From 7bb07fd4c301ed67ed083febb2e0fcf4be2e6631 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: unknown Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:00:06 -0800 Subject: Fixed bug #14274: a query with a having clause containing only set function returned a wrong result set. mysql-test/r/having.result: Added a test case for bug #14274. mysql-test/t/having.test: Added a test case for bug #14274. sql/sql_select.cc: Fixed bug #14274: a query with a having clause containing only set function returned a wrong result set. It happened because processing of the set functions in having started with a call of the split_sum_func method, instead of the split_sum_func2 method. --- sql/sql_select.cc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'sql/sql_select.cc') diff --git a/sql/sql_select.cc b/sql/sql_select.cc index 5e29c98e2c8..09900c89307 100644 --- a/sql/sql_select.cc +++ b/sql/sql_select.cc @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ JOIN::prepare(Item ***rref_pointer_array, if (having_fix_rc || thd->net.report_error) DBUG_RETURN(-1); /* purecov: inspected */ if (having->with_sum_func) - having->split_sum_func(thd, ref_pointer_array, all_fields); + having->split_sum_func2(thd, ref_pointer_array, all_fields, &having); } // Is it subselect -- cgit v1.2.1