summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJames E. Blair <jeblair@redhat.com>2020-04-24 11:07:05 -0700
committerJames E. Blair <jeblair@redhat.com>2020-04-29 15:00:05 -0700
commit15ef181d269b5a01b825baf8b7b21f49cc7f58fa (patch)
tree4be05bd7297659f45cd28e3b7a9e9bea0b673fb8
parent22640baef4d33c80135aace1d11a223278b02e57 (diff)
downloadzuul-15ef181d269b5a01b825baf8b7b21f49cc7f58fa.tar.gz
Make fake test Gerrit merger more realistic
The current Gerrit simulated merge operation simply resets the target branch to the specified change's commit -- it doesn't actually perform a git merge operation as gerrit (typically) would. This makes some test situations difficult, such as when we want to rely on a post-merge pipeline preparing git repos on top of previously merged changes. This change actually performs git merge operations when gerrit changes are merged in tests, so the result should be far more realistic. One test relied on a side effect of the old behavior: test_zuul_trigger_project_change_merged This test merges change A and then performed a merge check on change B, which conflicts, and then reports Verified -1. It then repeats the test by merging change D which conflicts with change E which should also receive Verified -1. However, the test inadvertently ran a second merge check on change B when change D merged, but because it tested D as written instead of merged on top of A after A was merged, the conflict of B against A was not seen (because B does not conflict with D) and therefore not rported. With this patch, the conflict of B against the merged change A is seen and the test failed because it reported B's merge conflict twice. To correct this, we make the test even more realistic by adding a pipeline requirement that we have not already reported Verified -1 in order to enqueue a change for merge-check. In order for this to work, we need to make sure Zuul sees the comment-added events for the Verified -1 votes (so that the Gerrit driver updates its view of the votes on the change), so those are added to the test. Change-Id: Ia5b4b83096de3b8719c8b6d256e8e33749e7a5b8
-rw-r--r--tests/base.py7
-rw-r--r--tests/fixtures/config/zuultrigger/project-change-merged/git/common-config/zuul.yaml4
-rw-r--r--tests/unit/test_serial.py9
-rw-r--r--tests/unit/test_zuultrigger.py6
4 files changed, 16 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/tests/base.py b/tests/base.py
index cd8c0c780..4a4e536a3 100644
--- a/tests/base.py
+++ b/tests/base.py
@@ -638,8 +638,11 @@ class FakeGerritChange(object):
path = os.path.join(self.upstream_root, self.project)
repo = git.Repo(path)
- repo.heads[self.branch].commit = \
- repo.commit(self.patchsets[-1]['revision'])
+
+ repo.head.reference = self.branch
+ zuul.merger.merger.reset_repo_to_head(repo)
+ repo.git.merge('-s', 'resolve', self.patchsets[-1]['ref'])
+ repo.heads[self.branch].commit = repo.head.commit
def setReported(self):
self.reported += 1
diff --git a/tests/fixtures/config/zuultrigger/project-change-merged/git/common-config/zuul.yaml b/tests/fixtures/config/zuultrigger/project-change-merged/git/common-config/zuul.yaml
index 045e0a988..77a96c25b 100644
--- a/tests/fixtures/config/zuultrigger/project-change-merged/git/common-config/zuul.yaml
+++ b/tests/fixtures/config/zuultrigger/project-change-merged/git/common-config/zuul.yaml
@@ -36,6 +36,10 @@
name: merge-check
manager: independent
ignore-dependencies: true
+ reject:
+ gerrit:
+ approval:
+ - Verified: -1
trigger:
zuul:
- event: project-change-merged
diff --git a/tests/unit/test_serial.py b/tests/unit/test_serial.py
index 458d860db..f91bb4eda 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test_serial.py
+++ b/tests/unit/test_serial.py
@@ -26,14 +26,7 @@ class TestSerial(ZuulTestCase):
A.setMerged()
self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(A.getChangeMergedEvent())
self.waitUntilSettled()
- # The gerrit upstream repo simulation isn't perfect -- when
- # change A is merged above, the master ref is updated to point
- # to that change, it doesn't actually "merge" it. The same is
- # true for B, so if it didn't have A in its git history, then
- # A would not appear in the jobs run for B. We simulate the
- # correct situation by setting A as the git parent of B.
- B = self.fake_gerrit.addFakeChange('org/project', 'master', 'B',
- parent='refs/changes/1/1/1')
+ B = self.fake_gerrit.addFakeChange('org/project', 'master', 'B')
B.setMerged()
self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(B.getChangeMergedEvent())
self.waitUntilSettled()
diff --git a/tests/unit/test_zuultrigger.py b/tests/unit/test_zuultrigger.py
index 80cb7387c..aeda12433 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test_zuultrigger.py
+++ b/tests/unit/test_zuultrigger.py
@@ -220,6 +220,12 @@ class TestZuulTriggerProjectChangeMerged(ZuulTestCase):
self.assertTrue("project:{org/project} status:open" in
self.fake_gerrit.queries)
+ # Ensure the gerrit driver has updated its cache after the
+ # previous comments were left:
+ self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(A.getChangeCommentEvent(2))
+ self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(B.getChangeCommentEvent(2))
+ self.waitUntilSettled()
+
# Reconfigure and run the test again. This is a regression
# check to make sure that we don't end up with a stale trigger
# cache that has references to projects from the old