| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After submitting a GO_IDLE bundle, one must wait for GR to effectively
be idle before submitting the next bundle. Failure to do so may result
in undefined behavior in some rare cases.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Kary Jin <karyj@nvidia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When emitting the ICMD bundle, wait on the bottom half (bit 3 of the
GR_STATUS register) instead of upper half (bit 2) to make sure methods
are effectively emitted.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Kicking channels is part of their deactivation process. Maxwell chips
are particularly sensitive to this, and can start fetching the previous
pushbuffer of a recycled channel if this is not done.
While we are at it, improve the channel preemption code to only wait for
bit 20 of 0x002634 to turn to 0, as it is the bit indicating a
preempt is pending.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Increase clock timeout for SYS, FPB and GPC in order to avoid operation
failure at high gpcclk rate.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The lack of IOMMU API support can make nouveau_platform_probe_iommu()
fail to compile because struct iommu_ops is then empty. Fix this by
skipping IOMMU probe in that case - lack of IOMMU on platform devices
is sub-optimal, but is not an error.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The memory allocated for a nouveau_cli object in nouveau_cli_create() is
never freed. Free the memory in nouveau_cli_destroy() to plug this leak.
kmemleak recorded this after running a couple of nouveau test programs.
Note that kmemleak points at drm_open_helper() because for some reason
it thinks that skipping the first two stack frames is a good idea.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tested on a few cards. Probably works quite well for most, given they should
all be GDDR3.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This looks surprisingly similar to scripts on earlier cards as well
but they don't seem to work just yet. That... and I don't have any, which
makes it a tough job to reverse engineer.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some of the bits in there are similar to the bits in the gt215 rammap.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Might need some generalisation to < GT200. For those: use at your own risk!
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Like on GT215
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In preparation of NV50 reclocking, where there is no version
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This difference can of course be negative too...
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was merged with core/device.h in an earlier commit, but somehow
never got removed.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Should fix fdo#89558
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
And also more generic, so it can be used on newer chipsets.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 3740c82590d8 ("drm/nouveau/gr/gf100-: add symbolic names for
classes") introduced a wrong macro definition causing acceleration setup
to fail. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Lars Seipel <ls@slrz.net>
Fixes: 3740c82590d8 ("drm/nouveau/gr/gf100-: add symbolic names for classes")
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
nvbios_extend() returns 1 to indicate "extended the array" and 0 to
indicate the array is already big enough. This is used by the core
shadowing code to prevent re-fetching chunks of the image that have
already been shadowed.
The ACPI fetching code may possibly need to extend this further due
to requiring fetches to happen in 4KiB chunks.
Under certain circumstances (that happen if the total image size is
a multiple of 4KiB), the memory allocated to store the shadow will
already be big enough, causing the ACPI code's nvbios_extend() call
to return 0, which is misinterpreted as a failure.
The fix is simple, accept >= 0 as a successful condition here. The
core will have already made sure that we're not re-fetching data we
already have.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89047
v2 (Ben Skeggs):
- dropped hunk which would cause unnecessary re-fetching
- more descriptive explanation
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jano.vesely@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Uncertain whether the GPC pack change is due to a newer driver version,
or a legitimate difference from GM204. My GM204 has broken vram, so
can't currently try a newer binary driver on it to confirm.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Under certain circumstances the trapped address will contain subc 7,
which GK104 GR doesn't have anymore.
Notice this case to avoid causing additional priv ring faults.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No idea if "3" is a constant or derived from something else, but the
value is unchanged in the limited traces of gm107/gm204 I have here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make static a few functions and structures that should be.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A "return 0" found its way in the middle of the error path of
nouveau_platform_probe(), remove it as it will make the kernel crash if
we try to unload the module afterwards.
While we are at it, also remove the IOMMU domain if it has been created,
as we should.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
nvkm_mm_fini() was not called when exiting the driver, resulting in a
memory leak. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On some of these chipsets, reading NV_PGRAPH_GPC_GPM_PD_PES_TPC_ID_MASK
can trigger a PRI fault and return an error code instead of a TPC mask,
unless PGOB has been disabled first.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before we moved gk110's implementation of this to pmu, the functions were
identical. This commit just switches GK208 to use the new (more complete)
implementation of the power-up sequence.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Turns out the PTHERM part of this dance is bracketed by the same PMU
fiddling that occurs on GK104/6, let's assume it's also PGOB.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So we can actually use the full 512 byte code space
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a memory allocation fails when using the DMA allocator,
gk20a_instobj_dtor_dma() will be called on the failed instmem object.
At this time, node->handle might not be NULL despite the call to
dma_alloc_attrs() having failed. node->cpuaddr is the right member to
check for such a failure, so use it instead.
Reported-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|