From e1e539f952d8afa2c2bc856f5aa9c93d51468f71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:34:49 +1100
Subject: Detail: don't report a faulty device as 'spare' or 'rebuilding'.

If a device is faulty, then that is all there is too it.
Even if it isn't 'removed' yet, it shouldn't be reported as 'spare'
or 'rebuilding'.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
 Detail.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Detail.c b/Detail.c
index 07a00cb..946b5e9 100644
--- a/Detail.c
+++ b/Detail.c
@@ -543,7 +543,8 @@ This is pretty boring
 			if (disk.state & (1<<MD_DISK_REMOVED)) printf(" removed");
 			if (disk.state & (1<<MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY)) printf(" writemostly");
 			if ((disk.state &
-			     ((1<<MD_DISK_ACTIVE)|(1<<MD_DISK_SYNC)|(1<<MD_DISK_REMOVED)))
+			     ((1<<MD_DISK_ACTIVE)|(1<<MD_DISK_SYNC)
+			      |(1<<MD_DISK_REMOVED)|(1<<MD_DISK_FAULTY)))
 			    == 0) {
 				printf(" spare");
 				if (is_26) {
-- 
cgit v1.2.1