| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test keeps occasionally failing in CI - as expected, because
we retry 8 times for an object but it's completely possible for
us to hit the <0.5% chance of 50% failure 8 times in a row.
Since the max errors from the server is 100, set retries to the
same thing.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Skip tests or run them without GPG-related functionality if GPGME
wasn't enabled in a build time.
Signed-off-by: Denis Pynkin <denis.pynkin@collabora.com>
Closes: #1889
Approved by: cgwalters
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This runs a test involving many retries for the --network-retries
option directly rather than inside a conditional statement, so that
the command does not silently fail and allow the test to continue
running.
Closes: #1673
Approved by: jlebon
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This exposes a way to specify from the command line the number
of times to retry each download after a network error. If a negative
value is given, then the default number of retries (5) is used. If 0
is given, then errors are returned without retrying.
closes #1659
Closes: #1669
Approved by: jlebon
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extend test-pull-repeated.sh to test error 408 as well as error 500, to
ensure that the new retry-on-network-timeout code in ostree-repo-pull.c
correctly retries.
Rather than the 200 iterations needed for the error 500 tests, only do 5
iterations. The pull code internally does 5 retries (by default), which
means a full iteration count of 25. That seems to be sufficient to make
the tests reliably pass, in my testing — we can always bump it up to 200
/ 5 = 40 in future if needed (to put it in parity with the error 500
tests).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Closes: #1594
Approved by: jlebon
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SPDX License List is a list of (common) open source
licenses that can be referred to by a “short identifier”.
It has several advantages compared to the common "license header texts"
usually found in source files.
Some of the advantages:
* It is precise; there is no ambiguity due to variations in license header
text
* It is language neutral
* It is easy to machine process
* It is concise
* It is simple and can be used without much cost in interpreted
environments like java Script, etc.
* An SPDX license identifier is immutable.
* It provides simple guidance for developers who want to make sure the
license for their code is respected
See http://spdx.org for further reading.
Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Closes: #1439
Approved by: cgwalters
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In almost all places. There are just a few exceptions; one tricky bit for
example is that the repo config must still have `mode=archive-z2`, since
`archive` used to mean something else. (We could very likely just get rid of
that check, but eh, later).
I also added a test that one can still do `ostree repo init --mode=archive-z2`.
Closes: #1125
Approved by: jlebon
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are a lot of things suboptimal about this approach, but
on the other hand we need to get our CI back up and running.
The basic approach is to - in the test suite, detect if we're on overlayfs. If
so, set a flag in the repo, which gets picked up by a few strategic places in
the core to turn on "ignore xattrs".
I also had to add a variant of this for the sysroot work.
The core problem here is while overlayfs will let us read and
see the SELinux labels, it won't let us write them.
Down the line, we should improve this so that we can selectively ignore e.g.
`security.*` attributes but not `user.*` say.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/758
Closes: #759
Approved by: jlebon
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
libcurl AFAICS doesn't have an API to convert HTTP code :arrow_right: error
string, so let's make the test regexp operate on both.
Closes: #651
Approved by: giuseppe
|
|
|
Systems like pulp may want to keep retrying in a loop if the server
throws a (hopefully transient) 500, and we need test coverage of
handling these errors versus our existing 404 and 206 coverage.
Closes: #383
Approved by: mbarnes
|
