From f4868084a55e3abd0b45ee2fb7b477e038a81d1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Behdad Esfahbod Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:47:08 -0400 Subject: [HB] Bitfield packing *is* very delicate Fix the second instance. --- pango/opentype/hb-buffer.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pango/opentype/hb-buffer.h b/pango/opentype/hb-buffer.h index f06a255a..f27739f6 100644 --- a/pango/opentype/hb-buffer.h +++ b/pango/opentype/hb-buffer.h @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ typedef struct _hb_glyph_position_t { hb_position_t x_advance; hb_position_t y_advance; /* XXX these should all be replaced by "uint32_t internal" */ - hb_bool_t new_advance :1; /* if set, the advance width values are + unsigned short new_advance :1; /* if set, the advance width values are absolute, i.e., they won't be added to the original glyph's value but rather replace them */ -- cgit v1.2.1