_equal objects in upper levels.
+
+ RETURN
+ pointer to the transformed condition
+*/
+
+static COND *build_all_equal_items(COND *cond,
+ COND_EQUAL *inherited)
+{
+ Item_equal *item_equal;
+ uint members;
+ COND_EQUAL cond_equal;
+ cond_equal.upper_levels= inherited;
+
+ if (cond->type() == Item::COND_ITEM)
+ {
+ bool and_level= ((Item_cond*) cond)->functype() ==
+ Item_func::COND_AND_FUNC;
+ List<Item> *args= ((Item_cond*) cond)->argument_list();
+
+ List_iterator<Item> li(*args);
+ Item *item;
+
+ if (and_level)
+ {
+ /*
+ Retrieve all conjucts of this level detecting the equality
+ that are subject to substitution by multiple equality items and
+ removing each such predicate from the conjunction after having
+ found/created a multiple equality whose inference the predicate is.
+ */
+ while ((item= li++))
+ {
+ if (check_equality(item, &cond_equal))
+ li.remove();
+ }
+
+ List_iterator_fast<Item_equal> it(cond_equal.current_level);
+ while ((item_equal= it++))
+ {
+ item_equal->fix_length_and_dec();
+ item_equal->update_used_tables();
+ members= item_equal->members();
+ if (cond_equal.max_members < members)
+ cond_equal.max_members= members;
+ }
+ members= cond_equal.max_members;
+ if (inherited && inherited->max_members < members)
+ {
+ do
+ {
+ inherited->max_members= members;
+ inherited= inherited->upper_levels;
+ }
+ while (inherited);
+ }
+
+ ((Item_cond_and*)cond)->cond_equal= cond_equal;
+ inherited= &(((Item_cond_and*)cond)->cond_equal);
+ }
+ /*
+ Make replacement of equality predicates for lower levels
+ of the condition expression.
+ */
+ li.rewind();
+ while((item= li++))
+ {
+ Item *new_item;
+ if ((new_item = build_all_equal_items(item, inherited))!= item)
+ {
+ /* This replacement happens only for standalone equalities */
+ li.replace(new_item);
+ }
+ }
+ if (and_level)
+ args->concat((List<Item> *)&cond_equal.current_level);
+ }
+ else if (cond->type() == Item::FUNC_ITEM)
+ {
+ /*
+ If an equality predicate forms the whole and level,
+ we call it standalone equality and it's processed here.
+ E.g. in the following where condition
+ WHERE a=5 AND (b=5 or a=c)
+ (b=5) and (a=c) are standalone equalities.
+ In general we can't leave alone standalone eqalities:
+ for WHERE a=b AND c=d AND (b=c OR d=5)
+ b=c is replaced by =(a,b,c,d).
+ */
+ if (check_equality(cond, &cond_equal) &&
+ (item_equal= cond_equal.current_level.pop()))
+ {
+ item_equal->fix_length_and_dec();
+ item_equal->update_used_tables();
+ return item_equal;
+ }
+ /*
+ For each field reference in cond, not from equalitym predicates,
+ set a pointer to the multiple equality if belongs to (if there is any)
+ */
+ cond= cond->transform(&Item::equal_fields_propagator,
+ (byte *) inherited);
+ cond->update_used_tables();
+ }
+ return cond;
+}
+
+/*
+ Compare field items by table order in the execution plan
+
+ SYNOPSIS
+ compare_fields_by_table_order()
+ field1 first field item to compare
+ field2 second field item to compare
+ table_join_idx index to tables determining table order
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ field1 considered as better than field2 if the table containing
+ field1 is accessed earlier than the table containing field2.
+ The function finds out what of two fields is better according
+ this criteria.
