diff options
author | Tom Christiansen <tchrist@perl.com> | 1999-01-07 16:05:02 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> | 1999-01-08 11:51:52 +0000 |
commit | 65acb1b1d672587d3a0d073613a475584830e38e (patch) | |
tree | fcb09719fada1c9453493712a798b889dd89b086 /pod/perlfaq4.pod | |
parent | ae83f3772b2dd371e676035c6714025e89d7e08f (diff) | |
download | perl-65acb1b1d672587d3a0d073613a475584830e38e.tar.gz |
FAQ jumbo patch from tchrist.
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20229@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20231@jhereg.perl.com>
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq1.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20233@jhereg.perl.com>
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq2.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20235@jhereg.perl.com>
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq3.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20237@jhereg.perl.com>
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq4.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20239@jhereg.perl.com>
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq5.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20241@jhereg.perl.com>
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq6.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20243@jhereg.perl.com>
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq7.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:03 -0700
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20245@jhereg.perl.com>
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq8.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:03 -0700
Message-Id: <199901080605.XAA20257@jhereg.perl.com>
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
To: pumpkings@jhereg.perl.com
Subject: newest version of perlfaq9.pod
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:05:03 -0700
p4raw-id: //depot/cfgperl@2588
Diffstat (limited to 'pod/perlfaq4.pod')
-rw-r--r-- | pod/perlfaq4.pod | 449 |
1 files changed, 383 insertions, 66 deletions
diff --git a/pod/perlfaq4.pod b/pod/perlfaq4.pod index 39325c2f69..c477b9d4c6 100644 --- a/pod/perlfaq4.pod +++ b/pod/perlfaq4.pod @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ =head1 NAME -perlfaq4 - Data Manipulation ($Revision: 1.26 $, $Date: 1998/08/05 12:04:00 $) +perlfaq4 - Data Manipulation ($Revision: 1.40 $, $Date: 1999/01/08 04:26:39 $) =head1 DESCRIPTION @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ are consequently slower. To get rid of the superfluous digits, just use a format (eg, C<printf("%.2f", 19.95)>) to get the required precision. -See L<perlop/"Floating-point Arithmetic">. +See L<perlop/"Floating-point Arithmetic">. =head2 Why isn't my octal data interpreted correctly? @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ umask(), or sysopen(), which all want permissions in octal. chmod(644, $file); # WRONG -- perl -w catches this chmod(0644, $file); # right -=head2 Does perl have a round function? What about ceil() and floor()? Trig functions? +=head2 Does Perl have a round() function? What about ceil() and floor()? Trig functions? Remember that int() merely truncates toward 0. For rounding to a certain number of digits, sprintf() or printf() is usually the easiest @@ -88,6 +88,19 @@ cases, it probably pays not to trust whichever system rounding is being used by Perl, but to instead implement the rounding function you need yourself. +To see why, notice how you'll still have an issue on half-way-point +alternation: + + for ($i = 0; $i < 1.01; $i += 0.05) { printf "%.1f ",$i} + + 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 + 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 + +Don't blame Perl. It's the same as in C. IEEE says we have to do this. +Perl numbers whose absolute values are integers under 2**31 (on 32 bit +machines) will work pretty much like mathematical integers. Other numbers +are not guaranteed. + =head2 How do I convert bits into ints? To turn a string of 1s and 0s like C<10110110> into a scalar containing @@ -100,6 +113,33 @@ Here's an example of going the other way: $binary_string = join('', unpack('B*', "\x29")); +=head2 Why doesn't & work the way I want it to? + +The behavior of binary arithmetic operators depends on whether they're +used on numbers or strings. The operators treat a string as a series +of bits and work with that (the string C<"3"> is the bit pattern +C<00110011>). The operators work with the binary form of a number +(the number C<3> is treated as the bit pattern C<00000011>). + +So, saying C<11 & 3> performs the "and" operation on numbers (yielding +C<1>). Saying C<"11" & "3"> performs the "and" operation on strings +(yielding C<"1">). + +Most problems with C<&> and C<|> arise because the programmer thinks +they have a number but really it's a string. The rest arise because +the programmer says: + + if ("\020\020" & "\101\101") { + # ... + } + +but a string consisting of two null bytes (the result of C<"\020\020" +& "\101\101">) is not a false value in Perl. You need: + + if ( ("\020\020" & "\101\101") !