From 73a6e112a5395c28b22126a205ce3f9ed17739ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 14:37:20 -0800 Subject: datapath: conntrack: mark expected switch fall-through Upstream commit: commit 279badc2a85be83e0187b8c566e3b476b76a87a2 Author: Gustavo A. R. Silva Date: Thu Oct 19 12:55:03 2017 -0500 openvswitch: conntrack: mark expected switch fall-through In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case I placed a "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Acked-by: Yi-Hung Wei Signed-off-by: Greg Rose Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff --- datapath/conntrack.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/datapath/conntrack.c b/datapath/conntrack.c index b7eb53f93..5b4d6cce0 100644 --- a/datapath/conntrack.c +++ b/datapath/conntrack.c @@ -844,6 +844,7 @@ static int ovs_ct_nat_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct, } } /* Non-ICMP, fall thru to initialize if needed. */ + /* fall through */ case IP_CT_NEW: /* Seen it before? This can happen for loopback, retrans, * or local packets. -- cgit v1.2.1