+
+ RETURN
+ 1, if field1 is better than field2
+ -1, if field2 is better than field1
+ 0, otherwise
+*/
+
+static int compare_fields_by_table_order(Item_field *field1,
+ Item_field *field2,
+ void *table_join_idx)
+{
+ int cmp= 0;
+ bool outer_ref= 0;
+ if (field2->used_tables() & OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT)
+ {
+ outer_ref= 1;
+ cmp= -1;
+ }
+ if (field2->used_tables() & OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT)
+ {
+ outer_ref= 1;
+ cmp++;
+ }
+ if (outer_ref)
+ return cmp;
+ JOIN_TAB **idx= (JOIN_TAB **) table_join_idx;
+ cmp= idx[field2->field->table->tablenr]-idx[field1->field->table->tablenr];
+ return cmp < 0 ? -1 : (cmp ? 1 : 0);
+}
+
+
+/*
+ Generate minimal set of simple equalities equivalent to a multiple equality
+
+ SYNOPSIS
+ eliminate_item_equal()
+ cond condition to add the generated equality to
+ upper_levels structure to access multiple equality of upper levels
+ item_equal multiple equality to generate simple equality from
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ The function retrieves the fields of the multiple equality item
+ item_equal and for each field f:
+ - if item_equal contains const it generates the equality f=const_item;
+ - otherwise, if f is not the first field, generates the equality
+ f=item_equal->get_first().
+ All generated equality are added to the cond conjunction.
+
+ NOTES
+ Before generating an equality function checks that it has not
+ been generated for multiple equalies of the upper levels.
+ E.g. for the following where condition
+ WHERE a=5 AND ((a=b AND b=c) OR c>4)
+ the upper level AND condition will contain =(5,a),
+ while the lower level AND condition will contain =(5,a,b,c).
+ When splitting =(5,a,b,c) into a separate equality predicates
+ we should omit 5=a, as we have it already in the upper level.
+ The following where condition gives us a more complicated case:
+ WHERE t1.a=t2.b AND t3.c=t4.d AND (t2.b=t3.c OR t4.e>5 ...) AND ...
+ Given the tables are accessed in the order t1->t2->t3->t4 for
+ the selected query execution plan the lower level multiple
+ equality =(t1.a,t2.b,t3.c,t4.d) formally should be converted to
+ t1.a=t2.b AND t1.a=t3.c AND t1.a=t4.d. But t1.a=t2.a will be
+ generated for the upper level. Also t3.c=t4.d will be generated there.
+ So only t1.a=t3.c should be left in the lower level.
+ If cond is equal to 0, then not more then one equality is generated
+ and a pointer to it is returned as the result of the function.
+
+ RETURN
+ The condition with generated simple equalities or
+ a pointer to the simple generated equality, if success.
+ 0, otherwise.
+*/
+
+static Item *eliminate_item_equal(COND *cond, COND_EQUAL *upper_levels,
+ Item_equal *item_equal)
+{
+ List<Item> eq_list;
+ Item_func_eq *eq_item= 0;
+ Item *item_const= item_equal->get_const();
+ Item_equal_iterator it(*item_equal);
+ Item *head;
+ if (item_const)
+ head= item_const;
+ else
+ {
+ head= item_equal->get_first();
+ it++;
+ }
+ Item_field *item_field;
+ while ((item_field= it++))
+ {
+ Item_equal *upper= item_field->find_item_equal(upper_levels);
+ Item_field *item= item_field;
+ if (upper)
+ {
+ if (item_const && upper->get_const())
+ item= 0;
+ else
+ {
+ Item_equal_iterator li(*item_equal);
+ while ((item= li++) != item_field)
+ {
+ if (item->find_item_equal(upper_levels) == upper)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if (item == item_field)
+ {
+ if (eq_item)
+ eq_list.push_back(eq_item);
+ eq_item= new Item_func_eq(item_field, head);
+ if (!eq_item)
+ return 0;
+ eq_item->set_cmp_func();
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!cond && !eq_list.head())
+ return eq_item;
+
+ eq_list.push_back(eq_item);
+ if (!cond)
+ cond= new Item_cond_and(eq_list);
+ else
+ ((Item_cond *) cond)->add_at_head(&eq_list);
+
+ return cond;
+}
+
+
+/*
+ Substitute every field reference in a condition by the best equal field
+ and eliminate all multiplle equality predicates
+
+ SYNOPSIS
+ substitute_for_best_equal_field()
+ cond condition to process
+ cond_equal multiple equalities to take into consideration
+ table_join_idx index to tables determining field preference
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ The function retrieves the cond condition and for each encountered
+ multiple equality predicate it sorts the field references in it
+ according to the order of tables specified by the table_join_idx
+ parameter. Then it eliminates the multiple equality predicate it
+ replacing it by the conjunction of simple equality predicates
+ equating every field from the multiple equality to the first
+ field in it, or to the constant, if there is any.
