1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
|
// Cannot implicitly shard accessed collections because of following errmsg: A single
// update/delete on a sharded collection must contain an exact match on _id or contain the shard
// key.
// @tags: [assumes_unsharded_collection]
// Ensures that find and modify will not apply an update to a document which, due to a concurrent
// modification, no longer matches the query predicate.
(function() {
"use strict";
// Repeat the test a few times, as the timing of the yield means it won't fail consistently.
for (var i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
var t = db.find_and_modify_concurrent;
t.drop();
assert.commandWorked(t.ensureIndex({a: 1}));
assert.commandWorked(t.ensureIndex({b: 1}));
assert.writeOK(t.insert({_id: 1, a: 1, b: 1}));
var join = startParallelShell(
"db.find_and_modify_concurrent.update({a: 1, b: 1}, {$inc: {a: 1}});");
// Due to the sleep, we expect this find and modify to yield before updating the
// document.
var res = t.findAndModify(
{query: {a: 1, b: 1, $where: "sleep(100); return true;"}, update: {$inc: {a: 1}}});
join();
var docs = t.find().toArray();
assert.eq(docs.length, 1);
// Both the find and modify and the update operations look for a document with a==1,
// and then increment 'a' by 1. One should win the race and set a=2. The other should
// fail to find a match. The assertion is that 'a' got incremented once (not zero times
// and not twice).
assert.eq(docs[0].a, 2);
}
})();
|