~ /[^\000]/) { + # ... + } + =head2 How do I multiply matrices? Use the Math::Matrix or Math::MatrixReal modules (available from CPAN) @@ -120,12 +160,12 @@ To call a function on each element of an array, but ignore the results: foreach $iterator (@array) { - &my_func($iterator); + some_func($iterator); } To call a function on each integer in a (small) range, you B<can> use: - @results = map { &my_func($_) } (5 .. 25); + @results = map { some_func($_) } (5 .. 25); but you should be aware that the C<..> operator creates an array of all integers in the range. This can take a lot of memory for large @@ -133,7 +173,7 @@ ranges. Instead use: @results = (); for ($i=5; $i < 500_005; $i++) { - push(@results, &my_func($i)); + push(@results, some_func($i)); } =head2 How can I output Roman numerals? @@ -142,20 +182,25 @@ Get the http://www.perl.com/CPAN/modules/by-module/Roman module. =head2 Why aren't my random numbers random? -The short explanation is that you're getting pseudorandom numbers, not -random ones, because computers are good at being predictable and bad -at being random (despite appearances caused by bugs in your programs -:-). A longer explanation is available on -http://www.perl.com/CPAN/doc/FMTEYEWTK/random, courtesy of Tom -Phoenix. John von Neumann said, ``Anyone who attempts to generate -random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state -of sin.'' +If you're using a version of Perl before 5.004, you must call C<srand> +once at the start of your program to seed the random number generator. +5.004 and later automatically call C<srand> at the beginning. Don't +call C<srand> more than once--you make your numbers less random, rather +than more. -You should also check out the Math::TrulyRandom module from CPAN. It -uses the imperfections in your system's timer to generate random -numbers, but this takes quite a while. If you want a better +Computers are good at being predictable and bad at being random +(despite appearances caused by bugs in your programs :-). +http://www.perl.com/CPAN/doc/FMTEYEWTK/random, courtesy of Tom +Phoenix, talks more about this.. John von Neumann said, ``Anyone who +attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of +course, living in a state of sin.'' + +If you want numbers that are more random than C<rand> with C<srand> +provides, you should also check out the Math::TrulyRandom module from +CPAN. It uses the imperfections in your system's timer to generate +random numbers, but this takes quite a while. If you want a better pseudorandom generator than comes with your operating system, look at -``Numerical Recipes in C'' at http://nr.harvard.edu/nr/bookc.html . +``Numerical Recipes in C'' at http://www.nr.com/ . =head1 Data: Dates @@ -178,10 +223,10 @@ You can find the week of the year by dividing this by 7: Of course, this believes that weeks start at zero. The Date::Calc module from CPAN has a lot of date calculation functions, including day of the year, week of the year, and so on. Note that not -all business consider ``week 1'' to be the same; for example, -American business often consider the first week with a Monday -in it to be Work Week #1, despite ISO 8601, which consider -WW1 to be the frist week with a Thursday in it. +all businesses consider ``week 1'' to be the same; for example, +American businesses often consider the first week with a Monday +in it to be Work Week #1, despite ISO 8601, which considers +WW1 to be the first week with a Thursday in it. =head2 How can I compare two dates and find the difference? @@ -204,20 +249,34 @@ there is an example of Julian date calculation that should help you in http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/David_Muir_Sharnoff/modules/Time/JulianDay.pm.gz . +=head2 How do I find yesterday's date? + +The C<time()> function returns the current time in seconds since the +epoch. Take one day off that: + + $yesterday = time() - ( 24 * 60 * 60 ); + +Then you can