summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libnautilus-private/nautilus-profile.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* general: merge libnautilus-private to srcwip/csoriano/private-to-srcCarlos Soriano2016-04-251-56/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | And fix make distcheck. Although libnautilus-private seem self contained, it was actually depending on the files on src/ for dnd. Not only that, but files in libnautilus-private also were depending on dnd files, which you can guess it's wrong. Before the desktop split, this was working because the files were distributed, but now was a problem since we reestructured the code, and now nautilus being a library make distcheck stop working. First solution was try to fix this inter dependency of files, but at some point I realized that there was no real point on splitting some of those files, because for example, is perfectly fine for dnd to need to access the window functions, and it's perfectly fine for the widgets in the private library to need to access to all dnd functions. So seems to me the private library of nautilus is somehow an artificial split, which provides more problems than solutions. We needed libnautilus-private to have a private library that we could isolate from extensions, but I don't think it worth given the problems it provides, and also, this not so good logical split. Right now, since with the desktop split we created a libnautilus to be used by the desktop part of nautilus, extensions have access to all the API of nautilus. We will think in future how this can be handled if we want. So for now, merge the libnautilus-private into src, and let's rethink a better logic to split the code and the private parts of nautilus than what we had. Thanks a lot to Rafael Fonseca for helping in get this done. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765543
* general: remove vim modelinesCarlos Soriano2016-04-041-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Vim and emacs modelines are used to specify some of the code style in the code. However, this is misleading and poorly supported since nautilus had a mix of code style for some time. Also, the mode lines doesn't specify the whole code style, so we will need to use a different tool as well to specify the whole code style. For that, we can just use a different tool for everything. So remove the mode lines, and in a short future we will reestyle the nautilus code to have a single code style, and use a tool like editorconfig to specify the whole code style.
* Updated FSF's addressDaniel Mustieles2014-01-311-2/+1
|
* Add profiling supportWilliam Jon McCann2012-08-081-0/+58
Can now be profiled like so: strace -ttt -f -o /tmp/logfile.strace nautilus python plot-timeline.py -o prettygraph.png /tmp/logfile.strace See: http://www.gnome.org/~federico/news-2006-03.html#09