FAQ: how to upgrade from Objective Caml 3.02 to 3.03 I Installation Q1: When compiling the distribution, I am getting strange linking errors in "otherlibraries". A1: This is probably a problem with dynamic linking. You can disable it with ./configure -no-shared-libs. If you really want to use shared libraries, look in the manual pages of your system for how to get some debugging output from the dynamic linker. II Non-label changes Q2: I get a syntax error when I try to compile a program using stream parsers. A2: Stream parser now require camlp4. It is included in the distribution, and you just need to use "ocamlc -pp camlp4o" in place of "ocamlc". You can also use it under the toplevel with #load"camlp4o.cma". Q3: I get a warning when I use the syntax "#variant" inside type expressions. A3: The new syntax is [< variant], which just a special case of the more general new syntax, which allows type expressions like [ variant1 | variant2] or [> variant]. See the reference manual for details. III Label changes Q4: I was using labels before, and now I get lots of type errors. A4: The handling of labels changed with 3.03-alpha. The new default is a more flexible version of the commuting label mode, allowing one to omit labels in total applications. There is still a -nolabels mode, but it does not allow non-optional labels in applications (this was unsound). To keep full compatibility with Objective Caml 2, labels were removed from the standard libraries. Some labelized libraries are kept as StdLabels (contains Array, List and String), MoreLabels (contains Hashtbl, Map and Set), and UnixLabels. Note that MoreLabels' status is not yet decided. Q5: Why isn't there a ThreadUnixLabels module ? A5: ThreadUnix is deprecated. It only calls directly the Unix module. Q6: I was using commuting label mode, how can I upgrade ? A6: The new behaviour is compatible with commuting label mode, but standard libraries have no labels. You can add the following lines at the beginning of your files (according to your needs): open Stdlabels open MoreLabels module Unix = UnixLabels Alternatively, if you already have a common module opened by everybody, you can add these: include StdLabels include MoreLabels module Unix = UnixLabels You will then need to remove labels in functions from other modules. This can be automated by using the scrapelabels tool, installed in the Objective Caml library directory, which both removes labels and inserts needed `open' clauses (see -help for details). $CAMLLIB/scrapelabels -keepstd *.ml or $CAMLLIB/scrapelabels -keepmore *.ml Note that scrapelabels is not guaranteed to be sound for commuting label programs, since it will just remove labels, and not reorder arguments. Q7: I was using a few labels in classic mode, and now I get all these errors. I just want to get rid of all these silly labels. A7: scrapelabels will do it for you. $CAMLLIB/scrapelabels [-all] *.ml $CAMLLIB/scrapelabels -intf *.mli You should specify the -all option only if you are sure that your sources do not contain calls to functions with optional parameters, as those labels would also be removed. Q8: I was using labels in classic mode, and I was actually pretty fond of them. How much more labels will I have to write now ? How can I convert my programs and libraries ? A8: The new default mode is more flexible than the original commuting mode, so that you shouldn't see too much differences when using labeled libraries. Labels are only compulsory in partial applications (including the special case of function with an unknown return type), or if you wrote some of them. On the other hand, for definitions, labels present in the interface must also be present in the implementation. The addlabels tool can help you to do that. Suppose that you have mymod.ml and mymod.mli, where mymod.mli adds some labels. Then doing $CAMLLIB/addlabels mymod.ml will insert labels from the interface inside the implementation. It also takes care of inserting them in recursive calls, as the return type of the function is not known while typing it. If you used labels from standard libraries, you will also have problems with them. You can proceed as described in A6. Since you used classic mode, you do not need to bother about changed argument order.