+ After this the function retrieves all other conjuncted
+ predicates substitute every field reference by the field reference
+ to the first equal field or equal constant if there are any.
+
+ NOTES
+ At the first glance full sort of fields in multiple equality
+ seems to be an overkill. Yet it's not the case due to possible
+ new fields in multiple equality item of lower levels. We want
+ the order in them to comply with the order of upper levels.
+
+ RETURN
+ The transformed condition
+*/
+
+static COND* substitute_for_best_equal_field(COND *cond,
+ COND_EQUAL *cond_equal,
+ void *table_join_idx)
+{
+ Item_equal *item_equal;
+
+ if (cond->type() == Item::COND_ITEM)
+ {
+ List<Item> *cond_list= ((Item_cond*) cond)->argument_list();
+
+ bool and_level= ((Item_cond*) cond)->functype() ==
+ Item_func::COND_AND_FUNC;
+ if (and_level)
+ {
+ cond_equal= &((Item_cond_and *) cond)->cond_equal;
+ cond_list->disjoin((List<Item> *) &cond_equal->current_level);
+
+ List_iterator_fast<Item_equal> it(cond_equal->current_level);
+ while ((item_equal= it++))
+ {
+ item_equal->sort(&compare_fields_by_table_order, table_join_idx);
+ }
+ }
+
+ List_iterator<Item> li(*cond_list);
+ Item *item;
+ while ((item= li++))
+ {
+ Item *new_item =substitute_for_best_equal_field(item, cond_equal,
+ table_join_idx);
+ if (new_item != item)
+ li.replace(new_item);
+ }
+
+ if (and_level)
+ {
+ List_iterator_fast<Item_equal> it(cond_equal->current_level);
+ while ((item_equal= it++))
+ {
+ eliminate_item_equal(cond, cond_equal->upper_levels, item_equal);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ else if (cond->type() == Item::FUNC_ITEM &&
+ ((Item_cond*) cond)->functype() == Item_func::MULT_EQUAL_FUNC)
+ {
+ item_equal= (Item_equal *) cond;
+ item_equal->sort(&compare_fields_by_table_order, table_join_idx);
+ if (cond_equal && cond_equal->current_level.head() == item_equal)
+ cond_equal= 0;
+ return eliminate_item_equal(0, cond_equal, item_equal);
+ }
+ else
+ cond->walk(&Item::replace_equal_field_processor, 0);
+ return cond;
+}
+
+
/*
change field = field to field = const for each found field = const in the
and_level
@@ -6164,15 +6997,13 @@ simplify_joins(JOIN *join, List<TABLE_LIST> *join_list, COND *conds, bool top)
li.replace(nested_join->join_list);
}
}
- DBUG_RETURN(conds);
-}
-
-
+ DBUG_RETURN(conds);
+
static COND *
optimize_cond(JOIN *join, COND *conds, Item::cond_result *cond_value)
{
THD *thd= join->thd;
- SELECT_LEX *select= thd->lex->current_select;
+ SELECT_LEX *select= thd->lex->current_select;}
DBUG_ENTER("optimize_cond");
if (select->first_cond_optimization)
@@ -6216,7 +7047,6 @@ optimize_cond(JOIN *join, COND *conds, Item::cond_result *cond_value)
DBUG_EXECUTE("where",print_where(conds,"after const change"););
conds= remove_eq_conds(thd, conds, cond_value) ;
DBUG_EXECUTE("info",print_where(conds,"after remove"););
- }
DBUG_RETURN(conds);
}
@@ -6340,6 +7170,11 @@ remove_eq_conds(THD *thd, COND *cond, Item::cond_result *cond_value)
}
}
}
+ if (cond->const_item())
+ {
+ *cond_value= eval_const_cond(cond) ? Item::COND_TRUE : Item::COND_FALSE;
+ return (COND*) 0;
+ }
}
else if (cond->const_item())
{
@@ -9843,6 +10678,7 @@ join_init_cache(THD *thd,JOIN_TAB *tables,uint table_count)
}
if (!(cache->field=(CACHE_FIELD*)
sql_alloc(sizeof(CACHE_FIELD)*(cache->fields+table_count*2)+(blobs+1)*
+
sizeof(CACHE_FIELD*))))
{
my_free((gptr) cache->buff,MYF(0)); /* purecov: inspected */