1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
|
var t = db.hashindex1;
t.drop()
//test non-single field hashed indexes don't get created (maybe change later)
var badspec = {a : "hashed" , b : 1};
t.ensureIndex( badspec );
assert.eq( t.getIndexes().length , 1 , "only _id index should be created");
//test unique index not created (maybe change later)
var goodspec = {a : "hashed"};
t.ensureIndex( goodspec , {"unique" : true});
assert.eq( t.getIndexes().length , 1 , "unique index got created.");
//now test that non-unique index does get created
t.ensureIndex(goodspec);
assert.eq( t.getIndexes().length , 2 , "hashed index didn't get created");
//test basic inserts
for(i=0; i < 10; i++ ){
t.insert( {a:i } );
}
assert.eq( t.find().count() , 10 , "basic insert didn't work");
assert.eq( t.find().hint(goodspec).toArray().length , 10 , "basic insert didn't work");
assert.eq( t.find({a : 3}).hint({_id : 1}).toArray()[0]._id ,
t.find({a : 3}).hint(goodspec).toArray()[0]._id ,
"hashindex lookup didn't work" );
//make sure things with the same hash are not both returned
t.insert( {a: 3.1} );
assert.eq( t.find().count() , 11 , "additional insert didn't work");
assert.eq( t.find({a : 3.1}).hint(goodspec).toArray().length , 1);
assert.eq( t.find({a : 3}).hint(goodspec).toArray().length , 1);
//test right obj is found
assert.eq( t.find({a : 3.1}).hint(goodspec).toArray()[0].a , 3.1);
//test that hashed cursor is used when it should be
var cursorname = "BtreeCursor a_hashed";
assert.eq( t.find({a : 1}).explain().cursor ,
cursorname ,
"not using hashed cursor");
assert.eq( t.find({a : {$gte : 3 , $lte : 3}}).explain().cursor ,
cursorname ,
"not using hashed cursor");
assert.neq( t.find({c : 1}).explain().cursor ,
cursorname ,
"using irrelevant hashed cursor");
/* This test should work but doesn't yet because of the way queries are
* simplified before being passed to 'suitability'. When this issue is
* fixed this test can be added.
*
assert.eq( t.find({a : {$in : [1,2]}}).explain()["cursor"] ,
cursorname ,
"not using hashed cursor");
*/
//test creation of index based on hash of _id index
var goodspec2 = {'_id' : "hashed"};
t.ensureIndex( goodspec2 );
assert.eq( t.getIndexes().length , 3 , "_id index didn't get created");
var newid = t.findOne()["_id"];
assert.eq( t.find( {_id : newid} ).hint( {_id : 1} ).toArray()[0]._id ,
t.find( {_id : newid} ).hint( goodspec2 ).toArray()[0]._id,
"using hashed index and different index returns different docs");
//test creation of sparse hashed index
var sparseindex = {b : "hashed"};
t.ensureIndex( sparseindex , {"sparse" : true});
assert.eq( t.getIndexes().length , 4 , "sparse index didn't get created");
//test sparse index has smaller total items on after inserts
for(i=0; i < 10; i++ ){
t.insert( {b : i} );
}
var totalb = t.find().hint(sparseindex).toArray().length;
assert.eq( totalb , 10 , "sparse index has wrong total");
var total = t.find().hint({"_id" : 1}).toArray().length;
var totala = t.find().hint(goodspec).toArray().length;
assert.eq(total , totala , "non-sparse index has wrong total");
assert.lt(totalb , totala , "sparse index should have smaller total");
|
