blob: 87366f41ba2c100047612bd6a4fb4ca7f62f2a0d (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
|
source include/master-slave.inc;
CALL mtr.add_suppression("Statement may not be safe to log in statement format.");
create table t1(n int);
# Use of get_lock gives a warning for unsafeness if binlog_format=statement
--disable_warnings
insert into t1 values(get_lock("lock",2));
--enable_warnings
dirty_close master;
connection master1;
select get_lock("lock",2);
select release_lock("lock");
#ignore
disable_query_log;
let $1=2000;
while ($1)
{
do get_lock("lock",2);
do release_lock("lock");
dec $1;
}
enable_query_log;
save_master_pos;
connection slave;
sync_with_master;
select get_lock("lock",3);
select * from t1;
# There is no point in testing REPLICATIION of the IS_*_LOCK
# functions; slave does not run with the same concurrency context as
# master (generally in slave we can't know that on master this lock
# was already held by another connection and so that the the
# get_lock() we're replicating timed out on master hence returned 0,
# or that the is_free_lock() we're playing returned 0 etc.
# But here all we do is test these functions outside of replication.
select is_free_lock("lock"), is_used_lock("lock") = connection_id();
explain extended select is_free_lock("lock"), is_used_lock("lock");
# Check lock functions
select is_free_lock("lock2");
select is_free_lock(NULL);
connection master1;
drop table t1;
save_master_pos;
connection slave;
sync_with_master;
# End of 4.1 tests
|
