summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRicardo Signes <rjbs@cpan.org>2010-04-17 14:34:28 -0400
committerRicardo Signes <rjbs@cpan.org>2010-04-19 12:26:33 -0400
commita3d78747dc6076a86b29e59f911247652002f29b (patch)
tree800177d5aaf6579c854c5aee426551514a307dfe
parente05a0d7494b04196ac0b6dbeb026a51df2a2a73d (diff)
downloadperl-a3d78747dc6076a86b29e59f911247652002f29b.tar.gz
clarification of multi-bracket format
-rw-r--r--pod/perlpod.pod10
-rw-r--r--pod/perlpodspec.pod12
2 files changed, 20 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/pod/perlpod.pod b/pod/perlpod.pod
index 826dea54dc..415d13c0d8 100644
--- a/pod/perlpod.pod
+++ b/pod/perlpod.pod
@@ -558,8 +558,8 @@ This will produce: "C<$a E<lt>=E<gt> $b>"
A more readable, and perhaps more "plain" way is to use an alternate
set of delimiters that doesn't require a single ">" to be escaped. With
-the Pod formatters that are standard starting with perl5.5.660, doubled
-angle brackets ("<<" and ">>") may be used I<if and only if there is
+the Pod formatters that are standard starting with perl5.5.660 (circa 2000),
+doubled angle brackets ("<<" and ">>") may be used I<if and only if there is
whitespace right after the opening delimiter and whitespace right
before the closing delimiter!> For example, the following will
do the trick:
@@ -582,6 +582,12 @@ And they all mean exactly the same as this:
C<$a E<lt>=E<gt> $b>
+The multiple-bracket form does not affect the interpretation of the contents of
+the formatting code, only how it must end. That means that the examples above
+are also exactly the same as this:
+
+ C<< $a E<lt>=E<gt> $b >>
+
As a further example, this means that if you wanted to put these bits of
code in C<C> (code) style:
diff --git a/pod/perlpodspec.pod b/pod/perlpodspec.pod
index b7c3122f02..0bf84e0910 100644
--- a/pod/perlpodspec.pod
+++ b/pod/perlpodspec.pod
@@ -429,6 +429,18 @@ themselves. That is, these are all synonymous:
and so on.
+Finally, the multiple-angle-bracket form does I<not> alter the interpretation
+of nested formatting codes, meaning that the following four example lines are
+identical in meaning:
+
+ B<example: C<$a E<lt>=E<gt> $b>>
+
+ B<example: C<< $a <=> $b >>>
+
+ B<example: C<< $a E<lt>=E<gt> $b >>>
+
+ B<<< example: C<< $a E<lt>=E<gt> $b >> >>>
+
=back
In parsing Pod, a notably tricky part is the correct parsing of