1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
|
#
# This include file is used by more than one test suite
# (currently rpl and binlog_encryption).
# Please check all dependent tests after modifying it
#
#############################################################################
# Original Author: JBM #
# Original Date: Aug/18/2005 #
#############################################################################
# TEST: To test the LOAD_FILE() in rbr #
#############################################################################
# Change Author: JBM
# Change Date: 2006-01-16
##########
# Includes
-- source include/have_binlog_format_mixed_or_row.inc
-- source include/master-slave.inc
-- source suite/rpl/include/rpl_loadfile.test
# BUG#39701: Mixed binlog format does not switch to row mode on LOAD_FILE
#
# DESCRIPTION
#
# Problem: when using load_file string function and mixed binlogging format
# there was no switch to row based binlogging format. This leads
# to scenarios on which the slave replicates the statement and it
# will try to load the file from local file system, which in most
# likely it will not exist.
#
# Solution:
# Marking this function as unsafe for statement format, makes the
# statement using it to be logged in row based format. As such, data
# replicated from the master, becomes the content of the loaded file.
# Consequently, the slave receives the necessary data to complete
# the load_file instruction correctly.
#
# IMPLEMENTATION
#
# The test is implemented as follows:
#
# On Master,
# i) write to file the desired content.
# ii) create table and stored procedure with load_file
# iii) stop slave
# iii) execute load_file
# iv) remove file
#
# On Slave,
# v) start slave
# vi) sync it with master so that it gets the updates from binlog (which
# should have bin logged in row format).
#
# If the the binlog format does not change to row, then the assertion
# done in the following step fails. This happens because tables differ
# since the file does not exist anymore, meaning that when slave
# attempts to execute LOAD_FILE statement it inserts NULL on table
# instead of the same contents that the master loaded when it executed
# the procedure (which was executed when file existed).
#
# vii) assert that the contents of master and slave
# table are the same
--source include/rpl_reset.inc
connection master;
let $file= $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/bug_39701.data;
--replace_result $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR MYSQLTEST_VARDIR
--eval SELECT repeat('x',20) INTO OUTFILE '$file'
disable_warnings;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
enable_warnings;
CREATE TABLE t1 (t text);
DELIMITER |;
CREATE PROCEDURE p(file varchar(4096))
BEGIN
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (LOAD_FILE(file));
END|
DELIMITER ;|
# stop slave before issuing the load_file on master
connection slave;
source include/stop_slave.inc;
connection master;
# test: check that logging falls back to rbr.
--replace_result $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR MYSQLTEST_VARDIR
--eval CALL p('$file')
# test: remove the file from the filesystem and assert that slave still
# gets the loaded file
remove_file $file;
# now that the file is removed it is safe (regarding what we want to test)
# to start slave
connection slave;
source include/start_slave.inc;
connection master;
sync_slave_with_master;
# assertion: assert that the slave got the updates even
# if the file was removed before the slave started,
# meaning that contents were indeed transfered
# through binlog (in row format)
let $diff_tables= master:t1, slave:t1;
source include/diff_tables.inc;
# CLEAN UP
--connection master
DROP TABLE t1;
DROP PROCEDURE p;
--source include/rpl_end.inc
|
