diff options
author | Karl Williamson <khw@cpan.org> | 2020-01-15 05:07:10 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Karl Williamson <khw@cpan.org> | 2020-01-19 09:57:31 -0700 |
commit | 17d6187b6af20688dcba5e3c84165e99d9c4c1ce (patch) | |
tree | 57ba8ceedd2611028e20a5f91a7427b94f8e28da /numeric.c | |
parent | 3f8c4d7479702f0eb269a85fecd74f47120b00f0 (diff) | |
download | perl-17d6187b6af20688dcba5e3c84165e99d9c4c1ce.tar.gz |
numeric.c: White-space only
Indent code that the previous commit added an enclosing block
surrounding it.
And vertically align some comments
Diffstat (limited to 'numeric.c')
-rw-r--r-- | numeric.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 20 deletions
@@ -535,24 +535,24 @@ Perl_grok_bin_oct_hex(pTHX_ const char *start, if (*s) { if ( ! (input_flags & PERL_SCAN_SILENT_ILLDIGIT) - && ckWARN(WARN_DIGIT)) - { - if (base != 8) { - Perl_warner(aTHX_ packWARN(WARN_DIGIT), - "Illegal %s digit '%c' ignored", - ((base == 2) - ? "binary" - : "hexadecimal"), - *s); - } - else if (isDIGIT(*s)) { /* octal base */ - - /* Allow \octal to work the DWIM way (that is, stop scanning as - * soon as non-octal characters are seen, complain only if - * someone seems to want to use the digits eight and nine. - * Since we know it is not octal, then if isDIGIT, must be an 8 - * or 9). */ - Perl_warner(aTHX_ packWARN(WARN_DIGIT), + && ckWARN(WARN_DIGIT)) + { + if (base != 8) { + Perl_warner(aTHX_ packWARN(WARN_DIGIT), + "Illegal %s digit '%c' ignored", + ((base == 2) + ? "binary" + : "hexadecimal"), + *s); + } + else if (isDIGIT(*s)) { /* octal base */ + + /* Allow \octal to work the DWIM way (that is, stop + * scanning as soon as non-octal characters are seen, + * complain only if someone seems to want to use the digits + * eight and nine. Since we know it is not octal, then if + * isDIGIT, must be an 8 or 9). */ + Perl_warner(aTHX_ packWARN(WARN_DIGIT), "Illegal octal digit '%c' ignored", *s); } } @@ -1044,8 +1044,8 @@ Perl_grok_number_flags(pTHX_ const char *pv, STRLEN len, UV *valuep, U32 flags) * belong in a number at all (unless it's a radix character in a weird * locale). Given this, it's far more likely to be a minus than the * others. (On EBCDIC it is one of 42, 44, 46, 48, 4A, 4C, 4E, (not 40 - * because can't be a space) 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 6A, 6C, 6E. Again, only - * potentially a weird radix character, or 4E='+', or 60='-') */ + * because can't be a space) 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 6A, 6C, 6E. Again, + * only potentially a weird radix character, or 4E='+', or 60='-') */ if (LIKELY(*s == '-')) { s++; numtype = IS_NUMBER_NEG; |