From 97873af3734a9300f5eb29f664513edc839cf88a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Jarry Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:15:25 +0200 Subject: Documentation: Use new syntax for dpdk port representors. Since DPDK 21.05, the representor identifier now handles a relative VF offset. The legacy representor ID seems only valid in certain cases (first dpdk port). Link: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/cebf7f17159a8 Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets --- lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'lib/netdev-dpdk.c') diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c index 0dd655507..d2eeb22ae 100644 --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c @@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ static dpdk_port_t netdev_dpdk_get_port_by_devargs(const char *devargs) } /* - * Normally, a PCI id (optionally followed by a representor number) + * Normally, a PCI id (optionally followed by a representor identifier) * is enough for identifying a specific DPDK port. * However, for some NICs having multiple ports sharing the same PCI * id, using PCI id won't work then. -- cgit v1.2.1