summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pod/perlhack.pod
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPhilip Newton <pne@cpan.org>2001-11-24 22:24:00 +0100
committerJarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi>2001-11-24 20:09:20 +0000
commit9d077eaaaaf5479060d3eabcfb6d60f086ba857a (patch)
treef0d5377c72e9ecc2a380f1bba34eb8a263d88ddd /pod/perlhack.pod
parentd6ec9fa3b3319f35131489112ca8c41e368dd1c8 (diff)
downloadperl-9d077eaaaaf5479060d3eabcfb6d60f086ba857a.tar.gz
Re: [PATCH] Tests are good
Message-ID: <4c000us22s27871hrsqnvjmtnvtd4r85u1@4ax.com> p4raw-id: //depot/perl@13245
Diffstat (limited to 'pod/perlhack.pod')
-rw-r--r--pod/perlhack.pod2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/pod/perlhack.pod b/pod/perlhack.pod
index 371b6b5f72..1f69c969ee 100644
--- a/pod/perlhack.pod
+++ b/pod/perlhack.pod
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ must include regression tests to verify that everything works as expected.
Without tests provided by the original author, how can anyone else changing
perl in the future be sure that they haven't unwittingly broken the behaviour
the patch implements? And without tests, how can the patch's author be
-confident that his/her hard work put into the patch won't be accidently
+confident that his/her hard work put into the patch won't be accidentally
thrown away by someone in the future?
=item Is there enough documentation?