Change the push/unshift warning (#9532) to talk about "no values"

instead of "no arguments".

p4raw-id: //depot/perl@9534

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/pod/perldiag.pod b/pod/perldiag.pod
index 16b4ec2adc..038b93fe59 100644
--- a/pod/perldiag.pod
+++ b/pod/perldiag.pod
@@ -3682,6 +3682,15 @@ L<perlref> for more on this.
 
 (W) You did C<use re;> without any arguments.   That isn't very useful.
 
+=item Useless use of %s with no values
+
+(W misc) You used the push() or unshift() function with no arguments
+apart from the array, like C<push(@x)> or C<unshift(@foo)>. That won't
+usually have any effect on the array, so is completely useless. It's
+possible in principle that push(@tied_array) could have some effect
+if the array is tied to a class which implements a PUSH method. If so,
+you can write it as C<push(@tied_array,())> to avoid this warning.
+
 =item "use" not allowed in expression
 
 (F) The "use" keyword is recognized and executed at compile time, and
@@ -3949,15 +3958,6 @@ which means that Perl 5 will try to call the subroutine when the
 assignment is executed, which is probably not what you want.  (If it IS
 what you want, put an & in front.)
 
-=item Useless use of %s with no arguments
-
-(W misc) You used the push() or unshift() function with no arguments
-apart from the array, like C<push(@x)> or C<unshift(@foo)>. That won't
-usually have any effect on the array, so is completely useless. It's
-possible in principle that push(@tied_array) could have some effect
-if the array is tied to a class which implements a PUSH method. If so,
-you can write it as C<push(@tied_array,())> to avoid this warning.
-
 =back
 
 =cut