| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The problem happened in these line:
uval0= (ulonglong) (val0_negative ? -val0 : val0);
uval1= (ulonglong) (val1_negative ? -val1 : val1);
return check_integer_overflow(val0_negative ? -(longlong) res : res,
!val0_negative);
when unary minus was performed on -9223372036854775808.
This behavior is undefined in C/C++.
|
| |
|
|
| |
* Update wrong zip-code
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, backporting a part of:
MDEV-11485 Split Item_func_between::val_int() into virtual methods in Type_handler
for easier merge to 10.3.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unary minus operation for the smallest possible signed long long value
(LONLONG_MIN) is undefined in C++. Because of this, func_time.test
failed on ppc64 buildbot machines.
Fixing the code to avod using undefined operations.
This is fix is similar to "MDEV-7973 bigint fail with gcc 5.0"
|
| |
|