pass this to C<localtime()> and get the individual year, +month, day, hour, minute, seconds values. + =head2 Does Perl have a year 2000 problem? Is Perl Y2K compliant? -Short answer: No, Perl does not have a Year 2000 problem. Yes, -Perl is Y2K compliant. The programmers you've hired to use it, -however, probably are not. +Short answer: No, Perl does not have a Year 2000 problem. Yes, Perl is +Y2K compliant (whatever that means). The programmers you've hired to +use it, however, probably are not. + +Long answer: The question belies a true understanding of the issue. +Perl is just as Y2K compliant as your pencil--no more, and no less. +Can you use your pencil to write a non-Y2K-compliant memo? Of course +you can. Is that the pencil's fault? Of course it isn't. -Long answer: Perl is just as Y2K compliant as your pencil--no more, -and no less. The date and time functions supplied with perl (gmtime -and localtime) supply adequate information to determine the year well -beyond 2000 (2038 is when trouble strikes for 32-bit machines). The -year returned by these functions when used in an array context is the -year minus 1900. For years between 1910 and 1999 this I<happens> to -be a 2-digit decimal number. To avoid the year 2000 problem simply do -not treat the year as a 2-digit number. It isn't. +The date and time functions supplied with perl (gmtime and localtime) +supply adequate information to determine the year well beyond 2000 +(2038 is when trouble strikes for 32-bit machines). The year returned +by these functions when used in an array context is the year minus 1900. +For years between 1910 and 1999 this I<happens> to be a 2-digit decimal +number. To avoid the year 2000 problem simply do not treat the year as +a 2-digit number. It isn't. When gmtime() and localtime() are used in scalar context they return a timestamp string that contains a fully-expanded year. For example, @@ -286,8 +345,9 @@ parser. If you are serious about writing a parser, there are a number of modules or oddities that will make your life a lot easier. There is the CPAN module Parse::RecDescent, the standard module Text::Balanced, -the byacc program, and Mark-Jason Dominus's excellent I<py> tool at -http://www.plover.com/~mjd/perl/py/ . +the byacc program, the CPAN module Parse::Yapp, and Mark-Jason +Dominus's excellent I<py> tool at http://www.plover.com/~mjd/perl/py/ +. One simple destructive, inside-out approach that you might try is to pull out the smallest nesting parts one at a time: @@ -296,6 +356,21 @@ pull out the smallest nesting parts one at a time: # do something with $1 } +A more complicated and sneaky approach is to make Perl's regular +expression engine do it for you. This is courtesy Dean Inada, and +rather has the nature of an Obfuscated Perl Contest entry, but it +really does work: + + # $_ contains the string to parse + # BEGIN and END are the opening and closing markers for the + # nested text. + + @( = ('(',''); + @) = (')',''); + ($re=$_)=~s/((BEGIN)|(END)|.)/$)[!$3]\Q$1\E$([!$2]/gs; + @$ = (eval{/$re/},$@!~/unmatched/); + print join("\n",@$[0..$#$]) if( $$[-1] ); + =head2 How do I reverse a string? Use reverse() in scalar context, as documented in @@ -422,6 +497,11 @@ You can (and probably should) enable locale awareness of those characters by placing a C<use locale> pragma in your program. See L<perllocale> for endless details on locales. +This is sometimes referred to as putting something into "title +case", but that's not quite accurate. Consdier the proper +capitalization of the movie I<Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to +Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb>, for example. + =head2 How can I split a [character] delimited string except when inside [character]? (Comma-separated files) @@ -457,13 +537,15 @@ distribution) lets you say: use Text::ParseWords; @new = quotewords(",", 0, $text); +There's also a Text::CSV module on CPAN. + =head2 How do I strip blank space from the beginning/end of a string? Although the simplest approach would seem to be: $string =~ s/^\s*(.*?)