| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Incorrect processing of an auto-incrementing field in the
WSREP-related code during applying transactions results in
a duplicate key being created. This is due to the fact that
at the beginning of the write_row() and update_row() functions,
the values of the auto-increment parameters are used, which
are read from the parameters of the current thread, but further
along the code other values are used, which are read from global
variables (when applying a transaction). This can happen when
the cluster configuration has changed while applying a transaction
(for example in the high_priority_service mode for Galera 4).
Further during IST processing duplicating key is detected, and
processing of the DB_DUPLICATE_KEY return code (inside innodb,
in the write_row() handler) results in a call to the
wsrep_thd_self_abort() function.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove incorrect BF (brute force) handling from lock_rec_has_to_wait_in_queue
and move condition to correct callers. Add a function to report
BF lock waits and assert if incorrect BF-BF lock wait happens.
wsrep_report_bf_lock_wait
Add a new function to report BF lock wait.
wsrep_assert_no_bf_bf_wait
Add a new function to check do we have a
BF-BF wait and if we have report this case
and assert as it is a bug.
lock_rec_has_to_wait
Use new wsrep_assert_bf_wait to check BF-BF wait.
lock_rec_create_low
lock_table_create
Use new function to report BF lock waits.
lock_rec_insert_by_trx_age
lock_grant_and_move_on_page
lock_grant_and_move_on_rec
Assert that trx is not Galera as VATS is not compatible
with Galera.
lock_rec_add_to_queue
If there is conflicting lock in a queue make sure that
transaction is BF.
lock_rec_has_to_wait_in_queue
Remove incorrect BF handling. If there is conflicting
locks in a queue all transactions must wait.
lock_rec_dequeue_from_page
lock_rec_unlock
If there is conflicting lock make sure it is not
BF-BF case.
lock_rec_queue_validate
Add Galera record locking rules comment and use
new function to report BF lock waits.
All attempts to reproduce the original assertion have been
failed. Therefore, there is no test case on this commit.
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 21b2fada7ab7f35c898c02d2f918461409cc9c8e
and commit 81d71ee6b21870772c336bff15b71904914f146a.
The MDEV-18464 change introduces a few data race issues. Contrary to
the documentation, the field trx_t::victim is not always being protected
by lock_sys_t::mutex and trx_t::mutex. Most importantly, it seems
that KILL QUERY could wrongly avoid acquiring both mutexes when
invoking lock_trx_handle_wait_low(), in case another thread had
already set trx->victim=true.
We also revert MDEV-12009, because it should depend on the MDEV-18464
fix being present.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
priority by Galera
As noted on kill_one_thread SUPER should be able to kill even
system threads i.e. threads/query flagged as high priority or
wsrep applier thread. Normal user, should not able to kill
threads/query flagged as high priority (BF) or wsrep applier
thread.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If we have a 2+ node cluster which is replicating from an async master
and the binlog_format is set to STATEMENT and multi-row inserts are executed
on a table with an auto_increment column such that values are automatically
generated by MySQL, then the server node generates wrong auto_increment
values, which are different from what was generated on the async master.
In the title of the MDEV-9519 it was proposed to ban start slave on a Galera
if master binlog_format = statement and wsrep_auto_increment_control = 1,
but the problem can be solved without such a restriction.
The causes and fixes:
1. We need to improve processing of changing the auto-increment values
after changing the cluster size.
2. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched on during operation of
the node, then we should immediately update the auto_increment_increment
and auto_increment_offset global variables, without waiting of the next
invocation of the wsrep_view_handler_cb() callback. In the current version
these variables retain its initial values if wsrep_auto_increment_control
is switched on during operation of the node, which leads to inconsistent
results on the different nodes in some scenarios.
3. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched off during operation of the node,
then we must return the original values of the auto_increment_increment and
auto_increment_offset global variables, as the user has set. To make this
possible, we need to add a "shadow copies" of these variables (which stores
the latest values set by the user).
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-9519
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This patch contains a fix for the MDEV-17262/17243 issues and
new mtr test.
These issues (MDEV-17262/17243) have two reasons:
1) After an intermediate commit, a transaction loses its status
of "transaction that registered in the MySQL for 2pc coordinator"
(in the InnoDB) due to the fact that since version 10.2 the
write_row() function (which located in the ha_innodb.cc) does
not call trx_register_for_2pc(m_prebuilt->trx) during the processing
of split transactions. It is necessary to restore this call inside
the write_row() when an intermediate commit was made (for a split
transaction).
Similarly, we need to set the flag of the started transaction
(m_prebuilt->sql_stat_start) after intermediate commit.
The table->file->extra(HA_EXTRA_FAKE_START_STMT) called from the
wsrep_load_data_split() function (which located in sql_load.cc)
will also do this, but it will be too late. As a result, the call
to the wsrep_append_keys() function from the InnoDB engine may be
lost or function may be called with invalid transaction identifier.
2) If a transaction with the LOAD DATA statement is divided into
logical mini-transactions (of the 10K rows) and binlog is rotated,
then in rare cases due to the wsrep handler re-registration at the
boundary of the split, the last portion of data may be lost. Since
splitting of the LOAD DATA into mini-transactions is technical,
I believe that we should not allow these mini-transactions to fall
into separate binlogs. Therefore, it is necessary to prohibit the
rotation of binlog in the middle of processing LOAD DATA statement.
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-17262 and
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-17243
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Problem was that we skipped background persistent statistics calculation
on applier nodes if thread is marked as high priority (a.k.a BF).
However, on applier nodes all DDL which is replicate will be executed
as high priority i.e BF.
Fixed by allowing background persistent statistics calculation on
applier nodes even when thread is marked as BF. This could lead
BF lock waits but for queries on that node needs that statistics.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If we have a 2+ node cluster which is replicating from an async master
and the binlog_format is set to STATEMENT and multi-row inserts are executed
on a table with an auto_increment column such that values are automatically
generated by MySQL, then the server node generates wrong auto_increment
values, which are different from what was generated on the async master.
In the title of the MDEV-9519 it was proposed to ban start slave on a Galera
if master binlog_format = statement and wsrep_auto_increment_control = 1,
but the problem can be solved without such a restriction.
The causes and fixes:
1. We need to improve processing of changing the auto-increment values
after changing the cluster size.
2. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched on during operation of
the node, then we should immediately update the auto_increment_increment
and auto_increment_offset global variables, without waiting of the next
invocation of the wsrep_view_handler_cb() callback. In the current version
these variables retain its initial values if wsrep_auto_increment_control
is switched on during operation of the node, which leads to inconsistent
results on the different nodes in some scenarios.
3. If wsrep auto_increment_control switched off during operation of the node,
then we must return the original values of the auto_increment_increment and
auto_increment_offset global variables, as the user has set. To make this
possible, we need to add a "shadow copies" of these variables (which stores
the latest values set by the user).
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-9519
|
| |\ \
| |/ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Post-fix for 7e8ed15b95b
Also, apply the same innodb fix to xtradb.
|
| |\ \
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Also, include fixes by Vladislav Vaintroub to the
aws_key_management plugin. The AWS C++ SDK specifically depends on
OPENSSL_LIBRARIES, not generic SSL_LIBRARIES (such as YaSSL).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Added service for
- encryption (AES)
- error reporting, e.g my_printf_error()
|
| |\ \
| |/ |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Also, renamed wsrep_skip_append_keys to wsrep_ignore_table.
Test case : galera.galera_as_slave_gtid.test
|
| |
|
|
| |
Note: some tests fail, just as they failed before the merge!
|
| | |
|
| |
|
