diff options
author | zimmerma <zimmerma@280ebfd0-de03-0410-8827-d642c229c3f4> | 2007-10-15 14:11:22 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | zimmerma <zimmerma@280ebfd0-de03-0410-8827-d642c229c3f4> | 2007-10-15 14:11:22 +0000 |
commit | ae15e86d54d3c912578b238f91e2ca377fcb1413 (patch) | |
tree | 720523c52266741494e29fc42d8f12e234e49ce2 | |
parent | 7583bbab6d952e34100ed5208faf9394facffc8b (diff) | |
download | mpfr-ae15e86d54d3c912578b238f91e2ca377fcb1413.tar.gz |
added item in Efficiency section
git-svn-id: svn://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/mpfr/trunk@4895 280ebfd0-de03-0410-8827-d642c229c3f4
-rw-r--r-- | TODO | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -292,6 +292,12 @@ Table of contents: possible through stripping low zero bits or limbs could check for that (this would be less efficient but easier). +- try the idea of the paper "Reduced Cancellation in the Evaluation of Entire + Functions and Applications to the Error Function" by W. Gawronski, J. Mueller + and M. Reinhard, to be published in SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis: to + avoid cancellation in say erfc(x) for x large, they compute the Taylor + expansion of erfc(x)*exp(x^2/2) instead (which has less cancellation), + and then divide by exp(x^2/2) (which is simpler to compute). ############################################################################## 6. Miscellaneous |