\s*$/$1/; -This is unneccesarily slow, destructive, and fails with embedded newlines. +This is unnecessarily slow, destructive, and fails with embedded newlines. It is much better faster to do this in two steps: $string =~ s/^\s+//; @@ -488,6 +570,44 @@ values of a hash if you use a slide: s/\s+$//; } +=head2 How do I pad a string with blanks or pad a number with zeroes? + +(This answer contributed by Uri Guttman) + +In the following examples, C<$pad_len> is the length to which you wish +to pad the string, C<$text> or C<$num> contains the string to be +padded, and C<$pad_char> contains the padding character. You can use a +single character string constant instead of the C<$pad_char> variable +if you know what it is in advance. + +The simplest method use the C<sprintf> function. It can pad on the +left or right with blanks and on the left with zeroes. + + # Left padding with blank: + $padded = sprintf( "%${pad_len}s", $text ) ; + + # Right padding with blank: + $padded = sprintf( "%${pad_len}s", $text ) ; + + # Left padding with 0: + $padded = sprintf( "%0${pad_len}d", $num ) ; + +If you need to pad with a character other than blank or zero you can use +one of the following methods. + +These methods generate a pad string with the C<x> operator and +concatenate that with the original text. + +Left and right padding with any character: + + $padded = $pad_char x ( $pad_len - length( $text ) ) . $text ; + $padded = $text . $pad_char x ( $pad_len - length( $text ) ) ; + +Or you can left or right pad $text directly: + + $text .= $pad_char x ( $pad_len - length( $text ) ) ; + substr( $text, 0, 0 ) = $pad_char x ( $pad_len - length( $text ) ) ; + =head2 How do I extract selected columns from a string? Use substr() or unpack(), both documented in L<perlfunc>. @@ -523,13 +643,13 @@ Let's assume that you have a string like: If those were both global variables, then this would suffice: - $text =~ s/\$(\w+)/${$1}/g; + $text =~ s/\$(\w+)/${$1}/g; # no /e needed But since they are probably lexicals, or at least, they could be, you'd have to do this: $text =~ s/(\$\w+)/$1/eeg; - die if $@; # needed on /ee, not /e + die if $@; # needed /ee, not /e It's probably better in the general case to treat those variables as entries in some special hash. For example: @@ -547,7 +667,9 @@ of the FAQ. The problem is that those double-quotes force stringification, coercing numbers and references into strings, even when you -don't want them to be. +don't want them to be. Think of it this way: double-quote +expansion is used to produce new strings. If you already +have a string, why do you need more? If you get used to writing odd things like these: @@ -583,7 +705,7 @@ Stringification also destroys arrays. print "@lines"; # WRONG - extra blanks print @lines; # right -=head2 Why don't my <<HERE documents work? +=head2 Why don't my E<lt>E<lt>HERE documents work? Check for these three things: @@ -665,6 +787,27 @@ indentation correctly preserved: =head1 Data: Arrays +=head2 What is the difference between a list and an array? + +An array has a changeable length. A list does not. An array is something +you can push or pop, while a list is a set of values. Some people make +the distinction that a list is a value while an array is a variable. +Subroutines are passed and return lists, you put things into list +context, you initialize arrays with lists, and you foreach() across +a list. C<@> variables are arrays, anonymous arrays are arrays, arrays +in scalar context behave like the number of elements in them, subroutines +access their arguments through the array C<@_>, push/pop/shift only work +on arrays. + +As a side note, there's no such thing as a list in scalar context. +When you say + + $scalar = (2, 5, 7, 9); + +you're using the comma operator in scalar context, so it evaluates the +left hand side, then evaluates and returns the left hand side. This +causes the last value to be returned: 9. + =head2 What is the difference between $array[1] and @array[1]? The former is a scalar value, the latter an array slice, which makes @@ -724,6 +867,8 @@ nice in that it won't work with false values like undef, 0, or ""; =back +But perhaps you should have been using a hash all along, eh? + =head2 How can I tell whether a list or array contains a certain element? Hearing the word "in" is an I<in>dication that you probably should have @@ -770,7 +915,17 @@ or worse yet These are slow (checks every element even if the first matches), inefficient (same reason), and potentially buggy (what if there are -regexp characters in $whatever?). +regexp characters in $whatever?). If you're only testing once, then +use: + + $is_there = 0; + foreach $elt (@array) { + if ($elt eq $elt_to_find) { + $is_there = 1; + last; + } + } + if ($is_there) { ... } =head2 How do I compute the difference of two arrays? How do I compute the intersection of two arrays? @@ -785,11 +940,60 @@ each element is unique in a given array: push @{ $count{$element} > 1 ? \@intersection : \@difference }, $element; } +=head2 How do I test whether two arrays or hashes are equal? + +The following code works for single-level arrays. It uses a stringwise +comparison, and does not distinguish defined versus undefined empty +strings. Modify if you have other needs. + + $are_equal = compare_arrays(\@frogs, \@toads); + + sub compare_arrays { + my ($first, $second) = @_; + local $^W = 0; # silence spurious -w undef complaints + return 0 unless @$first == @$second; + for (my $i = 0; $i < @$first; $i++) { + return 0 if $first->[$i] ne $second->[$i]; + } + return 1; + } + +For multilevel structures, you may wish to use an approach more +like this one. It uses the CPAN module FreezeThaw: + + use FreezeThaw qw(cmpStr); + @a = @b = ( "this", "that", [ "more", "stuff" ] ); + + printf "a and b contain %s arrays\n", + cmpStr(\@a, \@b) == 0 + ? "the same" + : "different"; + +This approach also works for comparing hashes. Here +we'll demonstrate two different answers: + + use FreezeThaw qw(cmpStr cmpStrHard); + + %a = %b = ( "this" => "that", "extra" => [ "more", "stuff" ] ); + $a{EXTRA} = \%b; + $b{EXTRA} = \%a; + + printf "a and b contain %s hashes\n", + cmpStr(\%a, \%b) == 0 ? "the same" : "different"; + + printf "a and b contain %s hashes\n", + cmpStrHard(\%a, \%b) == 0 ? "the same" : "different"; + + +The first reports that both those the hashes contain the same data, +while the second reports that they do not. Which you prefer is left as +an exercise to the reader. + =head2 How do I find the first array element for which a condition is true? You can use this if you care about the index: - for ($i=0; $i < @array; $i++) { + for ($i= 0; $i < @array; $i++) { if ($array[$i] eq "Waldo") { $found_index = $i; last; @@ -810,7 +1014,42 @@ need to copy pointers each time. If you really, really wanted, you could use structures as described in L<perldsc> or L<perltoot> and do just what the algorithm book tells you -to do. +to do. For example, imagine a list node like this: + + $node = { + VALUE => 42, + LINK => undef, + }; + +You could walk the list this way: + + print "List: "; + for ($node = $head; $node; $node = $node->{LINK}) { + print $node->{VALUE}, " "; + } + print "\n"; + +You could grow the list this way: + + my ($head, $tail); + $tail = append($head, 1); # grow a new head + for $value ( 2 .. 10 ) { + $tail = append($tail, $value); + } + + sub append { + my($list, $value) = @_; + my $node = { VALUE => $value }; + if ($list) { + $node->{LINK} = $list->{LINK}; + $list->{LINK} = $node; + } else { + $_[0] = $node; # replace caller's version + } + return $node; + } + +But again, Perl's built-in are virtually always good enough. =head2 How do I handle circular lists? @@ -1006,9 +1245,54 @@ get those bits into your @ints array: This method gets faster the more sparse the bit vector is. (Courtesy of Tim Bunce and Winfried Koenig.) +Here's a demo on how to use vec(): + + # vec demo + $vector = "\xff\x0f\xef\xfe"; + print "Ilya's string \\xff\\x0f\\xef\\xfe represents the number ", + unpack("N", $vector), "\n"; + $is_set = vec($vector, 23, 1); + print "Its 23rd bit is ", $is_set ? "set" : "clear", ".\n"; + pvec($vector); + + set_vec(1,1,1); + set_vec(3,1,1); + set_vec(23,1,1); + + set_vec(3,1,3); + set_vec(3,2,3); + set_vec(3,4,3); + set_vec(3,4,7); + set_vec(3,8,3); + set_vec(3,8,7); + + set_vec(0,32,17); + set_vec(1,32,17); + + sub set_vec { + my ($offset, $width, $value) = @_; + my $vector = ''; + vec($vector, $offset, $width) = $value; + print "offset=$offset width=$width value=$value\n"; + pvec($vector); + } + + sub pvec { + my $vector = shift; + my $bits = unpack("b*", $vector); + my $i = 0; + my $BASE = 8; + + print "vector length in bytes: ", length($vector), "\n"; + @bytes = unpack("A8" x length($vector), $bits); + print "bits are: @bytes\n\n"; + } + =head2 Why does defined() return true on empty arrays and hashes? -See L<perlfunc/defined> in the 5.004 release or later of Perl. +The short story is that you should probably only use defined on scalars or +functions, not on aggregates (arrays and hashes). See L<perlfunc/defined> +in the 5.004 release or later of Perl for more detail. =head1 Data: Hashes (Associative Arrays) @@ -1243,9 +1527,21 @@ awk's behavior. =head2 How can I make the Perl equivalent of a C structure/C++ class/hash or array of hashes or arrays? -Use references (documented in L<perlref>). Examples of complex data -structures are given in L<perldsc> and L<perllol>. Examples of -structures and object-oriented classes are in L<perltoot>. +Usually a hash ref, perhaps like this: + + $record = { + NAME => "Jason", + EMPNO => 132, + TITLE => "deputy peon", + AGE => 23, + SALARY => 37_000, + PALS => [ "Norbert", "Rhys", "Phineas"], + }; + +References are documented in L<perlref> and the upcoming L<perlreftut>. +Examples of complex data structures are given in L<perldsc> and +L<perllol>. Examples of structures and object-oriented classes are +in L<perltoot>. =head2 How can I use a reference as a hash key? @@ -1263,8 +1559,9 @@ this works fine (assuming the files are found): print "Your kernel is GNU-zip enabled!\n"; } -On some systems, however, you have to play tedious games with "text" -versus "binary" files. See L<perlfunc/"binmode">. +On some legacy systems, however, you have to play tedious games with +"text" versus "binary" files. See L<perlfunc/"binmode">, or the upcoming +L<perlopentut> manpage. If you're concerned about 8-bit ASCII data, then see L<perllocale>. @@ -1276,14 +1573,14 @@ some gotchas. See the section on Regular Expressions. Assuming that you don't care about IEEE notations like "NaN" or "Infinity", you probably just want to use a regular expression. - warn "has nondigits" if /\D/; - warn "not a natural number" unless /^\d+$/; # rejects -3 - warn "not an integer" unless /^-?\d+$/; # rejects +3 - warn "not an integer" unless /^[+-]?\d+$/; - warn "not a decimal number" unless /^-?\d+\.?\d*$/; # rejects .2 - warn "not a decimal number" unless /^-?(?:\d+(?:\.\d*)?|\.\d+)$/; - warn "not a C float" - unless /^([+-]?)(?=\d|\.\d)\d*(\.\d*)?([Ee]([+-]?\d+))?$/; + if (/\D/) { print "has nondigits\n" } + if (/^\d+$/) { print "is a whole number\n" } + if (/^-?\d+$/) { print "is an integer\n" } + if (/^[+-]?\d+$/) { print "is a +/- integer\n" } + if (/^-?\d+\.?\d*$/) { print "is a real number\n" } + if (/^-?(?:\d+(?:\.\d*)?|\.\d+)$/) { print "is a decimal number" } + if (/^([+-]?)(?=\d|\.\d)\d*(\.\d*)?([Ee]([+-]?\d+))?$/) + { print "a C float" } If you're on a POSIX system, Perl's supports the C<POSIX::strtod> function. Its semantics are somewhat cumbersome, so here's a C<getnum> @@ -1317,19 +1614,32 @@ and longs, respectively. =head2 How do I keep persistent data across program calls? For some specific applications, you can use one of the DBM modules. -See L<AnyDBM_File>. More generically, you should consult the -FreezeThaw, Storable, or Class::Eroot modules from CPAN. +See L<AnyDBM_File>. More generically, you should consult the FreezeThaw, +Storable, or Class::Eroot modules from CPAN. Here's one example using +Storable's C<store> and C<retrieve> functions: + + use Storable; + store(\%hash, "filename"); + + # later on... + $href = retrieve("filename"); # by ref + %hash = %{ retrieve("filename") }; # direct to hash =head2 How do I print out or copy a recursive data structure? -The Data::Dumper module on CPAN is nice for printing out -data structures, and FreezeThaw for copying them. For example: +The Data::Dumper module on CPAN (or the 5.005 release of Perl) is great +for printing out data structures. The Storable module, found on CPAN, +provides a function called C<dclone> that recursively copies its argument. + + use Storable qw(dclone); + $r2 = dclone($r1); - use FreezeThaw qw(freeze thaw); - ($new) = thaw freeze $old; +Where $r1 can be a reference to any kind of data structure you'd like. +It will be deeply copied. Because C<dclone> takes and returns references, +you'd have to add extra punctuation if you had a hash of arrays that +you wanted to copy. -Where $old can be (a reference to) any kind of data structure you'd like. -It will be deeply copied. + %newhash = %{ dclone(\%oldhash) }; =head2 How do I define methods for every class/object? @@ -1339,9 +1649,15 @@ Use the UNIVERSAL class (see L<UNIVERSAL>). Get the Business::CreditCard module from CPAN. +=head2 How do I pack arrays of doubles or floats for XS code? + +The kgbpack.c code in the PGPLOT module on CPAN does just this. +If you're doing a lot of float or double processing, consider using +the PDL module from CPAN instead--it makes number-crunching easy. + =head1 AUTHOR AND COPYRIGHT -Copyright (c) 1997, 1998 Tom Christiansen and Nathan Torkington. +Copyright (c) 1997-1999 Tom Christiansen and Nathan Torkington. All rights reserved. When included as part of the Standard Version of Perl, or as part of @@ -1356,3 +1672,4 @@ are hereby placed into the public domain. You are permitted and encouraged to use this code in your own programs for fun or for profit as you see fit. A simple comment in the code giving credit would be courteous but is not required. + |